STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?

The reveal of lies keep coming for Hillary Clinton. This time, it seems the woman lied about work shenanigans involving someone she supervised while working as a secretary, the Secretary of State.


Clinton managed to bend the rules of government so Huma Abedin could collect three paychecks — from the Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation, from Tenco, a for-profit business and from Congress. In short Clinton made it possible for Abedin to get paid all while possibly having conflicts of interest.

This latest lie comes on the high heels of Hillary trying to justify using a home computer and a public DNS account to send and receive classified government documents from co-workers at the state department. Hillary and her team brilliantly called her email account: clintonemail.com.

A look up of the whois record reveals someone paid to create the domain name to associate with an IP address on 2009-January-13. At the time of the registration, Hillary was still working as a senator from the State of New York.

It almost seems that Hillary and her team knew Congress would confirm her to become Secretary of State by a vote of 94–2 only eight days later.

Why would you want Mrs. Bill Clinton Hillary Clinton to become president of the United States?

• Hillary was the long-time housewife of a career politician. 
• Hillary was not smart enough to pass the bar exam to become a practicing lawyer in Washington, D.C. Yet, almost everyone else who took the same exam passed it. She never took the D.C. test again.
• The foolish people of New York put her into office precisely because of being Bill Clinton's housewife.
• Hillary lacked any political experience, the kind most people get starting locally and working years to acquire by winning election to offices of successive responsibility.
• And then Hillary was appointed to what amounts to a ceremonial job, one that had her nod her head yes to career technocrats who are the ones that devise foreign policy.

Hillary lacks any executive experience. She has never run anything in her life. She was never governor nor mayor. She never even worked as a town supervisor.

Voting for Hillary is a vote for conjured, faked political career built solely on the back of her husband, from the convenient retirement of a senator in New York so Hillary could have that job to the Secretary of State job given to her by Obama, a requirement by the Democratic Party. However, if enough Americans foolishly elect Mrs. Bill Clinton as President of the U.S., no one should be under delusion that she will have earned such on merit. She will have gotten the job solely because of man, her husband, the Democratic Party and the stupidity of at least 51% of Americans who will have voted for her.

Mrs. "I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas" Clinton sided with that other U.S. political genius, John McCain and advocated arming the rebels in Syria to the teeth. Once trained in advanced U.S. weaponry, these rebels became the terrorist organization ISIL/ISIS/IS that now wants to turn the Middle East into a unified stone age empire.

So it is humorously odd that Mrs. "I earned $100,000 trading pork bellies on $1,000 with no experience in only 10 months and you can too" Clinton wants to contrast herself from the foreign policy failure that is Obama and his NSA team.

Mrs. Clinton's political career is almost as phony as Obama's, the community organizer who ran in exclusively black districts in Illinois (see: IT'S BECAUSE I AM BLACK, ISN'T IT?). At the time of her election to the U.S. Senate by New Yorkers, those voters must have suffered serious intellectual deficiencies.

In many respects, they were far more clueless than the voters of Illinois who elected Obama to the U.S. Senate. At least he gained some on-the-job training having been elected to the Illinois state legislature.

Americans should wonder why are they punishing themselves in having elected Obama twice and now consider electing Bill Clinton's hausfraü for Americans' next four year president.

By the way, whatever happened to that Rodham foolery name business? Bill's wife no longer goes by that name.

Read more ...

CANADIAN POLITICIAN HAD NEVER HEARD OF AUSCHWITZ YET SHE WANTS YOUR VOTE

"Well, I didn't know what Auschwitz was, or I didn't up until today," said Alex Johnstone, a political candidate seeking to become a representative to provincial parliament in Canada. According to the CBC / The Canadian Press, in NDP Candidate Alex Johnstone 'Didn't Know What Auschwitz Was,' eight years ago, Johnstone wrote on her Facebook a mocking comment about artifacts of the NAZI concentration at Auschwitz.

Shockingly, Johnstone is vice-chairwoman of school district's board of directors. The woman managed to get through a master's degree program in social welfare as well as live through the television-era and yet she had never heard of Auschwitz until her ignorance became revealed publicly.

It does not seem possible that anyone born after World War 2 doesn't know about the NAZI Holocaust against European Jews and at least a few buzzwords like Auschwitz, Kristallnacht , Anne Frank, Final Solution, Treblinka, Nuremberg Trials.

If Johnstones suffers from a mediocre intellect, it is understandable she might not know these:

• Arbeit Macht Frei
• Krakow Ghetto
• Warsaw Ghetto
• Oskar Schindler
• Zyklon B

Politics attracts the nuttiest. Likely, almost all politicians suffer from mental illness. By their crazed beliefs, they believe they are superior to you and thus you should anoint them to do more than lead you. You should surrender to them and let them tell you what to do to your dying days.

The NDP is the national socialist party of Canadians. 

Read more ...

50 SHADES OF BERNIE SANDERS.

So back in 1972, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who now is the lone socialist American holding high office, wrote a bizarre work published by the Vermont Freeman. This has become news because the socialist Sanders seeks the Democratic Party nomination to run for the presidency of the USA.

Sanders began by revealing likely his own masturbation fantasy in the opening two sentences of his work, "A man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied, a woman abused." After all, how would Sanders know what the majority of American male masturbators think about when they flog themselves?

Not to be outdone by himself, in only the third sentence of the work, Sanders wrote, "A woman enjoys intercourse with her man – as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously." No where in the work does Sanders cite any scientific studies that detail what women fantasize about during sex with their husbands or boyfriends.

Apologists for Sanders want all to believe Sanders was enslaved to a hippy, stream-of-consciousness writing episode, a sort of writing epilepsy. A guy named Michael Briggs, a spokesman for Sanders claims Sanders was stupid and thus produced a "dumb attempt at dark satire."

Clearly, the work isn't satire. The word satire entered into English in the late 1300s from the Middle French word satire meaning work intended to ridicule vice or folly.

There isn't anything in Sander's stream-of-consciousness fantasies that could be construed as satire. What vice did Sander's ridicule? Is masturbation a vice? Is having sexual fantasy a vice?

If not vice, whose folly did Sanders ridicule? Is it folly to have sexual fantasies?

And why does a senator of the United States Congress need a spokesman? Shouldn't senators be like Cicero, the famous Roman senator orator?

Briggs claims that, "When Bernie got into this race he understood there would be
attempts to distract voters from the real issues." Bernie himself has distracted voters with his masturbatory fantasies.

Update:

On Sunday, Bernie himself said, "This is a piece of fiction that I wrote in 1972...you know, something like Fifty Shades of Grey." Bernie Sanders confessed to be a writer of erotic literature, a work filled with sadomasochistic imagery derived from his mind — masturbating to thoughts of bound and tortured submissive females and his hoping females want to be raped and not merely raped but gang raped for who knows how long, except Bernie himself.

From what source did Bernie draw to write, but from his own mind and his own thoughts? Did Bernie not first imagine thoughts of masturbating, binding and torturing kneeling women, before writing those thoughts to paper?

And even if Bernie were into BDSM, as long as he were involved with consenting adults, no one else should care. However, rape means a crime precisely because the victim has not consented to sex. It's quite twisted to believe that women want to be forced to have sex against their wills because women prefer being raped. It's even creepier to write about it in erotic literature hoping to bring others to arousal.

In spite of the claims by some apologists for Bernie, women don't have rape fantasies. 

According to a peer-reviewed scientific-method study conducted by academicians at the University of Montreal (Quebec, Canada), women have fantasies about being dominated sexually (64.6%), having sex with an unknown person (48.9%), and being tied up for sexual pleasure (52.1%).

Yet, only 30.9% fantasize about sex with two men. Only 36.3% fantasize about being spanked or whipped for sexual pleasure. And only 28.9% fantasize about being forced to have sex.

In no fantasy about being dominated or being forced to have sex do women ever state they want to be raped by three guys. Having consensual sex with a stranger is a far cry from being brutally raped by three men at the same time. That is Bernie's fantasy!

All should be reminded that Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont, is running for president for the USA. Perhaps Sanders ought to quit the senate, quit running for president and take up what could be his true calling, writing mediocre erotic literature.

Is this Bernie's campaign theme song:

Read more ...

POLITICIANS AND TV BLABBER HEADS HAVE LIED TO YOU FOR YEARS ABOUT THE ECONOMY. SEE THE TRUTH.

In THE SECRETS OF AUTOMATED CLEARINGS, GDP AND THE ECONOMY. RECOVERY? WHEN?, I showed you how bank clearings of checkable deposits between two parties strongly correlates with GDP once you remove the effects of inflation. As you know GDP is the measures the economy.



To further show you there hasn't been any recovery, I give you these confirming charts.

Bank credit comprises about 71% of all banking activity as measured by assets bankers declare on their books. Consumer activity comprises 11.1% of all banking activity. Residential realty of both  closed-end residential loans and  bortgage-backed securities comprises 20.6% of all banking activity. Producer activity comprises 22.2% of all banking activity.

Bank credit to Producers consists of Commercial and industrial loans as well as     Commercial real estate loans. Bank credit to Consumers consists of  Consumer loans as well as Revolving home equity loans.




The consumer pictures do not look so good. Since hitting a peak at the end of Q1 2010, true consumer loans have fallen -29.4%, falling at a rate of -5.6% a year.




True Home equity line of credit (HELOC) loans peaked at the end of Q3 2008. Since then, HELOCs have fallen -58.9%, falling at a rate of -13.8% a year.



Combined, true bank credit to consumers peaked at the end of Q4 2007. Since the peak, bank credit to consumers has fallen -43.6%, falling at rate of -12%.



The producer pictures do not look much better. True commercial and industrial loans peaked at the end of Q3 2008. Since then, true commercial and industrial loans have fallen -44.9%, falling at a rate of -9.4% a year.



True commercial real estate loans peaked at the end of Q4 2007. Since then, true commercial real estate loans have fallen -51.8%, falling at a rate of -10.2% a year.




Combined, true bank credit to producers peaked at the end of Q3 2008. Since the peak, true bank credit to producers has fallen -49.6%, falling at rate of -10.8%.

If there is a glimmer of hope, that can be found in true commercial and industrial loans. Since Q4 2011, true commercial and industrial loans have grown 0.6%, growing at an annual rate of 0.2%.

We're living in the 21st century. Politicians need to stop lying about obvious reality. Central bankers and others need to acknowledge their hubris.

Politicians and central bankers don't know what they're doing and they never did. If they did, it wouldn't take six years to fix the economy.

It's quite eye-opening when at long last one grows up only to discover almost all adults mostly lie about everything and many adults are too stupid to know they repeat lies willingly for those who hold power over them.

Fictional-character Gregory House is right. Everybody lies.

Read more ...

¡OH-LAY! ¡OLÉ! SPANISH POLITICIANS DECREE HEROIN AND HOOKERS LEGAL (AT LEAST ON PAPER)

According to Libertad, Spanish politicians will legalize prostitution and drug trafficking for the purposes of statistics in an effort to boost GDP on paper. In so doing, with a higher GDP, Spanish politicians can run bigger fiscal year deficits and still remain within 18-country Eurozone banking mandates as outlined in the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) mandated by European Union politicians for the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU).



Under the SGP, EMU member countries cannot have a fiscal year deficit greater than 3% of GDP nor can the cumulative political debt exceed 60% of GDP. Current Spanish GDP tallies to US$1.358 trillion (€1.062 trillion). Adding US$44.7 billion (€35 billion) worth of otherwise illegal drugs sales and illegal prostitute hook ups instantly will add 3.3% to Spanish GDP.

Adding heroin and hookers to GDP statistics would let Spanish politicians run a US$42.1 billion (€32.9 billion) fiscal year deficit and still abide by the SGP. The legally-sanctioned illegal prostitution and illegal drug industry would let Spanish politicians up their FY deficit spending by US$1.36 billion (€1.06 billion) and stay within the SGP of the EMU.

Overnight, prostitution and drugging would become an industry equal in size to electrical power generation as well as education. Each of the 19,773,438 Spanish males age 15 and over spent US$2,262.59 (€1,769.91) last year to party it up with street walkers and drugs.

Politicians always seize the opportunity to spend more of what they don't have in their never-ending quest to maintain their tenuous grip on power. As always, the greedy extend their grubby hands awaiting to get more of that borrowed spending.

Enjoy a groove tune by Lowell George and Little Feat.

There's whiskey, and bad cocaine. Poison get you just the same. 

And if that don't kill you soon. The women will down at the Spanish Moon. 

Read more ...

THE FACTS OF EVERYTHING MANKIND. REALITY. TRUTH. LIFE.

SOCIETY

• Before society there are only individuals. 
• Society is merely individuals as strangers who form association through property for mutual benefit of trade, self-interest and self-expression. 
• A society of property is the only kind of society that can arise among strangers, each who pursue self-interested goals.
• Property means right of ownership in things of matter, in things expressed from the mind and body, and in action to be done in future. Property does not mean the things owned. 
• Property is a bundle of rights  — right for possession (Jus Possidendi), right for using (Jus Utendi), right for destroying, alienating (Jus Abutendi), right for recovery when found in the wrongful possession of another (Jus Vindicandi).

TRADE

• Trade is about trading property for profit and nothing else.
• Only when property gets created, can trade arise between two persons. 
• The name for property put to making stuff is called capital.
• The name of property created by capital and yet to be sold in a purchase and sale is stock (inventory).
• The name for property put to purchase and sale for cash and credit is wealth.
• The name for property that can be sold to satisfy debts is asset.
• The name for property pledged against a debt is collateral.
• Buying power is the means by which anyone can acquire the wealth wanted after selling away wealth produced in surplus and not wanted, whether that wealth is embodied in a finished product or work through time.
• Profit is the name of sales at prices set by winning bidders less the outlay spent to acquire property for those sales.
• Profit signals potential return to increasing capitalization to gain efficiency and thus higher profit, lest competitors come to the party with better capitalization.
• Profit is the source of earned buying power.
• The Law of Prices governs prices.
• The Axiom of Profit governs producers. 
• The Law of Prices holds the winning bids of purchase and sale in the face of what is on offer sets the price.
• The Axiom of Profit holds the sum of sales on winning bids must at least equal the cost of production otherwise the producer goes to ruin.
• Trading wealth as property in cash and credit in a purchase and sale for wealth as property in things determines the extent of markets. 
• A trade is a purchase and sale for cash or credit, which can be settled by cash.
• No one has money as money is coined metal by weight and fineness and can exist without banking or government.
• Money does not exist anymore and hasn't for decades.
• In the days of money, money extinguished both cash and credit.
• Everyone trades with bank credit in purchases and sales.
• Today, because of the legal tender designation for cash, cash lets anyone settle contracts straightaway.
• Bank credits and cash constitute buying power.
• Bank credit consists of deposits and cash, which are evidences of deposits circulating in perpetuity.
• Cash is printed, circulating bank credits. 
• Cash consists of banknotes issued by a centralized authority.
• Cash stands as a money substitute.
• Cash exists as a money substitute precisely because politicians have decreed legal tender status for cash.
• Cash cannot exist without banking.
• Legal tender cash cannot exist without government.
• Gresham's Law reveals why cash has crowded out money.
• Without doubt, doing the work of money does not make something money. 
• Credit does the work of money and no one would ever say credit is money.
• Anyone who possesses cash has bearer negotiability, also said as currency.
• Bearer negotiability means the right of ownership in a thing gets passed along with honest possession in every sale or every exchange, that is, the property and the possession are inseparable.
• Inflation is a rise of bank credit beyond trade needs.
• Inflation happens first, and then deflation thereafter, always. 
• The damaging effects of inflation become revealed when the growth of credit outstrips the growth of output owing to credit being priced too cheap.
• Inflation leads to the profit squeeze when the sum of sales on extant prices set by winning bidders is below the outlay for production. When many awaken to their lacking the means to pay bills, this leads to crisis and subsequent collapse of trade. This collapse all know as recession or depression.
• Banking crises always happen at peak inflation right in the midst of prosperity.
• Labor is the working man's capital. 
• Work done is the working man's wealth, which she or he trades for wages, most often in the form of bank credits and less so for cash. 
• Wages paid is wealth traded away to hire work.
• Labor makes property. Capital makes property efficiently.
• Labor absent capital is living at bare subsistence. 
• It is to capital that profit can arise owing to efficiency of surplus output. 
• Wages and capital are interlinked.
• True wages move in lockstep with true capital spending per capita of prime age working adults (25-54).
• Only in proportion as labor becomes pricier that it becomes profitable to use cheaper methods (capital) to amplify labor.
• Increasing returns to capital arise when true wages go up. 
• There are no means by which living standards can better that do not involve the increase in wealth per capita of prime age workers.
• The reward for overcoming loss with property at-risk is profit. 
• It is a way for a people to ensure resources are being used properly and products being made that those who are efficient want.
• Price is an objective ratio that expresses a rate of trade of a trade quantity for cash or credit denominated in cash. 
• Value is an objective ratio of exchange in swap, which most know as barter. 
• Price and value arise from the same concept, except one has cash as one economic quantity for another. 
• Both are rates of trade, of exchange.
• By objective, we mean that someone not a party to a trade can observe the swap. 
• There isn't anything subjective about it. 
• Prices get set by double auctions, an English auction and Dutch auction happening at the same time.
• In an English auction, the highest bidder wins.
• In a Dutch auction, the lowest bidder wins.
• In most job markets, inter-employer competition has employers engage in English auctions (highest bidder wins) for workers, while inter-worker competition has workers engage in Dutch auctions (lowest bidder wins) for jobs.
• Where the winning bidders of employers and winning bidders of work seekers intersect, that is the clearing price, which, when it involves work, we call it a wage.
• In credit-as-capital markets, inter-lender competition has lenders engage in Dutch auctions (lowest bidder wins) for borrowers, while inter-borrower competition has borrowers engage in English auctions (highest bidder wins) for jobs.
• Where the winning bidders of lending and winning bidders of borrowing intersect, that is the clearing price, which, when it involves credit, we call it a interest.
• Both rent and interest to the capitalist are shares of profit paid in parts as a hedge against loss. 
• Trade, or commerce, or real economics has correspondence with both practical and theoretical civil jurisprudence as well as accounting.

PROGRESS

• Capitalism means living by using property that yield goods during production to produce a surplus of another product and hoping to sell that surplus for a price such that the sum of sales exceeds the cost to gain those sales.
• Said another way, Capitalism means living by using capital in pursuit of ongoing exchange of buying power.
• Poverty is the default starting status for all humans.
• Bare subsistence means consuming as fast as producing.
• Tribalists the earth over, whether in history or in contemporary times live by bare subsistence precisely because they believe in communal ownership and reject property.
• All progress, which is the moving away from bare subsistence, which is another way of saying poverty, has come from shifting away from the tribe and toward the individual and specifically through property, which is the right of ownership and never the thing owned.
• The entire progress of people from the savage state of tribalism to clans and from clans to feudalism and from feudalism to burghers / bourgeois and thus individualism has been the advent of property (right of ownership) moving from all to the individual. And once property of the individual has been established, the furtherance of progress has arisen solely from the diminution and mitigation of uncertainty in the face of risk.
• Competitive commercialism has raised all of mankind through all time above bare subsistence.
• True progress comes from enlightened self-interest.

PROSPERITY

• People escape poverty and enter into authentic prosperity through efficiency of wanted production. 
• It is through efficiency that leads to surplus and surplus that creates credit that leads to exchange, lifting others to specialize and become efficient, which sows the seed for forever ongoing prosperity.

GOVERNMENT

• Government evolves from society. 
• Government springs forth to enlarge the circle of strangers in society of property.
• Never does society evolve from government. 
• Before government there is society. 
• As a creation of strangers of a society of property, government is supposed to exist only for protection and certification of property so that men can engage in trade, which is the purchase and sale of property, rather than war among each other. 
• Government is supposed to exist to protect any individual at random and his property from a mob, whether foreign or domestic, who seek to dispossess him from his property unjustly either through the of force stealing or through rhetoric.
• Government is supposed to exist to certify claims about property to ensure truth about property. 
• The necessity of government arises because of rogues who feign willing participation in society, a society of property.
• Defensive governance, the kind whereby men come into harmony to protect property and thus echo the goodness of nature, is the only justification for governance of any kind.
• Legit government is about the administration of justice. Justice arises in maintaining right and redressing wrongs.
• Laws are unneeded for justice. 
• Law is secondary and unessential.
• Men of government through law impose duties and rights upon strangers in society of property and well as themselves acting as the government.
• Some of those duties include paying income taxes. 
• Some of those rights include fulfilling greedy desires. 
• Through liability, anyone is free to pursue right of action in civil fraud. 
• Men of government reserve to themselves right of prosecution in criminal fraud.
• Liberties and rights are not the same. 
• Right and power are not the same. 
• These words are not synonyms under law. 
• Liberties are acts of doing what one pleases, acts one can do without being prevented by law. 
• The sphere of legal liberty is that sphere of activity within which law is content to leave oneself alone.
• Liberty is when the law allows to one's will a sphere of unrestrained activity. 
• Liberty is the absence of duty imposed upon oneself. 
• Liberty is what you may do innocently.
• Right is when law limits the liberty of others on one's behalf. 
• Right is what others must do on your behalf, that is, their duty.
• Power is what you can do effectively. 
• Power is when law assists one actively in making one's will effective.
• You use your liberties without protest from the law. 
• You enjoy your rights through law by controlling the acts of others for your behalf. 
• You use your powers with active assistance from the law in making itself the instrument of your will.  
• One with disability lacks power to determine the legal relations of others (authority) or the ability to determine one's own (capacity). 
• When politicians don't establish law giving themselves authority (power) to do X and then do X against anyone, they have violated your civil liberty.
• Customary rights deals with customary law, which is any rule of action to which men voluntarily conform their action. It involves de facto observance. 
• Customary rights of customary law do not have the nature of civil law since the essence of civil law is recognition of a state in the administration of justice.
• The absence of law in the presence of government is liberty, not anarchy. 
• Anarchy means no government at all. It means without (a) an overlord (archy). 

POLITICS

• Politics is the art of using rhetoric to steal property.
• All political doctrines are doctrines of control. 
• The spectrum of political doctrine looks like this, from Left to Right:Communism ↔ Socialism ↔ Syndicalism ↔ Oligopolism ↔ Fascism
• There is no room for individualism on that spectrum.
• The debate of political doctrines is debate about which property should be impaired or stolen, who must suffer the consequences and who gets to do the the stealing and impairing.

POLITICIANS

• Politicians and bureaucrats get their property by confiscating it from others.
• Politicians can only take by implied force from the efficient and dole to the inefficient.
• Never in the history of humans have politicians lifted people from poverty. 
• When the day comes that all others rid themselves of politicians is the day that mankind shall enter into Utopia.

RETROGRESSION

• Greed is wanting property in stuff without having to trade for such fairly. 
• It is greedy for anyone to seek buying power without producing wealth in surplus that others are willing to trade to get in a purchase and sale, under condition of honest dealing.
• The picture perfect definition of greed is striving to get something for nothing from someone else, without giving up something wanted in honest exchange or in honest trade of purchase and sale. 
• Getting welfare, getting subsidy, swindling people by fraud — all accurately express the concept of greed. 
• Welfare takers, subsidy takers, fraudsters, all share one driving trait, a trait that nullifies character within them. They are all greedy to the core.
• Today, government, the creature, has superseded its creators. 
• Illegitimate government usurps power and starts shuffling people's property against their wants for the sole purpose of maintaining power over all.
• Men of government through law grant rights to fulfill greedy desires as a means to secure and enlarge their grip on power.
• Expressions of right in fulfilling greedy desires include welfare taking and subsidy taking. 
• The more who are dependent on welfare and subsidy for their livelihood, the more support they give to those holding power.
• Specific examples of the greedy include recipients of TANF, SNAP, Section 8, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, farm subsidies, Pell Grants, all workers of agencies engaged in doling the former as well as all workers in agencies regulating industries, which inhibit new entrants through inhibition of capital formation. Such agencies include the FDA, SEC, FAA, FCC.
• Men of government through law impose liability for those who operate outside the framework of subsidy and welfare to fulfill their greedy demands. 
• In all forms of illegitimate government you see socialistic, bureaucratic welfare, which, immorally retards man's progress as it inhibits individuals who receive such welfare from discovering who they are and what are their talents. 
• All problems arise when some usurp power through government to advance themselves by stealing or impairing the property of others, rendering government no better than rogues.
• Through the power of specific welfare Crony Politics, Crony Governance and Crony Regulatory Capture arise.
• To overcome the Axiom of Profit, politicians give subsidy to politically-connected producers or give welfare in the form of buying power to some consumers.
• Without property, the bundle of rights that include possession, use, destruction, transfer and recovery from wrongful possession, there cannot can not be liberty.
• Activist governance, the kind whereby politicians can dictate what one can do with property, reduces property to mere privilege. 
• At bedrock, activist governance is what is wrong with American life today.

IGNORING THE FOREGOING

• Without learning that wages are prices, that profits provide surplus buying power to buy anything else, that prices provide signals for potential return to increasing capitalization to gain efficiency and higher profit, that capital is the property of production and that wealth is the property of purchase and sale, no one can profit.
• Without trade, no one can know about money and credit and how central bank action affects the measure of their contracts as well as their saved buying power. 
• Without trade and theoretical civil jurisprudence, no one can know how taxation-provided welfare violates the social compact. 
• Without trade and history, no one can can know how welfare is the source of power, which lets politicians wage foreign wars of weapons and domestic wars of law against citizens.

IN THE END

• Mankind advances through individuals, property and the drive to hedge against loss and that alone. 
• Mankind falls into retrogression when reverting to neo-tribalism in whatever form, such as self-conceit, pseudo-scientific socialism or totalitarian socialism, which all know as communism.

YOU

• By accepting what others have told you as your beliefs, whether they had innocent or sinister motivation, you have lost all reign over yourself. 
• These beliefs that your imagination has inspired with power over yourself are ghosts who haunt you and control your soul, your self, your being.
• Being indoctrinated has been called the false self by many sages over time.
• When you take public opinions as your own, you let the world live within you. You stop living for yourself.
• You becomes possessed by others.
• Duty is faux virtue. 
• Conduct undertaken for show never could be virtue.
• Taking what another says is your shame if you reject doing what they claim is your duty is to enslave your free will.
• It is to stop living for yourself.
• There are many who claim they know what is your duty better than what you know for yourself to be true.
• You lack duty to fight the wrongful wars started by politicians.
• You lack duty to pay the bills of others.
• You must buck the crowd and do what others are not doing.
• Never should you imitate anyone.
• Imitation forces you to be self-conscious, fretting over whether or not you are imitating right.
• You must come to see the Bizarro Theater all around you.
• When you are dominated, when you let yourself get controlled by outside influences, you have lost the way. 
• You have become a zombie.
• An exorcism rids you of specters, shadowy tempters, ghosts of control, demons which haunt you.
• You can start over.
• You can make yourself anew.
• You can rescue yourself from errors of thought and action.
• You can trade your lesser motives for an all-encompassing motive.
• You must rise up and gain your independence.
• You gain independence by believing from your beliefs rather than trying to believe from thoughts given to you from others, their thoughts trying to masquerade as your beliefs.
• You must reject prevailing opinions, prevailing customs, conventionality. 
• You must reject the pull to adhere to the ethos. 
• You must reject conformity.
• You must become loyal to yourself.
• You must become a crypto-independent. 

Read more ...

INCOME TAXATION. IT'S THEFT.

Can you imagine if every businesswoman demanded 50% of your income to sell you a bag of groceries? You could only eat for a few days.

You gain your wages by selling your capital, which are your skills through time. After you pay your living expenses, what remains from your wages is your profit. 

All income taxation is a share of profits unearned by the taxer. For those not collecting welfare, politicians have not invested in you. Politicians have not given you cash in hopes of a return on investment. 

Politicians already collect way too much from you. Is 35% not enough? Is 50% not enough? So few question when politicians take from anyone 50% of her or his income through income taxation through federal and state means.

Involuntary income taxation is nothing more than theft of a man or woman's time and as such taxing anyone's life and hence is a kind of slavery.

How much do politicians need? 

Read more ...