For decades, a graffiti vandal who goes by the name Banksy has vandalized walls of buildings in which he lacks any property.
In short, Banksy lacks the right to paint upon the walls of buildings he does. Further, Banks has a duty to not vandalize the walls of buildings in which others have property, which is the right of ownership and never the thing owned.
Recently, Banksy vandalized the wall of someone's building Folkestone, England. Another vandal took it upon himself or herself to better Banksy's work of vandalism by adding a drawn penis upon it.
Brits everywhere have decried the work of the second vandal as horrific vandalism destroying the work of vandalism by Banksy. How is that for a bit of irony?
Some have taken to Twitter, tweeting such foolery as "Only in #Folkstone could a #Banksy be vandalisesd."
Here is the improved work of Banksy's vandalism:
Here is a photo of Banksy's original destruction:
According to Brits, everyone should have thought vandalism throughout NYC in the low point of NYC as artwork:
Enjoy a ride through graffiti ghettos of New York City.
And the decline of Britain continues as evidenced by the way Brits believe.