In a queer 5-to-4 ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges, the robe-clad coven known as the U.S. Supreme Court have decreed that law givers of the various states must legally recognize that homosexuals can marry each other. Laws of the states' legislators no longer can exempt married gays from getting the same benefits as those law givers dole out to man-woman marrieds.
In spite of the rhetoric of some politicians spewed after the ruling, Americans need to suck it up. The Gay Army has won their war. They're celebrating their V-Day today.
No one should be surprised by the ruling. It was bound to happen.
Two years ago, the witches gathering of the Supremes ruled the Defense of Marriage Act, the anti-gay marriage law passed by Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton could not deny a married gays from getting benefits given by Congress to men-women married couples. Today's ruling builds from that ruling.
In many ways, the outcome of the ruling is the right one though the ruling itself suffers flaws. Legislators have no standing to impose their moral standards upon anyone and then lie with the rhetoric that those moral standards are the will of the people.
As well, legislators lack standing to impose the moral standards of some Americans and their cults to which they belong, cults that all know as churches and religions. That queer ones will have their marriages recognized by agencies of law givers in no way stops anyone from belonging to a church and acting like the hypocrites, praying in public.
Legislators should not tell the people how to live. And all Americans need to stop supporting such immaturity. If adults want to buy and sell sex (prostitution) or substances for recreational purposes (drugs), no one should stop them.
And unlike the fools who say so, queer as folk marrying queer as folk fail to violate the laws of nature. Jumping from a cliff without a parachute leads to consequences that prove men cannot violate the laws of nature.
If all of mankind stopped procreating because all decided to focus on same sex sexuality, then future mankind would die off. Even under this scenario, the laws of nature would not be violated. The consequences of not breeding would be little different than the consequences of trying to fight against gravity.
Codifying gay marriage changes little, in spite of what gays might believe. Atheists don't accept religionists. Protestants don't accept Catholics. And let's not get into the races racing against each other rather than being accepting of each other.
Legalizing gayhood doesn't mean most will stop seeing gay sex and gay love as activities outside the norm of mankind. Many still see those with face tattoos and face piercings as freaks. In spite of the hopes of parents who birthed and raise gay kids into adulthood, legal decrees never have the power to turn their adult children into normal ones.
The gay marriage movement has been about cash and credit, always. Never has it been about love.
Privilege seeking is a political act whether through marriage licenses from politicians to gain preferential treatment for taxes or through collecting welfare benefits at higher rates. It has been mere rhetoric by those behind the Gay Agenda to hide behind the rhetoric of love rather than rhetoric of riches.
Gay marriage is about dollars and little more. It is about survivor spousal benefits of Social Security welfare. It's about adding thousands of new customers for divorce lawyers and the Family Law system annually, a system that employs bureaucrats and technocrats.
No one should be fooled. As long as law givers grant rights to some based on their status and impose duty upon others because of that status, liberty is lessened for all all. When law givers grant benefits to those who are married, law givers decreases liberty precisely because they have created law. All law increases duties and rights.
In life, any adult with an intellect suitably sufficient to decide doesn't always get she or he wants, but but always, gets what she or he deserves. For years, advocates of those marriage should get benefits have played a legal game, one for a time, that has helped them. Now, they are getting what they deserve. They must welcome gays into their anti-liberty club.
The right-minded man or woman at once sees the deleterious effects of acceding authority to politicians who then decree what marriage is and who derives privileges from such arrangements. The right-minded man or woman at once sees the best action is to eliminate marital status as a factor for any government action.
Any individual is right to want to live, right to want to live without an overlord and right to pursue what gives her or him pleasure. All else is nothing but force of one or some ganging upon another or others who is or who are weaker.
Demanding privileges gained by force for what amounts to a private matter is not the hallmark of an enlightened people.
One can only hope for a backlash against today's ruling whereby many push to remove all codified discrimination. No one should get privileges because that one belongs to any artificially constructed social group like gays, blacks, Latinos, women and so on.
Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns persons into monsters as they join groups.
Those of groups revert to base instinct of mankind — the law of survival. Individuals who join groups lose themselves and become cogs of the group, one of the mob, the crowd. They end up doing wicked misdeeds in the name of advancing the group.
Every individual has the capacity of living by the Law of Love — do to others and loving one's neighbor.
Read more ...
In spite of the rhetoric of some politicians spewed after the ruling, Americans need to suck it up. The Gay Army has won their war. They're celebrating their V-Day today.
No one should be surprised by the ruling. It was bound to happen.
Two years ago, the witches gathering of the Supremes ruled the Defense of Marriage Act, the anti-gay marriage law passed by Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton could not deny a married gays from getting benefits given by Congress to men-women married couples. Today's ruling builds from that ruling.
In many ways, the outcome of the ruling is the right one though the ruling itself suffers flaws. Legislators have no standing to impose their moral standards upon anyone and then lie with the rhetoric that those moral standards are the will of the people.
As well, legislators lack standing to impose the moral standards of some Americans and their cults to which they belong, cults that all know as churches and religions. That queer ones will have their marriages recognized by agencies of law givers in no way stops anyone from belonging to a church and acting like the hypocrites, praying in public.
Legislators should not tell the people how to live. And all Americans need to stop supporting such immaturity. If adults want to buy and sell sex (prostitution) or substances for recreational purposes (drugs), no one should stop them.
And unlike the fools who say so, queer as folk marrying queer as folk fail to violate the laws of nature. Jumping from a cliff without a parachute leads to consequences that prove men cannot violate the laws of nature.
If all of mankind stopped procreating because all decided to focus on same sex sexuality, then future mankind would die off. Even under this scenario, the laws of nature would not be violated. The consequences of not breeding would be little different than the consequences of trying to fight against gravity.
Codifying gay marriage changes little, in spite of what gays might believe. Atheists don't accept religionists. Protestants don't accept Catholics. And let's not get into the races racing against each other rather than being accepting of each other.
Legalizing gayhood doesn't mean most will stop seeing gay sex and gay love as activities outside the norm of mankind. Many still see those with face tattoos and face piercings as freaks. In spite of the hopes of parents who birthed and raise gay kids into adulthood, legal decrees never have the power to turn their adult children into normal ones.
The gay marriage movement has been about cash and credit, always. Never has it been about love.
Privilege seeking is a political act whether through marriage licenses from politicians to gain preferential treatment for taxes or through collecting welfare benefits at higher rates. It has been mere rhetoric by those behind the Gay Agenda to hide behind the rhetoric of love rather than rhetoric of riches.
Gay marriage is about dollars and little more. It is about survivor spousal benefits of Social Security welfare. It's about adding thousands of new customers for divorce lawyers and the Family Law system annually, a system that employs bureaucrats and technocrats.
No one should be fooled. As long as law givers grant rights to some based on their status and impose duty upon others because of that status, liberty is lessened for all all. When law givers grant benefits to those who are married, law givers decreases liberty precisely because they have created law. All law increases duties and rights.
In life, any adult with an intellect suitably sufficient to decide doesn't always get she or he wants, but but always, gets what she or he deserves. For years, advocates of those marriage should get benefits have played a legal game, one for a time, that has helped them. Now, they are getting what they deserve. They must welcome gays into their anti-liberty club.
The right-minded man or woman at once sees the deleterious effects of acceding authority to politicians who then decree what marriage is and who derives privileges from such arrangements. The right-minded man or woman at once sees the best action is to eliminate marital status as a factor for any government action.
Any individual is right to want to live, right to want to live without an overlord and right to pursue what gives her or him pleasure. All else is nothing but force of one or some ganging upon another or others who is or who are weaker.
Demanding privileges gained by force for what amounts to a private matter is not the hallmark of an enlightened people.
One can only hope for a backlash against today's ruling whereby many push to remove all codified discrimination. No one should get privileges because that one belongs to any artificially constructed social group like gays, blacks, Latinos, women and so on.
Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns persons into monsters as they join groups.
Those of groups revert to base instinct of mankind — the law of survival. Individuals who join groups lose themselves and become cogs of the group, one of the mob, the crowd. They end up doing wicked misdeeds in the name of advancing the group.
Every individual has the capacity of living by the Law of Love — do to others and loving one's neighbor.
