BRITISH-DOMICILED MUSLIMS STOPPED FROM GOING TO DISNEYLAND. WHAT WOULD LIFELONG CONGREGATIONALIST CHRISTIAN WALT DISNEY SAY?

So the travel agents of the United States Congress, the Department of State, have denied a brood of muslims with British citizenship from traveling to the USA. The action stopped a planned visit to Disneyland by these anti-Christian muslims.

Many have tried to play the children angle, claiming it unfair to these muslim kiddies. According to the Telegraph UK, British passport holder Mohammad Tariq Mahmood, his brother and their children aged between eight and 19 were stopped from taking a flight to Los Angeles for a planned tripped to Disneyland.  Mahmood said, "They need to check our backgrounds, check our accounts and check our businesses before they react like that. They can't react like that just because we are muslim. My kids are obviously upset. They know why it happened and they know what is going on in the world. It could be because of Donald Trump as why otherwise would all of this spring up on us."

Someone needs to edcuate Mahmood. Foreigners lack any right to travel to the USA. Congress lacks duty to let foreigners travel to the USA. Visas are privileges kindly granted by Congress through its agency.

It is odd that muslims would want to travel to Disneyland considering Walt Disney was a very devout Congregationalist Christian who was named after his family's minister, Walter Parr.
Walt Disney had Disneyland dedicated by a Congregationalist reverend upon its opening.

Odder still is why would muslims want their kids steeped in stories Walt Disney adapted from strict Lutheran Christians the Brothers Grimm —  "Cinderella" ("Aschenputtel"), "Sleeping Beauty" ("Dornröschen"), and "Snow White" ("Schneewittchen"). Snow White was an openly Christian princess. In Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Snow White can be seen praying with head bowed and hands clasped together asking God to bless the dwarfs.

Walk Disney said of himself, "All I ask of myself, 'Live a good Christian life.' To that objective I bend every effort in shaping my personal, domestic, and professional activities and growth."

As an ardent anti-communist, it is fair to speculate that Walt Disney would have been anti-Islam.

Read more ...

WHEN IRISH EYES ARE SELLING AND BUYING. WHY THE EURO AND NOT THE U.S. DOLLAR? AH THOSE BANKER'S BLUES.

So, Jeremy Warner of the UK's Telegraph caught a performance by the American financial TV broadcaster, CNBC's Joe Kernan (YouTube video) who seemed bemused upon learning the Irish banking system belongs to the Eurozone and not the British.

Warner claims it's "from an economic perspective, it's a very odd state of affairs which isn't obviously doing the country [the Irish] a great deal of good."

The Irish have had overlords since Henry II sent a force in 1171 to control his own Norman knights in their 1169 conquest of Ireland. The Irish overlords of today are German bankers mostly along with French and Italian bankers as well as their respective national politicians who get these bankers to buy sovereign bonds, thus enabling deficit spending and ever weakening the buying power of the Euro.

So why are the Irish beholden to their continental masters and not their former British masters? Here is what the numbers say.

It's true. The Irish import more goods from the Brits than from anyone else. In fact, 38.5% of all their goods come from the UK. The Irish import 1.5 times as much stuff from Brits as they do from their Eurozone friends.

However, the Irish export 2.7 times as much stuff to their Eurozone friends as they do to Brits. With their Eurozone friends, the Irish have a $37.5 billion trade surplus. With their not so beloved Brits, the Irish suffer a -$2.4 billion trade deficit.

Of their Eurozone friends, the Irish hold their best trade position with the Belgians and Luxembourgians. The Irish run a $16.5 billion trade surplus with with the two countries combined, which is 2.5 times better than their trade position with the French or the Germans, their next two biggest trading partners of the Eurozone.

In spite of their -$1.4 billion trade deficit with the Norwegians, mostly for oil, the Irish enjoy a $7.4 billion trade surplus with the banking independents, Swiss, Danish and Swedes, including the Norwegians.

Americans buy more stuff from the Irish than anyone. The Irish sell 21.6% of their goods to Americans. Americans buy 1.4 times as much stuff from the Irish as the Brits do. Americans buy from the Irish 1.5 times as much as Belgians and Luxembourgians combined, 2.4 times as much as the Germans and 3.0 times as much as the French.

The Brits with their Bank of England and British pound whom Kirnan believes should be the banking masters over Irish, engage is substantial trade with those of the Eurozone. A whopping 62.4% of Brit imports come from Eurozone countries while the Brits sell 57.4% of their exports to Eurozone countries.

Eurozone countries hold 77.5% of Brits's net trade position. The BRIC countries of China, India and Russia come in second with 44% of the British's net trade position.

As with the Irish, Americans buy more stuff from Brits than anyone else, although the Germans aren't far behind ($52.4 billion vs $47.5 billion). Brits sell three times as much stuff to the Eurozone players as they do to Americans and Canadians combined.

So, the bigger question becomes why aren't the Irish using the Federal Reserve banking system for theirs and thus the U.S. dollar for their cash? Likewise, why haven't the Brits long ago abandoned the British pound and the Bank of England in favor of the Federal Reserve and the the U.S. dollar or the European Central Bank and the Euro?

Unless the Irish have their own cash, never will the Irish be free. The Irish might as well celebrate the Henry the 8th Tudor re-conquest of Ireland of the 1530s.

Enjoy an little-known Irish export, a quality guitarist, Rory Gallagher.

Read more ...

WAKE UP BRITS. MEMBERSHIP IN THE EU MAKES YOU POORER BUT DOESN'T MAKE YOU ANYMORE EUROPEAN THAN ANYONE ELSE.

This morning I read about the weak British prime minister, David Cameron, and his political grandstanding over having to pay a surprise whopping bill of €2.1 billion to greedy European Union parliamentarians.

Almost 7/9ths of the EU budget gets spent by meddling socialistic bureaucrats to subsidize inefficient farmers and to make richer all those living in many parts of Europe by making poorer those living in some parts of Europe. The rest of the EU budget goes to paying EU government workers and to bribe foreign leaders in third world countries in exchange for securing access to resources.


Why would any working stiff Englishman, Welsh, Scot or Northern Irishman beg to have another layer of meddling, leeching politicians bleeding him of his income for more taxes to pay for foreigners living in other countries likely who would not lay down their lives in troubled times for him and equally likely who might rob him when he is on holiday with his wife and kids?

Why would any working stiff in Britain yearn to have Poles, Lithuanians, Romanians and Portuguese move to his town in droves so they can offer to work for his employer at lower wages, undercutting him and taking away his job? Already, the working bloke must contend with massive immigration from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Jamaica and Kenya.

The working mate gets richer only when capital spending goes up. But when labor gets cheaper to hire because suddenly there are more workers arriving on the shores from immigration, wages fall.

Only in proportion as labor becomes pricier that it becomes profitable to use cheaper methods (capital) to amplify labor. But when labor becomes cheaper, it becomes less profitable to use capital.

The Brit working stiff pays twice over for his products. First, he gets forced to pay even more income taxes to subsidize shoddy businesses run by eastern Europeans of the EU and then he pays again to buy products from them at retail!


Wake up Brits. It's time to vote UKIP and vote yourselves out of the European Union. Have a watch of Nigel Farage talking about the absurdity of the EU.

Europeans can have tariff-free trade and easy-pass travel between countries. They don't need a massive meddling technocracy. The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) seems to work fine for Norwegians, Icelanders and the Swiss. They don't need membership in the EU to enjoy the same standing, effectively.

So why does the EU exist? Why does the EU operate as it does?

In short, the EU exists to give politicians more control over your lives and in so doing, give themselves more power. With power, they can reward their backers.

Politics is the great evil. Politics is the art of using rhetoric to steal property. Politics is perpetual, (mostly) bloodless civil war.

Politicians and bureaucrats get their property (right of ownership) first by confiscating it from others, almost always working stiffs. Then, politicians give what they steal to pay off those who back them for power — the largest for profit firms and unions (fascism) as well as welfare seekers (socialism).

And that is the world in which you live today. You live under a hybrid system of socialism-fascism, which masquerades as the center and goes under the phony name democracy.

If you lot were smart, as Brits you would exit the EU and strive to rekindle an Anglo-American commonwealth of unfettered movement of individuals and goods among yourselves, Americans, Canadians, Aussies and Kiwis. A global Anglo world would have an impressive GDP of £14.17 trillion (US$22.8 trillion), a population of 443 million with a per capita GDP of £32,001(US$51,484).

There would be a shared heritage, a common legal framework, no language barriers and most of all, no crazed continental Europeans.

Those being made poorer are everyone living in England, Ireland, southern Scotland, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Austria, northern Italy, north-central and southwest France, northern Spain and the Balearic Islands, Cyprus, as well as those living in Prague, Czech Republic; Central Hungary; Masovian Voivodeship, Poland; Bucharest, Romania, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Those being made richer live in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Bulgaria, half of Greece, most of Portugal, Spain (Extremadura), Slovenia (Vzhodna Slovenija), southern Italy, Sicily, West Wales,  Isles of Scilly and Cornwall, UK, and the French foreign territories of French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Réunion.

Enjoy this one by Colin Moulding and XTC.




You put your cleanest dirty shirt on
Then you stagger down to meet the dawn
You take a ride upon a bus, it's just a fuss
You know it keeps you born
You get to know a morning face
You get to join the human race
You get to know the world has passed you by

Who cares? You might be dead
Who cares? You stayed in bed
Who cares? You wrote the note
Who cares? You might have spoke

Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up

You take a snack to fill the gap
And then you're ready for another shift
Your attention was diverted
By the girl who smiled and made the lift
The radio is blaring out
It's in one ear and then it's out
You didn't notice that the record's over

Who cares? You might be dead
Who cares? You stayed in bed
Who cares? You wrote the note
Who cares? You might have spoke

Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up

In the road a crowd had gathered
And a man was close to dead
The blood is running down the gutter
While you're yawning, nothing's said
His body's wriggling like an eel
They got no sense, no touch, no feel
Somebody better go and get a blanket

Who cares? You might be dead
Who cares? You stayed in bed
Who cares? You wrote the note
Who cares? You might have spoke

Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up
Wake up, wake up, wake up, who cares?

Wake up
Wake up
Wake up

Read more ...

VANDALS VANDALIZE A WORK OF VANDALISM BY VANDAL BANKSY. BRITS CRY OUT IN IRONY.

For decades, a graffiti vandal who goes by the name Banksy has vandalized walls of buildings in which he lacks any property.

In short, Banksy lacks the right to paint upon the walls of buildings he does. Further, Banks has a duty to not vandalize the walls of buildings in which others have property, which is the right of ownership and never the thing owned.

Recently, Banksy vandalized the wall of someone's building Folkestone, England. Another vandal took it upon himself or herself to better Banksy's work of vandalism by adding a drawn penis upon it.

Brits everywhere have decried the work of the second vandal as horrific vandalism destroying the work of vandalism by Banksy. How is that for a bit of irony?

Some have taken to Twitter, tweeting such foolery as "Only in #Folkstone could a #Banksy be vandalisesd."

Here is the improved work of Banksy's vandalism:



Here is a photo of Banksy's original destruction:



According to Brits, everyone should have thought vandalism throughout NYC in the low point of NYC as artwork:



Enjoy a ride through graffiti ghettos of New York City.


And the decline of Britain continues as evidenced by the way Brits believe.

Read more ...