Thursday, May 7, 2015

OIL PRICES. GASOLINE PRICES. THE LOWS KEEP COMING. PRICES REFLECT THE GREATEST DEPRESSION REALITY.

On May 6, 2015, the USA Today published a work by Evan Kelly (Oilprice.com) who claims oil prices are up. Also, on the same day, the jokers at Reuters report that oil prices hit 2015 peaks today.

Such is the kind of foolery you can read everywhere published by mainstream media.  After removing the effects of inflation, prices are near ten-year lows. Prices are low because Americans still are living through an economic depression that continues to get worse.






































Be sure to check out the other recent works on the Greatest Depression still ongoing.
Read more ...

Thursday, December 11, 2014

MORE FOOL'S GOLD FOOLERY. GOLD VS COMMODITIES

In FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD INTO THE LAND OF FOOL'S GOLD, I shared with you graphs and other links that show the inverse relationship gold has with energy commodities and metal commodities.

Now, I shall show you how gold fares against other commodities.

Fertilizers





Grains











Fruits





.

Oils







Soybeans





Sugar



Tea




Wool


Wood





Commodities Where Gold has Fared Better Against 











Read more ...

FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD INTO THE LAND OF FOOL'S GOLD

Far too many have been indoctrinated into the false belief that buying gold is investing. Never is buying gold investing.

Betting on price is speculating and not investing. Speculating is merely betting on prices either rising or falling.




Investing is buying assets organized for earnings flow in effort to gain profit and being paid from that profit. When someone buys a bond for the yield payments, that is investing. When someone buys a stock that pays a dividend, that is investing.

When someone buys ovens, tables, chairs, a dough making machine and ingredients, and then opens up a pizzeria, that one is investing. There is no guarantee that one will sell enough pizza to cover ongoing expenses much less earn a profit from which to get paid.

Buying gold means the speculator has gone long gold. The long speculator in gold believes the price of gold shall rise in the future high enough that should the speculator seek to sell his or her property in gold, the speculator shall gain a profit.

Many gold speculators, even the knuckleheads wrongly who call themselves gold investors, believe in what they call the "Gold to Silver Ratio." As I explained in OK CORNELIUS, SAM THE SNOWMAN SAYS EVERYONE WISHES FOR SILVER AND GOLD, NOT SILVER OR GOLD. The Gold-to-Silver ratio is the amount of silver in ounces one ounce of gold will buy. However, when gold speculators talk of the Gold-to-Silver ratio, they mean the amount of silver in ounces it takes to sell for cash to buy one ounce of gold. Saying either way means the same thing.

True believers in the Gold-to-Silver believe so because at one time gold and silver were coined by weight and fineness into money. In fact, coined metal by weight and fineness is the only way to define money.

Anyway, in the U.S.A. by acts of various Congresses, these Congresses defined ratios of silver-to-gold. The 2nd Congress defined the value between gold and silver as 15 units of pure silver to 1 unit of pure gold with the Coinage Act of 1792. With the Coinage Act of 1834, the 23rd Congress defined the silver-to-gold weight ratio at 16:1.

By the Coinage Act of 1873, the 43rd Congress stopped buying silver at a statutory price and stopped producing a silver dollar. The effect of both demonetized silver rendering silver no longer as money.

With Executive Order 6102, the President Roosevelt decreed money illegal, which stopped all gold coining and ordered the confiscation and destruction of all gold coins. Since then, Americans have traded almost exclusively with legal tender cash and bank credits known as checkable deposits.

Now that you know the salient background intel, which gave rise to the belief in the Gold-to-Silver ratio, we can discover for ourselves if one exists. Here is the graph I shared before on Bizarro Theater.




As you can see, the Silver-Needed-to-Buy-Gold ratio over the last 30 years hit an all-time low at the start of April 2011. After hitting a peak at the start of February 1991, the number of ounces of silver needed to buy an ounce of gold has fallen, -6.4% a year from the peak to the low hit at the start of April 2011.

Right now, using true prices, it takes 5.9 ounces of silver to buy an ounce of gold. Recently, the number of ounces of silver needed is growing at the yearly rate of 11.7% having grown over the last 15 months 34.3%. So speculators who trade between silver and gold take that as a signal to sell silver and buy gold.

While the Internet yields to us much good, the Internet also lets deceivers weave their deception easier than ever before. One kind Internet deceiver prevalent today is the gold doomsayer. The gold doomsayer is a contemporary Aaron who tries to corrupt the many into becoming gold idol worshipers.

In these works, which you can read right here on Bizarro Theater: "BUY GOLD" ADVICE IS AARON BULL*S$T IDOL WORSHIPIS THERE EVER REASON TO BUY GOLD? and LOSING ITS LUSTER. THE SECRET FUTURE OF GOLD REVEALED, I have shown you the folly of worshiping Aaron's gold idol. In the era of exclusive legal tender bank cash, there are two kinds of states that prove favorable for going long gold:

  1. A big rise in the prime rate of interest undertaken to quell borrowing of bank credit
  2. A big inflation, which is always a big rise in bank credit, such as the Greenspan-Bernanke Inflation, the biggest credit bubble in the history of mankind [ see: THE BUBBLE ALAN GREENSPAN COULDN'T SEE WITH ROUTINE DATA COLLECTED BY HIS ONE-TIME EMPLOYER, THE FEDERAL RESERVE and THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NEVER HAS MEASURED INFLATION, EVER. CLAIMING SO HAS BEEN A EPIC CON JOB. ]
So, having thought more on contemporary Aaron's and their gold idol worshiping, I decided to look into gold relative to other kinds of speculation.

First, let's look at a chunk of carbon relative to gold.




The faint line seen in the graph is a trend line. The trend slopes downward  to the right. That tells us Aussie Coal and Gold have a relationship over the last 30 years. Over the last 30 years, it has taken less and less coal to buy an ounce of gold. The trend is clear, gold has become less important relative to coal over the last 30 years.

Everywhere along that trendline, from a point on the trend line, had a long speculator sold gold and bought coal, holding coal to a bottom, that speculator who have profited by dumping gold and buying coal.

And now let's look at the relationship between heating oil and gold over the last 30 years.




What about other energy commodities?











How has gold fared against lowly metals?









Had gold dominated rubber from the rubber tree?



Now, it is true, had any long gold speculator bought at lows below the trend line and held until peaks above the trend line, such a gold speculator would have earned profits. However, it takes true genius to reckon exactly the timing of markets.

The long run trend above is clear. Over the last 30 years, gold has become little more than a commodity with its price decided by winning bidders in purchases and sales primarily for commercial purposes (jewelry) and industrial purposes (plating).

In Part 2, I shall reveal the graphs for more commodities and the one many might be curious about, how much of the S&P 500 does it take to buy gold?


Read more ...

Monday, June 30, 2014

WHO NEEDS A CAR AND A 747 WHEN YOU CAN'T BUY A GALLON OF GAS?





So yesterday, a dialogue of sorts opened up between Tim Worstall of Forbes as well as the Adam Smith Institute and myself. Forbes published a piece of work by Worstall in which Worstall makes these claims about gasoline prices in America:

  • "Futures speculation doesn't change the price of gasoline one whit"
  • Americans do not set the price of gasoline in the USA
  • The global balance of supply sets the price of gasoline in the USA 
  • Futures trading does not affect the price of physical commodities
  • David Ricardo rendered an Iron Law of One Price 
Worstall addressed me and said this bit of foolery,


"[A]t the more general level gasoline prices are set by the international price of crude oil. If this were not true then gas prices would not move in lock step with that price of international crude. Given that they do therefore they must be so influenced...There are significant gasoline exports from the US: so the market is so integrated."

Worstall's beliefs are quite absurd. Worstall believes that crude oil prices set the price of gasoline. Worstall tries to defend the false belief that input prices set output prices. In so doing, Worstall expresses the fallacy that costs set price.

It was Worstall's beloved David Ricardo who is well-known for having started that fallacy. It is Karl Marx who is well-known for perpetuating that fallacy in is his foolish “Labor Theory of Value”.

If it were true that crude set gasoline, that is, if the fallacy of costs set price were true, then why do refiners go out of business? Why do retailers go out of business?  Why wouldn’t businessmen merely charge costs to avoid bankruptcy? Why wouldn’t businessmen merely raise prices at will to cover increasing costs to avoid bankruptcy?

Crude oil prices do not set gasoline prices, ever. Gasoline prices for gasoline bought by retailers are set by futures markets players. To believe anything else is to reveal profound confusion on the matter.

Futures speculation sets prices of refined gasoline purchased by retailers. At the delivery date of a futures contract, someone must take physical delivery of that refined gasoline at the settlement price of the contract.

The entire purpose of futures speculation is to set prices of commodities. In so doing, futures markets players keep the flow of gasoline to retailers both in times of glut and in times of shortage.

Speculation into graded contracts creates a steady, active market for property of all kinds without respect to on-the-spot winning bids for what is on offer at any moment. The purpose of organized futures speculation is to give rise to consistent profit from transmuting property as capital into property as wealth under efficiency.

Gasoline retailers are price takers of the gasoline price set by futures markets players. Oil refined into gasoline is the product they sell at retail. Gasoline retailers are retailers the same as supermarket operators who sell milk, eggs, bread, meat.

All prices adhere to the one and only true law that governs all of commerce — the Law of Prices. The Law of Prices holds the winning bids of purchase and sale in the face of what is on offer sets the price.

It is drivers alone who buy gasoline who set the retail price from their winning bids.  Once futures players set the price of gasoline for retailers, retailers try to make a go of it by accepting prices set by drivers who buy gasoline.

The whole trick of business is producing so that one can adhere to the Axiom of Profit on given prices set by winning bidders. The Axiom of Profit holds the sum of sales on prices set by winning bidders must at least equal the cost of production, otherwise the seller goes to ruin.

If drivers drive less, buying many thousands fewer gallons of gasoline, retailers shall be forced to accept lower winning bids for what they have on offer.  For some, owing to inefficiency, they shall sell at a loss and get forced into bankruptcy. That is the great Axiom of Profit in action.

In 1994, there were 202,800 retail sites for the sales of gasoline. In 2012, that number had fallen to 156,065. The total number of sites has fallen -29.9% falling at a rate of -1.4% a year.

Thus, it can be seen that between 1994 and 2012, many retailers could not make a go of it profitably on extant prices for gasoline set by futures speculators. Therefore, these unprofitable retailers exited the field.

Worstall is quite wrong about all of it, as usual from my experiences reading his work. Perhaps Worstall should find another occupation as he seems to be wrong, consistently on all matters of commerce.

Reality thoroughly contradicts Worstall. As to prices of gasoline, the EIA reports prices in the USA differ by region. As well, Bloomberg reports prices for gasoline differ by country. Thus, it can be seen there is no fictitious global balance of supply and demand that sets the price of gasoline in the USA as Worstall so wrongly believes.

Further, imports of refined gasoline can come into the USA profitably only if outlays to refine elsewhere are low enough such that when combined with transport outlays, foreign producers can at least break even on prices set here in various regions of the USA. As can be seen here by PADD (Petroleum Administrative Defense Districts) region, most foreign exporters of crude to Americans do not also export gasoline likely because it is not profitable to do so.

David Ricardo never wrote about an “iron law of one price.” Germans academicians stuck Ricardo with the phrase, “the Iron Law” and they did so because Ricardo had written something about wages only and not other prices.

Specifically, Ricardo claimed there is a tendency for population to rise as soon as wages would rise above bare necessaries to sustain living thus. This thought became known as the "Iron Law of Wages."

Worstall tries to make an appeal to authority by mentioning Bank of Sweden laureate, Paul Krugman. According to Worstall, Krugman claims futures trading doesn’t affect the price of commodities.

Krugman is an expert in academic economics. However, Krugman appears not to know anything about commerce.  Like Worstall, Krugman is a shop-talker and not a man who deals in profit and loss from selling stuff. Krugman works at think tanks and he teaches.


Read more ...