Thursday, May 7, 2015

OIL PRICES. GASOLINE PRICES. THE LOWS KEEP COMING. PRICES REFLECT THE GREATEST DEPRESSION REALITY.

On May 6, 2015, the USA Today published a work by Evan Kelly (Oilprice.com) who claims oil prices are up. Also, on the same day, the jokers at Reuters report that oil prices hit 2015 peaks today.

Such is the kind of foolery you can read everywhere published by mainstream media.  After removing the effects of inflation, prices are near ten-year lows. Prices are low because Americans still are living through an economic depression that continues to get worse.






































Be sure to check out the other recent works on the Greatest Depression still ongoing.
Read more ...

Thursday, December 11, 2014

FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD INTO THE LAND OF FOOL'S GOLD

Far too many have been indoctrinated into the false belief that buying gold is investing. Never is buying gold investing.

Betting on price is speculating and not investing. Speculating is merely betting on prices either rising or falling.




Investing is buying assets organized for earnings flow in effort to gain profit and being paid from that profit. When someone buys a bond for the yield payments, that is investing. When someone buys a stock that pays a dividend, that is investing.

When someone buys ovens, tables, chairs, a dough making machine and ingredients, and then opens up a pizzeria, that one is investing. There is no guarantee that one will sell enough pizza to cover ongoing expenses much less earn a profit from which to get paid.

Buying gold means the speculator has gone long gold. The long speculator in gold believes the price of gold shall rise in the future high enough that should the speculator seek to sell his or her property in gold, the speculator shall gain a profit.

Many gold speculators, even the knuckleheads wrongly who call themselves gold investors, believe in what they call the "Gold to Silver Ratio." As I explained in OK CORNELIUS, SAM THE SNOWMAN SAYS EVERYONE WISHES FOR SILVER AND GOLD, NOT SILVER OR GOLD. The Gold-to-Silver ratio is the amount of silver in ounces one ounce of gold will buy. However, when gold speculators talk of the Gold-to-Silver ratio, they mean the amount of silver in ounces it takes to sell for cash to buy one ounce of gold. Saying either way means the same thing.

True believers in the Gold-to-Silver believe so because at one time gold and silver were coined by weight and fineness into money. In fact, coined metal by weight and fineness is the only way to define money.

Anyway, in the U.S.A. by acts of various Congresses, these Congresses defined ratios of silver-to-gold. The 2nd Congress defined the value between gold and silver as 15 units of pure silver to 1 unit of pure gold with the Coinage Act of 1792. With the Coinage Act of 1834, the 23rd Congress defined the silver-to-gold weight ratio at 16:1.

By the Coinage Act of 1873, the 43rd Congress stopped buying silver at a statutory price and stopped producing a silver dollar. The effect of both demonetized silver rendering silver no longer as money.

With Executive Order 6102, the President Roosevelt decreed money illegal, which stopped all gold coining and ordered the confiscation and destruction of all gold coins. Since then, Americans have traded almost exclusively with legal tender cash and bank credits known as checkable deposits.

Now that you know the salient background intel, which gave rise to the belief in the Gold-to-Silver ratio, we can discover for ourselves if one exists. Here is the graph I shared before on Bizarro Theater.




As you can see, the Silver-Needed-to-Buy-Gold ratio over the last 30 years hit an all-time low at the start of April 2011. After hitting a peak at the start of February 1991, the number of ounces of silver needed to buy an ounce of gold has fallen, -6.4% a year from the peak to the low hit at the start of April 2011.

Right now, using true prices, it takes 5.9 ounces of silver to buy an ounce of gold. Recently, the number of ounces of silver needed is growing at the yearly rate of 11.7% having grown over the last 15 months 34.3%. So speculators who trade between silver and gold take that as a signal to sell silver and buy gold.

While the Internet yields to us much good, the Internet also lets deceivers weave their deception easier than ever before. One kind Internet deceiver prevalent today is the gold doomsayer. The gold doomsayer is a contemporary Aaron who tries to corrupt the many into becoming gold idol worshipers.

In these works, which you can read right here on Bizarro Theater: "BUY GOLD" ADVICE IS AARON BULL*S$T IDOL WORSHIPIS THERE EVER REASON TO BUY GOLD? and LOSING ITS LUSTER. THE SECRET FUTURE OF GOLD REVEALED, I have shown you the folly of worshiping Aaron's gold idol. In the era of exclusive legal tender bank cash, there are two kinds of states that prove favorable for going long gold:

  1. A big rise in the prime rate of interest undertaken to quell borrowing of bank credit
  2. A big inflation, which is always a big rise in bank credit, such as the Greenspan-Bernanke Inflation, the biggest credit bubble in the history of mankind [ see: THE BUBBLE ALAN GREENSPAN COULDN'T SEE WITH ROUTINE DATA COLLECTED BY HIS ONE-TIME EMPLOYER, THE FEDERAL RESERVE and THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NEVER HAS MEASURED INFLATION, EVER. CLAIMING SO HAS BEEN A EPIC CON JOB. ]
So, having thought more on contemporary Aaron's and their gold idol worshiping, I decided to look into gold relative to other kinds of speculation.

First, let's look at a chunk of carbon relative to gold.




The faint line seen in the graph is a trend line. The trend slopes downward  to the right. That tells us Aussie Coal and Gold have a relationship over the last 30 years. Over the last 30 years, it has taken less and less coal to buy an ounce of gold. The trend is clear, gold has become less important relative to coal over the last 30 years.

Everywhere along that trendline, from a point on the trend line, had a long speculator sold gold and bought coal, holding coal to a bottom, that speculator who have profited by dumping gold and buying coal.

And now let's look at the relationship between heating oil and gold over the last 30 years.




What about other energy commodities?











How has gold fared against lowly metals?









Had gold dominated rubber from the rubber tree?



Now, it is true, had any long gold speculator bought at lows below the trend line and held until peaks above the trend line, such a gold speculator would have earned profits. However, it takes true genius to reckon exactly the timing of markets.

The long run trend above is clear. Over the last 30 years, gold has become little more than a commodity with its price decided by winning bidders in purchases and sales primarily for commercial purposes (jewelry) and industrial purposes (plating).

In Part 2, I shall reveal the graphs for more commodities and the one many might be curious about, how much of the S&P 500 does it take to buy gold?


Read more ...

Sunday, July 20, 2014

PUTIN. IT'S OVER, AT LEAST UNTIL WINTER.

Putin. It's over.

The shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 and the spin that ethnic Rus separatists in east Ukraine are the culprits has given political leaders of European countries and the United States the persuasion in propaganda fodder needed to sway public opinion worldwide against the separatists and Putin in favor of the European Union.

Those living in eastern Ukraine better learn to speak Ukrainian. Otherwise, they ought to emigrate to Russia.

As for Putin, he has a few cards in his hand. The first one he must play is ending any covert support for separatists. For the remaining cards, Putin shall need to wait until winter. Then, Putin can cut off all nat gas sales piped through Ukrainian pipes.

It could be a bitter cold and rather pricey winter in Europe upcoming. Good luck Czechs, Slovenes, Austrians, and Italians. As well, good luck to Latvians and Estonians and all those who had harsh rhetoric for Putin and his band of Ruskies.

Read more ...

Thursday, May 8, 2014

PUTIN'S RUSSIANS AREN'T MEDDLING IN UKRAINE BECAUSE OF OIL

So today, through Zero Hedge, I discovered Our Finite World a blog by Gail Tverberg with the tag line "exploring how oil limits affect the economy." 



In Russia and the Ukraine – The Worrisome Connection to World Oil and Gas Problems, Ms. Tverberg posits Russians are starting to experience economic contraction cause by these factors:

  • a low revenue situation — Russians "are not receiving enough oil and gas revenue to meet their needs" 
  • Russians "are not able to collect enough taxes to provide the services they have promised to their citizens"
  • Russians are not receiving enough oil and gas revenue to pay "the amount of reinvestment that is needed to maintain production"
According to RIA Novosti, Russian politicians approved the draft budget for 2014-2016. Here is what it looks like:
  • The budget basis on the Urals oil price of US$93 per barrel in 2014 and US$95 per barrel in 2015 and 2016.
  • The 2014 budget deficit will stand at US$12.4 billion, 0.5 percent of GDP with US$428.6 billion in revenues and US$440.1 billion expenditures.
  • The 2015 is expected deficit will more than double and stand at US$25.8 billion, 1 percent of GDP, with US$459.3 billion in revenue and US$485.2 billion in expenditures.  
  • The 2016 budget deficit is expected to drop to US$15.3 billion, 0.6 percent of GDP with US$502.4 billion in revenues and US$517.7 billion in expenditures.
The current FY deficit for Americans is 4% of GDP ($680 billion FY deficit over $17 trillion GDP estimate)! That is 4 times more than the Russians in their expected worse year!


Right now, the Russian Export Blend Crude Oil (REBCO) futures end of day settlement price sits at $106.55.  The EIA claims the Russians export 2,600,307 million barrels a day. Assuming the spot REBCO price every day for a year, Russian oil sales over 365 days would be US$277.1 billion

According to Wikipedia, revenues in 2012 for Gazprom summed to US$164 billion, for Lukoil US$139 billion, for Rosneft, US$101.

Ms. Tverberg claims Russians as  "marginal producers" being pushed out. Yet, the EIA says Russians are in the top tier of producers pumping greater than 10 million barrels a day.

If prices were to fall for REBCO, for WTI, for Brent, it's likely the 204 countries producing less than a million a day would be the ones pushed out.  

The whole of trade gets governed by one, true, infrangible law and one axiom — the Law of Prices and the Axiom of Profit. The Law of Prices holds the winning bids of purchase and sale set the price. The Axiom of Profit holds the sum of sales must at least equal the cost of production otherwise a producer goes to run. 

By the Law of Prices, the price of whatever set by winning bidders dictate the expense which can get incurred to produce the last quantity of X whereby a producer does not fall to the Axiom of Profit. 

The numbers easily stack against Ms. Tverberg and her false thesis that Russians are being forced into a takeover of Ukraine because of oil and government finances in disarray. 

Ms. Tverberg believes the world is reaching limits on oil and gas production. Many fall for such fallacy.

Kent Bower doesn't believe the world is reaching its limits on oil and gas production. Bower actually works in natural gas and oil drilling and has for decades. Bower is the geologist who calculated that Texas’s Barnett Shale held more natural gas than government bureaucrats and others estimated. 

Bowker has said “It’s not as drastic as what people think. You listen to all the naysayers saying we’re running out of oil, we’re running out of gas, there’s not going to be anything left. We’re always running out of oil, we’re always running out of gas. But obviously that’s not the case.”

World oil output has grown 6% since 2009 alone. The people at the EIA say world oil output for 2013 ran to 32.97 BILLION barrels.

A far likelier reason is push back by Russians against U.S. political establishment policy of encirclement of Russia, Iran and China. Even bungling Obama has “pivoted” to Asia.

In short, U.S. leaders have pushed to get NATO forces and weapons systems as close to the border of Russia as they can. In so doing, it cuts down the distance needed to launch attack against Russians while lengthening the distance Russians must overcome to counterattack.


Putin and his team likely understand that if the U.S. and its proxies get to the Russian border, Russians get subordinated to a U.S. dollar / Euro regime.





Read more ...