Saturday, August 2, 2014

BULLYING AND THE BULLYING LIBERATION MOVEMENT

Over the last few years, bullying has become yet another front of the Culture War. Fat tolerance, pro-homosexism, gender-bending — many adults who favor these for themselves have encouraged such in teens.

When the natural blowback of bullying arises, those adults who encourage teens to get their freaks on wail that we're living through a Bullying Crisis. Invariably, they demand rules get codified to classify behavior akin to hate crimes.



The answer to bullying isn't creating a political group, gaining power and bullying others through law to force everyone else to accept grotesque, distorted caricatures of ideal human nature. That would be mere hypocrisy. That amounts to little more than privilege-seeking and yet another move toward totalitarianism.

Yet, this is exactly what the "We're in a Bullying Crisis" want. They are fighting to define anew the culture and force all others to live by their vision of a future.
The concept of bullying itself is highly rhetorical. It is tied up in ethos, ethics, culture and human nature.

Culture is the nutrient medium from which humans interact and arises from the codified law and the codes of conduct. Ethics is the art of adhering to the ethos, the prevailing paradigm over what it means to be the ideal person among a people. Ethos reflects the interplay between culture and human nature, in short, how doe enforced laws amplify or distort the ways of being human.

Human nature is the way of being alive that arises naturally from design of the body and mind. The closer a man expresses himself in relation to the inherent design of being an idealized man as well as the closer a woman does to the idealized woman, the closer that man or woman is to being self-actualized.

So why do some allegedly bully others? Bullying seems to flow from the dark side of human nature. Yet, it is pervasive and happens among people of all ages, in all times, everywhere.

In short, outsiders as individuals get bullied because such individuals do not comport to a group ethos. Those who reveal themselves to be grotesque, distorted caricatures of ideal human nature get bullied. Sometimes though, those who seem exotic, foreigners from another land who live by another way get bullied.

Bullying is a way to engage group cohesion. Leaders and those seeking status from others within a group engage in bullying. It's one way people stick together in groups.

Parents become unrealistic when they encourage their children to get their freaks on and then expect other children to become accepting. Parents who demand that other kids accept their own and confer equal standing to their own kids within a group suffer from mind disorder and live by denying reality, the reality of human nature.

Stomping one's feet against human nature is a losing war. Status in groups gets earned. Yet, parents must come to see truth. If they decide on behalf of their children to raise their kids in such ways that go against the prevailing ethos and fail to instill strategies to overcome others, then their kids shall face tough sledding.

The answer to bullying is for each child to strengthen herself and himself. Parents ought to become better parents to lead their kids to become the action heroes of their own lives. Parents are the adults in relation to their kids and have the advantage of thinking with their pre-frontal cortexes.

The answer is for parents to become better parents and to become better individuals, to strive to self-actualize so that they can better lead their children. Parents must come to see reality and human nature. They need to adjust to reality as it is.


Read more ...

WHEN THE BULLIED BECOMES THE BULLY. IT'S THE AMERICAN WAY.


Back in April, retired NBA worldwide mega-star Shaquille O’Neal took to Instagram to mock Jahmel Binion who suffers from ectodermal dysplasia. Now, Binion has filed a defamation lawsuit against O'Neal seeking $25,000 in damages.

Instagram

Two wrongs don't make a right, ever. The irony shouldn't be lost on anyone that Binion now has become the bully through his lawsuit. Suing anyone because what that one says and then soliciting support of tens of thousands of morons suffering from hyper-indoctrination amounts to bullying. Trying to stifle anyone amounts to bullying.

Binion's lawsuit behavior is uglier than his looks. If Binion wants to live the right way, he should have said he feels sorry for Shaq's expressed ugliness, an ugliness far worse than Binion's genetic deformity.

However tough Binion's life must be, he doesn't have a legal leg to stand upon. A better lawyer will frame it as distasteful First Amendment expression.

Our founders were right to give us the First Amendment. Anyone is free (at liberty, Congress cannot make any law) to express oneself in public in any manner, about anything. That is what the First Amendment is about.

Shaq pulled a bonehead move (celebs should quit social media), and however distasteful, not only Shaq but all of us are free to do the same with public material.

Shaq should fight him to the fullest and then donate ten times the sum sought to the NGO which seeks a cure to this genetic disorder.



Read more ...

Monday, August 12, 2013

WHO ARE THE BULLIES?

Last Spring (around May 17, 2012), execs at ABC News manufactured news by airing a story showing how the flagship Abercrombie & Fitch store in Manhattan only carries fit-sized clothing. Seeking to manipulate minds and conjure public opinion, these news execs pulled from an interview as a quote, words from CEO Mike Jefferies.

"In every school there are the cool and popular kids, and then there are the not-so-cool kids. Candidly, we go after the cool kids." ~ Mike Jeffries, Chairman and CEO, Abercrombie & Fitch, 2006

In so many words, Jefferies said this:

In every society there are people who are fashion-driven and buy clothes with frequency as a means for status among like-minded people and there are those who only buy for utility and because so lack status with the fashion-driven ones and thus buy infrequently. Candidly, we go after those who are fashion-driven.


In so many words the guy said, we offer clothes to fashion followers, those who buy clothes with frequency. We do not pitch our wares to people who buy only once a year or once every few years. 

It's irrelevant that A&F execs choose not to sell clothes with sizes that fit the obese. It's likely the infrequency of purchases by the obese doesn't fit with the business strategy. That is business.

What if A&F were a high-end car dealership chain? What if Jefferies said, In every society there are people who can buy a Ferrari  and there are those who can only buy a Ford. Candidly, we go after those who buy a Ferrari.

Many have likened the A&F strategy to be tantamount to bullying.  Jeffries bullied no one. 

However, the true bullies are those forcing their agenda on A&F execs and upon everyone else who is fashion-driven and shops at A&F. 

A&F is a retailer that sells to fashion-driven, 18 to 22. That means A&F sells to frequent buyers of clothes because such persons want to be seen with the latest. The CEO of A&F, Mike Jefferies, calls them "cool" and "kids". To Jefferies, that is what cool means.

The business strategy of A&F is high inventory turnover to clothes-obsessed adults seeking to belong to a tribe. A&F execs use inventory management methods such as limited sizing to achieve the strategy. A&F execs choose not to compete in the super-sized clothing category.

It seems the we're going to force you into fat acceptance agenda has whipped up furor over this.



Read more ...