Friday, March 4, 2016


So there is this 32-year old Ben Shapiro who writes for Breitbart, Town Hall and other places.

Today, Benny spends his writing time writing against Donald Trump. However, back in 2011, Benny had nothing but praise for Trump (see:  The Magic of Donald Trump by Ben Shapiro). Here are Benny's 2011 thoughts on Trump:

"Is Donald Trump the best Republican candidate for president out there? It would be tough to argue otherwise." ~ Ben Shapiro 
"In the last several weeks, that ideal Republican candidate has materialized. His name is Donald Trump. His slogan is ready-made: "You're Fired." He does not give a damn what the media thinks of him...He can self-fund to the tune of $1 billion...And what's more, he can win." ~ Ben Shapiro 
"Trump has across-the-board appeal. He even has union support -- he's made a political mint bashing outsourcing..." ~ Ben Shapiro
"Trump's image boils down to this: he's a no-nonsense businessman ..." ~ Ben Shapiro 
"[Trump] has the makings of a breakout star; he's got bravado and the cash to back it up. If he really runs, he won't have any trouble finding supporters." ~ Ben Shapiro

In that 2011 work, before Shapiro mentioned Trump, Shapiro identified the qualities needed for a winner:

"If Republicans were to construct an ideal candidate, he would have to be rich beyond belief...The ideal Republican candidate would have significant name recognition with the general public...The ideal Republican candidate would have stage presence, an intimidation factor, and a willingness to play dirty." ~ Ben Shapiro

Trump has the same qualities today Shapiro claimed were needed in 2011. So is Shapiro confused? Does Shapiro not know what qualities a candidate needs?

27-year old Benny believed he was so right about Trump and now 32-year old Benny believes he is right about Trump. Of course, it is not about being right or wrong about the person.

For 32-year old Benny to be right, Benny would need to disavow his claims about what qualities a candidate needs.  Yet, if 32-year old Benny does so, Benny would reveal himself to be stupid about matters of politics. And thus, Benny would need to find a new line of work.

So what changed 27-year old Benny into 32-year old Benny? Without doubt, Benny did not become smarter.

As a self-identifying Orthodox Jew, likely Shapiro is one of those dippy, Israel first, neocons, you know, those ex-Democratic Party Jews who are crypto-Zionists — and no, this is not a conspiracy theory claim. If this is so, that would make Shapiro among those internationalists who pushes a pro-massive immigration agenda for the USA.

In the same 2011 work, Shapiro had this to say about Mitt Romney, "Mitt Romney has about as much charm as a Ziploc bag, and his support for Romneycare in Massachusetts should immediately put him out of the running."

Yet, on March 2, 2016, Shapiro had this to write for the Daily Wire:

"Donald Trump’s yuge Super Tuesday win means that the Republican Smart Set™ have decided to unleash the big guns. Romney is now scheduled to speak at the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah, [delivering] a full-scale assault on Trump...Which is fine. I’ve done it myself."

Mitt Romney has come out to attack Donald Trump even though Mitt Romney has yet to announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination. Yet, back in 2012, Romney sought the nomimation and likely campaign funds of Donald Trump.

Like 27-year old Benny Shapiro, 65-year old Mitt Romney believed Donald Trump to have genius about the US economy:

"Donald Trump has shown an extraordinary ability to understand how our economy works, to create jobs for the American people. He's done it here in Nevada. He's done it  across the country. He understand that our economy is facing threats from abroad. He is one of the few people who stood up and said, 'China has been cheating. They have taken jobs from Americans. They have not played fair. We have to have a president who stands up to cheaters. We believe in free trade and free enterprise. But we do not believe in allowing people to cheat day in and day out."
But now, 69-year old Romney believes otherwise. Yet, Trump's stance is the same today was it was in 2012.

For 69-year old Romney to be right, Mitty would need to disavow the claims 65-year old Mitty made about Trump. Yet, if Mitty were to do this, Mitty would need to acknowledge that he does not understand anything about the US economy and commerce.

Watch Romney speak his praise-filled words for Trump with ease and conviction:

All should recall that Mitt Romney was the failed Republican candidate who lost to Obama in 2012. Romney once worked as the Governor of Massachusetts and as such, saddled the people of Massachusetts with the horrible Romneycare, the model for Obamacare.

Mitt Romney's family have been cultists for generations. Mitt Romney believes that an angel named Moroni came to earth and gave an upstate New York hick non-existent golden tablets with the Book of Mormon written up those.

While I am no fan of Bill Maher, at least Bill gets it right about the biggest cult in the USA:

George W. Romney, Mitt's dad, ran for the presidency in 1968. And like illegal candidate of today, the natural-born Canadian-Cuban Ted Cruz (see: Natural-born Canadian, Ted Cruz), George W. Romney was an illegal Mexican candidate for the U.S. presidency.

George W. Romney was born in Mexico, in Colonia Dublán, Galeana, Chihuahua. Thus, Mitt's dad was not a natural-born American. Mitt's great-grandfather was noted polygamist, Helaman Pratt, the son of Parley P. Pratt, one of the co-founders of the Mormon cult.

As a grown-up cultist, Romney's dad was hired to run the newly formed American Motors and promptly ran it into the ground. Roy D. Chapin, Jr., had to be hired by the board of directors to try to save the firm that Mitt's idiotic dad trashed.

Like many business failures, George W. Romney straightaway went into politics and became governor of Michigan. George W. Romney barely won. Romney won by 80,000 votes and ended a fourteen-year rule by the Democrats.

How did George Romney win? Someone smart helped Romney get elected. George Romney's strategists had George Romney appeal to independent voters and suburbanites of Detroit, were more likely to vote Republican than the heavily Democratic residents of the city itself.

Mitt Romney was too stupid himself to run with the strategy against Obama in 2012. Interestingly, Trump is using the same strategy as George Romney used in 1962 to win the governorship of Michigan.


Mitt Romney wants Brazilians, Chinese, Indians, Indonesians and Mexicans to become $12 an hour workers. Mitt's vision requires Americans to become $12 an hour workers. Should you care if Brazilians, Chinese, Indians, Indonesians or Mexicans rise up to become $12 an hour workers if Americans fall to become $12 an hour workers?

Idiots like Mitt Romney want to flood the USA with third world low IQ, never-going-to-be-skilled workers who do not speak English to depress wages. Mitt Romney wants skilled working-class Americans to commit economic suicide (see: AMERICANS ARE COMMITTING (ECONOMIC) SUICIDE DAILY WITH IPHONES AND IPADS). Mitt wants this because Mitt Romney does not understand commerce how capitalism works, at all (see: COMMERCIAL REALITY. A CRASH-COURSE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW IT ALL WORKS).

Main Street Americans will not lead the world in the 21st century if domestic capitalism gets crushed in favor of internationalist capitalism. Sure, the billionaires of the USA will get even richer. However, wage rates for Americans will fall continuously until those wage rates match the poor in Brazil, in China, in India, in Indonesia, in Vietnam.

Ronald Reagan's version for the Republican Party was loathed by the Rockefeller Northeastern Republicans who held control of the party. People like George Romney loathed Reagan.

Those Northeastern Republicans lost control of the party to Ronald Reagan. They since gained control under George Herbert Walker Bush. Mitt's vision for Americans is Bush's kinder, gentler, New World Order, equalized global wage rates, which is another way of saying, universal poverty.

If voting Republican means voting for anti-USA losers like Bushes — George, George Jr., and huge losers like the Mormon cultist Mitt, then why vote Republican, ever?

Read more ...
Blogger Tricks

Wednesday, March 2, 2016


Marco Rubio managed to win the primary in Minnesota. The win netted Rubio one more delegate than the Canadian-Cuban Ted Cruz who is running an illegal campaign (see: THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES) and four more delegates than billionaire businessman Donald Trump.

Minnesota results:

  • 38 delegates
  • Rubio won 
  • Rubio, 14 delegates; Cruz, 13; Trump, 10
  • Rubio 1.08:1 over Cruz 
  • Rubio 1.4:1 over Trump

Ted Cruz the junior senator from Texas managed to win his home state of Texas.

Texas results:

  • 155 delegates
  • Cruz won 
  • Cruz, 99 delegates; Trump, 33; Rubio, 3
  • Cruz 3:1 over Trump
  • Cruz 33:1 over Rubio
In three states combined, Alaska, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Cruz managed to net one delegate more than Trump though trump won Arkansas.

Alaska results:

  • 28 delegates
  • Cruz won 
  • Cruz, 12 delegates; Trump, 11; Rubio, 5
  • Cruz 1.09:1 over Trump
  • Cruz 2.4:1 over Rubio

Oklahoma results:

  • 43 delegates
  • Cruz won 
  • Cruz, 14 delegates; Trump, 12; Rubio, 11
  • Cruz 1.17:1 over Trump
  • Cruz 1.27:1 over Rubio

Donald Trump won the majority of delegates from Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Massachusetts,  Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia.

Arkansas results:

  • 40 delegates
  • Trump won 
  • Trump, 16; Cruz, 14 delegates; Rubio, 9
  • Trump 1.14:1 over Cruz
  • Trump 1.77:1 over Rubio

Alabama results:

  • 50 delegates
  • Trump won
  • Trump, 36 delegates; Cruz, 13; Rubio, 1
  • Trump 2.77:1 over Cruz
  • Trump 36:1 over Rubio

Georgia results:

  • 76 delegates
  • Trump won
  • Trump, 40 delegates; Rubio, 14; Cruz, 18
  • Trump 2.86:1 over Rubio
  • Trump 2.22:1 over Cruz

Massachusetts results:

  • 42 delegates
  • Trump won 
  • Trump, 22 delegates; Kasich, 8; Rubio, 8; Cruz, 4
  • Trump 2.75:1 over Kasich
  • Trump 2.78:1 over Rubio
  • Trump 5.5:1 over Cruz

Tennessee results:

  • 58 delegates
  • Trump won
  • Trump, 31 delegates; Cruz, 14; Rubio, 9
  • Trump 2.21:1 over Cruz
  • Trump 3.4:1 over Rubio

Vermont results:

  • 16 delegates
  • Trump won
  • Trump, 6 delegates; Kasich, 6
  • Trump 1:1 over Kasich

Virginia results:

  • 49 delegates
  • Trump won
  • Trump, 17 delegates; Rubio, 16; Cruz, 8; Kasich, 5; Carson, 3
  • Trump 1.06:1 over Rubio
  • Trump 2.125:1 over Cruz
  • Trump 3.4:1 over Kasich
  • Trump 5.67:1 over Carson

So how much do the candidates need to spend to win the nomination? Note: The spending is in the billions. So Ted Cruz would need to spend $90 million vs Donald Trump who would need to spend $40 million at this pace. Rubio would needs to spend $465 million and Kasich, $756 million.

Read more ...

Wednesday, February 24, 2016


Organizers and followers of a black racist movement coined a slogan to identify themselves — Black Lives Matter. By shoving their slogan in the faces of Americans everywhere, they have triggered many Americans to counter with their own slogans such as All Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter, the latter which supports the police.

The problem comes down to English. Had only the organizers said any of these, they might have attracted much support from most Americans:

  • Black lives matter too. 
  • Black lives matter as well.
  • Black lives matter also.
  • Black lives matter likewise.
  • Black lives matter similarly.

Omission of that little adverb makes all the difference.

In MOOKIE SPIKE LEE NEVER CAN DO THE RIGHT THING. THE EVIL STUPIDITY OF BLACKISM AND THE POLITICS BLACKS NEED MOST. #BLACKSSORACIST, I showed you the horrible doctrine of blackism. The organizers of Black Lives Matter are using the standard tactic of all social justice warriors in the USA to support their blackism. In AHAB MOBY DICK RACISM. WHAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT IS ALL ABOUT — HUNTING THE GREAT WHITE MALE, I revealed the rhetorical tactic of all of these racists.

True racism means living by preventing another from trading property for property through law or through collusion because of another's race — being one of people of common descent. Adherents of racism organize into groups based on arbitrary characteristics such as skin color (blacks), other-than English language spoken (Hispanics/Latinos), sexual preferences (gays) or sex (feminists) and then seek superior rights to gain property (right of ownership).
Racists have groups like the NAACP, La Raza, Act Up! and NOW.

Americans of European descent (see: HEART OF EUROPE? ARE GREEKS EVEN EUROPEAN?), so-called "whites" aren't organized into any group. There is no group of whites who live through law or through collusion by preventing others from trading property for property.

In Everett Dean Martin's work Behavior of Crowds, which the hate group the Southern Poverty Law Center adapted for their 1920 pamphlet, The Mob Mind vs Civil Liberty, Martin described factions known as struggle groups.

The Black Lives Matter faction is yet another racist struggle group in the USA fighting in the perpetual civil war of the USA. War always comes down to gaining property in the possessions of others whether through guns and bullets or through politics.

Read more ...

Sunday, February 21, 2016


This was such an easy call from the beginning. Margaret Thatcher called it for me a long time ago. Watch Thatcher talk about conviction vs consensus to know why Trump has it.


Here are a collection of links from Bizarro Theater since the beginning of 2015. Anyone who read me consistently could see why the Trump Revolution could happen.

Working-class Americans are Done with Globalization:

✘ bad trade deals that send manufacturing jobs to Mexico and China because  the return to capital at home is killed for the small factory owner
✘  the loss of small and medium sized employers

Working-class Americans are Done with Immigration:

✘ immigration, especially third world (non-white) immigration as well as illegal immigration
✘ the big lie that illegals take the jobs Americans won't do

Working-class Americans are Done with Mohammadans — Americans See Too Much Evidence: 9/11, Fort Hood, San Bernardino, the horde in Europe, ISIS, Obama

Working-class Americans are Done with Obama:

(White) Americans are Done with Social(ist) Liberal Political Correctness and Pandering to Minorities:

✘ black lives matter
✘ massive amounts of black crime — gun murders — as the excuse to violate the second amendment
✘ safe spaces and ridiculous feminism
✘ quotas for employment and college admissions
✘ extra welfare for skin-colored people
✘ rampant government corruption with government workers now getting paid more than private sector workers

Working-class Americans are Done with The Gay War:

✘ the big gay army of homosexists, most of whom are heterosexuals enlisted and indoctrinated to push the gay agenda
✘ forced association with the fringe population of homosexuals

Working-class Americans are Done with the Relentless Attacks on the Protestant Christian Origins of the USA and How Protestant Christians Made America the Greatest Sovereignty on Earth

Working-class Americans are Done with Mainstream Media Deception:

Working-class Americans are Done with Celebrities:

✘ moronic actors of Hollywood as the mouthpieces of both globalization and political correctness

Working-class Americans are Done with Government and Media Lying Propaganda about the Economy:

Working-class Americans are Done with World Figureheads like the Pope:

Working-class Americans are Done with False, Libertine Deception:

Working-class Americans are Done with Illegal Political candidates:

Working-class Americans are Done with Sellout Politicians:

Working-class Americans are Done with Establishment Politics:

Read more ...

Saturday, February 20, 2016


Pro-American restorationist candidate Trump slaughtered his rivals for the GOPher party delegates in South Carolina today. Trump has secured all 50 delegates from South Carolina. That is a scathing win.

Trump's victory continues to surprise pundits but not Americans who have suffered since the collapse of peak GDP, which came in the fourth quarter of 2007. Since then American families have been wrecked by lengthened unemployment and lower wages.


Trump managed to win South Carolina by only spending $35,600 each delegate. Rubio spent $12,050,000 and came up empty as did Ted Cruz who spent $7,070,000.

As well, Trump has spent the fewest dollars spent for each delegate. As a successful billionaire businessman, this should surprise no one. Trump knows how to process intel about markets.

Trump is much smarter at politics than the professional politicians.Politicians are wasteful. Politicians rely upon leeching consultants. Politicians are not smart.

After New Hampshire, I wrote that Jeb Bush was not viable as a candidate. South Carolina proved my claim. So it is no surprise that Jeb did Americans a favor and dropped out tonight.

Jeb was on pace to spend $26.7 billion to win the nomination. No nomination has ever required that much spending. Jeb spent 135 times more for each of his delegates than Donald Trump spent.

As can be seen, Marco Rubio is on pace to spend $6.9 billion to win the nomination. That insane sum of spending will not win Rubio the presidency. Rubio is not a viable candidate and needs to drop out.

Canadian natural-born Ted Cruz and illegal candidate (see: my works on Ted Cruz to know why cannot swear the oath of office of the presidency) would need to spend 8.6 times more than Donald Trump to win the nomination. That kind of spending would push the illegal candidate Cruz to about $1.7 billion.

Donald Trump would need to spend $162.1 million to win the nomination. This is a reasonable sum and well below what either Hillary Clinton ($1.118 billion) or Bernie Sanders ($924 million) must spend to win their Democratic Party nomination.

As I shared with you in THE LAST GASPS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. WHAT REINCE PRIEBUS MUST DO TO RESCUE THE INTERNATIONALIST GLOBALIZATION GOPHER PARTY FROM THE DONALD TRUMP JUGGERNAUT, GO ALL IN WITH JOHN KASICH, if the GOPher Party establishment does not want to work with Trump, their best shot at beating Trump going forward is to back Kasich, in spite of tonight's results.

Also, beware of false political polls trying to take down Trump. Rupert Murdoch tried to do with his Wall Street Journal. There is much false polling relying upon unscientific methods. For more on that, see THE AUGUSTA CHRONICLE, NBC TV, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL AND MARIST COLLEGE ENGAGE IN POLLING DECEPTION FOR THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PRIMARY

The Democratic Party held a caucus in Nevada today. The wife of former president Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton snagged four more delegates than socialist Bernie Sanders.

Though Hillary Clinton won, the race was close. A close race doesn't bode well for Hillary. If Bernie could spend more, he could tip the balance in his favor. 

Hillary spent $196,579 each delegate while Bernie spent 2.58 times more than Hillary, having spent $507,333 each delegate. 

Both candidates are on pace to spend around one billion dollars to secure the nomination. 

The Democratic Party held a caucus on 

Delegates nominate. Primaries and caucuses exist to secure delegates for the nomination.

According to The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process by the Council on Foreign Relations:

In 2016, a Democratic candidate must secure at least 2,382 out of 4,763 delegates to become the party’s nominee. The number of delegates allocated to each state takes into account the state’s Democratic vote in the previous three presidential elections and its assigned number of Electoral College votes.
Meanwhile, a Republican candidate must secure at least 1,237 out of 2,472 delegates to win the party’s nomination. The Republican Party allocates each state ten delegates, plus three for each congressional district, and bonus delegates for states that contributed electoral votes to the party in the previous presidential election, as well those that elected Republicans to high offices.

Read more ...


Two recent surveys on the eve of the South Carolina Republican Primary reveal significant flaws such, which invalidate the results.

The principal owner of the Wall Street Journal happens to be Rupurt Murdoch. Murdoch is the principal owner of FOX News. Murdoch seems to be against the candidacy of Donald Trump. Perhaps this is why his survey uses flawed methods.

As it is, already, in THE DES MOINES REGISTER AND BLOOMBERG COMMIT POLLING FRAUD ON DECEMBER 12, 2015, FOR THE UPCOMING GOP CAUCUS and WHY EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION POLL FOR 2016 YOU SHALL SEE OR HEAR WILL BE WRONG, I have shown you significant flaws in how polling has been done, especially for nationwide polls

Let's look at two wrong polls.

The Augusta Chronicle

Claimed Result: Trump 27, Rubio 24, Cruz 19, Bush 11, Kasich 7, Carson 8
Claimed Winner Margin: Trump +3
Status: Invalid survey results
Why?: The sample is not drawn at random from telephone numbers who then get qualified first as adults, then as likely voters. Assertion of definitely voting and exclusion based on lack of recall of polling station tainted sample.

Flawed Methodology: Likely Republican primary voters were selected at random from a list of registered voters. Only voters determined likely to attend the 2016 South Carolina Republican primary were included in the sample.

Two questions served as selection variables. The first question asked whether the respondent intends to attend the primary on February 20th; all responses other than “definitely” or “voted absentee” were excluded from the dataset. The
second question asked whether the respondent knew where their primary will be held (e.g. church, school); all responses of “I don’t know” (for those who did not vote absentee) were excluded from the dataset.


Claimed Result: Trump 28, Rubio 15, Cruz 23, Bush 13, Kasich 9, Carson 9
Claimed Winner Margin: Trump +5
Status: Invalid survey results
Why?: The sample is not drawn from the first adult contacted regardless of sex. Instead, the survey targeted the youngest male first.

As well, the randomness of the survey became further eroded when matching against another sample with embedded error.

Also the survey is spread over a few days, which calls into question voting based on different news about candidates.

Flawed Methodology:
This survey of 2,567 adults was conducted February 15th through February 17th, 2016 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded in partnership with NBC News and The Wall Street Journal. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the state of South Carolina were interviewed in English by telephone using live interviewers.

Landline telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the state of South Carolina from ASDE Survey Sampler, Inc. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. To increase coverage, this landline sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of cell phone numbers from Survey Sampling International.

Respondents in the household were randomly selected by first asking for the youngest male. 

Both samples were matched by telephone number to a voter registration list for the state. Voter information was appended to each matched case. Assistance was provided by Luce Research for data collection and L2 for voter registration information.

After the interviews were completed, the two samples were combined and balanced to reflect the 2013 American Community Survey 5-year estimates for age, gender, income, and region except for race, which is from the 2010 census.

Results are statistically significant within ±1.9 percentage points. There are 2,282 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within ±2.1 percentage points.  Among registered voters, 823 had a phone match in the voter file and 1,459 did not. The results for these subsets are statistically significant within ±3.4 percentage points and ±2.6 percentage points, respectively. There are 1,227 voters in the potential Republican primary electorate. The potential Republican primary electorate in South Carolina includes all voters who prefer to vote in the Republican presidential primary and those who identify as Republicans or Republican leaning independents without a primary preference.

There are 836 voters in the potential Democratic primary electorate. The potential Democratic primary electorate in South Carolina includes all voters who prefer to vote in the Democratic presidential primary and those who identify as Democrats or Democratic leaning independents without a primary preference. The results for these subsets are statistically significant within ±2.8 percentage points and ±3.4 percentage points, respectively.

There are 722 likely Republican primary voters and 425 likely Democratic primary voters defined by a probability turnout model which determines the likelihood respondents will participate in the 2016 South Carolina Republican/Democratic Presidential Primary based upon their chance of vote, interest in the election, and past election participation. The results for these subsets are statistically significant within ±3.6 percentage points and ±4.8 percentage points, respectively. The error margin was not adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.


The SC House GOP has done polling right.

Claimed Result: Trump 34, Rubio 18, Cruz 19, Bush 12, Kasich 8, Carson 5
Claimed Winner Margin: Trump +15
Why?: Respondents were contacted on the same day. The questions were asked in the same way. The calls were placed at random. The first adult contacted was the accepted contact.

Solid Methodology:

Likely Republican presidential primary voters were selected at random from a list of registered voters based on party participation and registration date. Household ages and locations were extracted as well from this list. In excess of 180,000 households were called over the duration of the poll. Each household participant was asked to opt-in to the survey if they planned to vote in the 2016 SC presidential primary.                                                                            

Using automated voice response technology allows each participant to hear the questions exactly the same way, from the same voice, spoken with the same tone and nuance. Calls are placed to randomly-selected phone numbers through a stratified process that insures approrpiate geographic representation. These calls were placed from 10:30am to 8:30pm local time on Thursday, February 18th.

Read more ...

Thursday, February 18, 2016


“A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian." ~ Francis, Theocratic President of Vatican City & Religious Leader of the Holy See
Today, the religious leader of the Roman Catholics decreed what is akin to a fatwa — a ruling on a point of Islamic law given by a recognized authority. In the Pope's case, he issued a Catholic-fatwa — a ruling on a point of Catholic indoctrination by Frankie himself.

With his Catholic-fatwa, the Roman Catholic Church boss Francis attacked Donald Trump. When commenting about Trump's stance on illegal aliens coming into the USA and committing violent crimes, Francis said, “I say only that this man is not Christian if he has said things like that.”

Trump replied, "For a religious leader to question a person's faith is disgraceful. I'm proud to be a Christian. And as president, I will not allow Christianity to be consistently attacked and weakened, unlike what is happening now with our current president.".

Anyone who claims that someone else doesn't love Jesus and believe Jesus died for every man and woman's sins isn't sharing the gospel. Since Trump believes in Jesus and loves Jesus, Trump has the gospel right.

The good news — good spell, hence gospel — about Jesus is so easy and clear. Yet, most religious men fail to preach it much less understand it.


Francis doesn't understand Jesus and does not speak for Jesus. Of this, all can be sure.

Let's let Jesus speak on the matter of the Pope vs Trump:

"Condemn not, so that you may not be condemned. For according the sentence you pronounce, you yourself be convicted; and with same measure with which you measure, you will be measured." ~ Matthew 7:1-2

And more:

"But why do you take notice the dust in your brother's eye, you cannot observe the chip in own eye? or how can you say your brother, 'Let me remove the from your eye,' while the chip is your own eye? Pretender! First remove the chip from your own eye, and then you will see straight to remove the dust from the eye of brother." ~ Matthew 7:3-5 

And now let's see what Jesus would say about Pope Francis and the Roman Catholic Church as he runs it and as it has been run by all the preceding popes:
"But guard yourselves from false teachers, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but who in hearts are plundering wolves. You can recognise them by their fruits. Do they ever gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles? Thus every useful tree produces useful fruit; but the worthless tree produces worth less fruit. A useful tree cannot produce bad fruit; nor can a worthless tree produce good fruit. Every tree not producing good fruit will be felled and used as firewood. Reject their produce; for by this you can recognize them." ~ Matthew 7:15-20

"Not every one who says to Me, 'Master! Master! will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven;  but only those who do the will of My Father Who is in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Master! Master! have we not preached in Your Name? and have we not cast out demons in Your Name and in Your Name have we not done many wonders?' And then I shall declare to them, 'I never knew you depart from Me you traders in lawlessness!'" ~ Matthew 7:21-23

Read more ...

Wednesday, February 17, 2016


Read more ...


Recently, black entertainers have taken to the Internet and television to decry the awards given to those who produce motion pictures. Their rallying cry is an Internet hashtag, #Oscarssowhite.

What is the flip side to #Oscarssowhite? Why does a guy like Spike Lee care so much about getting rewards from whites? It is as if Spike Lee seeks praise from whites as a means to self-validation.
"Look, look massah. I done good. I done made this here picture show jes like you good white folk do. So hows bouts gimme me ones youse statues? Please massah, please."
Guys like Spike Lee simply lack intellects needed for deep contemplation on such matters. Worse, hobbled by inferior intellects, guys like Spike Lee engage in little more than blackism.

Would Spike Lee prefer blaxsploitation type dialogue and roles in movies? Would the rest of us?

If Spike Lee cared about his people, Spike Lee would only tell black stories with full black casts, made by all-black crews and only shown in Magic Johnson theaters.

Now, because of #Oscarssowhite, who can believe if Denzel Washington really won or he was given an Affirmative Action Oscar? Were the Oscars of Jamie Foxx, Forest Whitaker, Halle Berry, Jennifer Hudson, Mo'Nique, Octavia Spencer  and  Lupita Nyong'o merely Affirmative Action Oscars? Suspiciously, all of them supposedly won theirs during the 2000s. 

Did Steven Rodney McQueen and John Ridley win their Affirmative Action Oscars for Best Picture and Adapted Screenplay for 12 Years a Slave merely because a slavery themed movie would automatically win in the same way an AIDS movie or gay movie would win (Dallas Buyers Club, Philadelphia, Milk)? 

No longer can I believe that any Oscar won in the 2000s by Americans with swarthy skin are legitimate wins. Because of #oscarssowhite, I can only believe those Oscars were Affirmative Action gifts.

Did Steven Rodney McQueen and John Ridley win their Affirmative Action Oscars for Best Picture and Adapted Screenplay for 12 Years a Slave merely because a slavery themed movie would automatically win in the same way an AIDS movie or gay movie would win (Dallas Buyers Club, Philadelphia, Milk)? 

No longer can I believe that any Oscar won in the 2000s by Americans with swarthy skin are legitimate wins. Because of #oscarssowhite, I can only believe those Oscars were Affirmative Action gifts.

Blackism is a horrible doctrine. Until Americans see themselves as full-fledged citizens and individuals first, nothing with change for them.

Indian Reservations have been a bad deal for tribal Americans. Ben Franklin wanted to admit tribal Americans into the union as co-equal states. Yet look how it turned out for them.

Anyone who is a slave-descendant American need only look to tribal Americans to see the error in segregation of any kind, whether by treaty, force or self-imposed. Blackism is self-imposed segregation forged under mythical sub-cultural bonds that don't exist.

Slave-descendant Americans need to awaken to their individualism and reject blackism. Blackism that has arisen from the civil rights movement has been a hex upon slave-descendant Americans. Its latest iteration — #blacklivesmatter, space spaces — only is driving slave-descendant Americans further into a trap from which they won't escape.

Blackism is the chief cause of poverty among blacks in the USA. Poverty isn't caused by a lack of cash. It's caused by a lack of trust of your fellow man, the kind of trust you need to foster economic growth thru credit.

The only way blacks are ever going to be given the skills, the mindset needed to escape poverty is if the black subculture gets eradicated in the USA. Instead, its been encouraged to flourish since the 1960s. Since the 1960s, so-called blacks have put themselves on the path of American Indian. They have isolated themselves. They continue to attack the mass of individuals, wrongly labeling each of us as racist.

Until blacks ditch their subculture / counterculture and embrace individualism, they will continue to struggle. It's impossible to be in society — free association — with all who seek that when some organize into a group, a cult — in this case blackhood — in an exclusionary manner.

And to this day, it is shame to Congress for flooding the USA with Mexicans and illegal Mexicans and other illegals from Central America without taking care of our first nations people.

Slave-descendant Americans need to reject blackism and embrace the surest path to raising themselves up — a deportation of all illegal aliens, a moratorium on all legal immigration not for months, but perhaps years, and cancellation of all works visas in the USA.

Illegal immigration and excessive legal immigration has only undermined the livelihoods of Americans who claim to be black.

True racism is the doctrine of those who organize into a group based on an arbitrary characteristic such as skin color (blacks), other-than English language spoken (Hispanics/Latinos), sexual preferences (gays) or sex (feminists) and then who seek superior rights. 

Racism is civil war by other means. Racists seek to acquire the property (right of ownership) by force as all do who engage in war. True racists strive to prevent those they oppose from trading property for property either through law or through collusion because of race — being one of people of common descent.

Racism will end when racists ditch their respective racist groups — blacks, Hispanics, gays, feminists — and when individuals pressure politicians as law givers to stop giving extra rights to those who become part of these racist groups.

Watch the best "black" actor ever, Kirk Lazarus.

Read more ...


The Great White Male is the great white whale, the Moby Dick for all racists and feminists. They're all Captain Ahabs.

Their template is the same:

  • [Group X] is a worthy cultural contributor.
  • [Group X] has a history of oppression.
  • Through their economic and political dominance, white males have been the oppressors of [Group X].
  • Therefore, [Group X] needs reparations.
  • And White Males need to be stripped of economic power and political power.

You can put any name for Group X — blacks, chicanos, women, homosexual men, homosexual women — and the argument always works.

I devised that template from extrapolating what I saw bleeding into the Internet back in 1996 from 20-somethings who were fresh from hearing preaching and sermons from their university professors. That template works for Afro-American Studies, Latino Studies, Women's Studies, LGBT Studies, Asian-American Studies, you name it.

That should go to you show you that such academic programs and departments are little more than political agencies of leftist Marxism masquerading as higher education.

Every group you can imagine more than for themselves is against one group — white males, straight white males, mostly.

  • NAACP are against white males more than for themselves. 
  • NOW are against white males more than for themselves. 
  • La Raza are against white males more than for themselves. 

Even white females are against white males. They know they can breed with males of any race. They too see the great white male as their Moby Dick.

Social justice warriors are leftists who leverage feminism, blackism, Hispanicism, homosexism (political homosexuality). Their goal is to eradicate heterosexual white males. Their chief strategy is to label their anointed adversary — white males — as racists. One of their many tactics is to stifle any dissent by saying any speech that questions their motives or agenda is politically incorrect “hate speech.”

Another tactic is to claim white males derive privilege merely from being white and male. That is why they say "Check your privilege." 

And thus, they rely upon the template to claim white males perpetrated social injustice against themselves or those alike to them in the past. They try to appeal to the innate sense of fairness — its fair to divide a pie equally among everyone — to agitate for what they claim is social justice. Social justice takes typical get expressed as reparation or quotas, in short, anything that advances themselves at the expense of others most of whom are white males.

Quite often, their arguments rely upon the fallacy of consensus gentium. Mostly, they leverage peer pressure, particularly the fear of being outcast from the group for not accepting the group ethos.

As I showed you in THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS THE MOST DANGEROUS HATE GROUP IN THE USA TODAY. KEEP YOUR DAUGHTERS AWAY FROM THEM., Social Justice Warriors use the same method used by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Everett Dean Martin knew all about the machination of evil groups way back in 1920 as he reveals in his work Behavior of Crowds.

As stated above, their goal is to rid themselves of white guys. Yet, only dead white guys and specifically, dead Protestant Christian white guys founded and created the United States of America. No other persons did. Women didn't. Blacks didn't. Hispanics didn't.

King James authorized all of the colonization of America. King James was a white guy and now is a dead white. King James was a Church of Scotland, Church of England Christian Protestant guy. United States history is really a combined history of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, colonial America and the United States itself. And it's almost exclusively a history of dead white guys, almost all of whom were Protestant Christians.


The dead Protestant white guys of the British Enlightenment were the ones who promoted freedom and individualism.

Everywhere the earth over and for all time, all colored people have promoted tribalism and servitude. There isn't a country on earth today or in the past dominated by colored people who devised the concepts of freedom and individualism that whites did during the era of the British Enlightenment.

In every country on earth occupied by a majority of colored people, if they have anything at all, they have come by it exclusively through white men primarily white men of North Sea Germanic ancestry. The de facto language of commerce, politics and science is the white man's English. All thoughts thought in English are white thoughts and white concepts. The de facto rules of commerce were devised by whites.

It's not coincidence that almost all migration goes from lands of color people with sovereignty to lands of whites with sovereignty.

The basis of an authentic America and thus an authentic cradle-to-grave life for all Americans still ought to be meritocracy — rewards go to those with superior intellects, skills, characters.

If anyone hates that, he or she should hate his parents and his ancestry for their inferior DNA.

Historical realism trumps any fool's charge of white supremacist every time.

Read more ...

Tuesday, February 16, 2016


With the death of Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCUSA) justice Antonin Scalia, politicians and pundits have gone into overtime arguing over the merits and demerits of blocking any Obama nomination. Democrats demand that an Obama nomination should be vetted quickly and confirmed. Republicans demand that Obama must be thwarted and thus leaving it up to the next president.

Forget Scalia. His death is but one vacancy. The real story of the SCUSA is the aged state of three justices — Kennedy, Ginsburg and Breyer.

It's likely that all three either die or become incapacitated over the next eight years. So whoever gets sworn in as president in January, 2017, likely will put three new judges on the SCUSA and thus change the trajectory of law-of-the-land legal rulings for decades to come.

All three aforementioned judges are either nearing or have past life expectancy for the typical American. Kennedy Is 79 and and a half.  Stephen Breyer is 77 and a half. Ginsburg is a decrepit 82 and 11 months.

Removing those judges from thought, right now the court has three republican nominated judges — Clarence Thomas (67), John G. Roberts (61), Samuel A. Alito (65). Two Democrat nominated judges sit on the court — Sonia Sotomayor (61) and Elena Kagan (55).

The Republicans should not be short-sighted here. They should pressure Obama to nominate a left-of-center judge and then confirm that judge, quickly, but after the ruling session, which maybe ends in June.

The next president needs to nominate three Scalia-type judges to replace Kennedy, Breyer and Ginsburg when their days are done. 

Also, it's time to put a Protestant Christian back on the SCUSA. As it is right now, only Roman Catholics and Jews sit on the US Supreme Court — Catholics: Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor; Jews — Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan.

Yet, American jurisprudence has its basis in Protestant Christian morality and thought. It has nothing from Catholic or Judaic thought. 

Read more ...


After the first debate for the 2016 Republican Party nomination, the head of the Republican party badgered front runner Donald Trump to sign a pledge to support the Republican party nominee should Trump lose. Trump did so. And then the party itself began attacking Trump. Trump has declared the deal to be void.

In many ways, a Trump presidential victory as an independent would be much sweeter.  A Trump win as an independent would a crushing blow to party politics in general. This would be dangerous for professional politicians allied with either of the two parties who work in collusion against all others.

It would be a historical first if Trump would win as an independent.

There hasn't be someone who has won an electoral college vote also who was not a Democrat nor a Republican since John Hospers won one vote as a Libertarian in 1972. There hasn't been a candidate not a Dem or GOPher who has won a sizeable number from the electoral college since Theodore Roosevelt won 88 as a Progressive in 1912.

Though the winner of the Republican party nomination twice and twice elected president of the United States, the Republican party establishment reviled Ronald Reagan. They did their best to derail Reagan from winning the nomination as well as the presidency. The establishment hated Reagan.

The ex-Democrat Ronald Reagan was not really a conservative. Reagan so much wanted to be a restorationist president.

Today, Trump is the restorationist candidate. Trump seeks to return the USA back to its wholesome core and away from the failed doctrines of globalization. The candidates are globalization open-borders, H-1B visa internationalists.

Americans who want a restorationist candidate won't care if Trump is the GOP nominee or an independent. Trump is that candidate (see: THE FOUNDERS OF THE USA WERE RADICALS. THEY WERE NEVER CONSERVATIVES NOR TRIBALISTS. YOU MIGHT BE A RESTORATIONIST BUT LIKELY YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE NOR TRIBALIST).

Independents are the largest "party" in the USA! In 2014, 43% of Americans identified politically as independents. Only 26% of Americans self-report as Republicans. The time is now for a National Independence Party.

What have the post-New Deal Republican and Democratic parties given Americans since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of communism?
  • Globalization has been a disaster for working-class Americans.
  • Open-borders illegal immigration of Central Americans and Mexicans has been a disaster for working-class Americans.
  • Excessive legal immigration has been a disaster for working-class Americans.
  • Obamacare and the end of the Gingrich-Clinton welfare reform has been a disaster for Americans.
  • Unneeded wars in the Middle East have been a disaster for Americans.
  • Muslim immigration and Muslim education visas were a disaster to all those on 9/11 who had to leap to their deaths from the World Trade Center.

There have been way too many immigrants from too many countries from when George Herbert Walker Bush took office through Obama.
Immigration law should follow two good, easy rules:
  1. Foreign-born population never should exceed 5% of total population in any year.
  2. No one should gain entry into the USA with an IQ under 105. 
Americans need smarter people not stupider ones. It takes about an 118 IQ to complete a four-year degree in the sciences at an accredited university.

The globalization agenda pursued by post-Reagan Bushian Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats — so-called neo-liberalism — has everything to do with the rise of Trump and perhaps the now forming National Independence Party. 

In my years, I have found almost all to be budding, teeny tyrants in the making. To them, it's always all right to steal property from others who are better off than they are to fund their personal Utopia schemes, e.g., save the whales, save the blacks, save the this. And property has always only meant the right of ownership in things. Too many don't know the first thing about jurisprudence. So they don't know that property doesn't mean chattel possessed, e.g., a house. For landlords have property in rentals but never have possession of those rentals, renters do.

So this is why all should see reality for what it is — most of mankind live in the throes of evil by choice. They are greedy and slothful. They seek only to join forces with enough others to force the weak or the solitary types to fork over parts of their honest dealings. It's enslavement by other means.

The righteous man or woman believes in a few things: Society is more important than government; government should only exist to protect individuals as individuals and never groups; there should be no specific welfare or subsidy of any kind.

All other belief is error and reveals corruption as well as malformed character.

Soon I will present what the platform and agenda of a National Independence Party might look like. Until then:

Read more ...

Monday, February 15, 2016


The first presidential election featuring at least two parties happened in 1792. George Washington, the winner of that election, returned Washington to the presidency not as a member of a political party. The losers were political party members, John Adams of the Federalist party and George Clinton of the original Republican party (wrongly called the Democratic-Republican Party today by historians).

U.S. Presidents from 1789 to 1901

After Washington, the Federalist Party gave us John Adams. The original Republicans gave us Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe and John Quincy Adams.

The original Republican party of Jeffersonian democracy best exemplifies what many Americans would like to have today — republicanism. Among the Jeffersonian democracy core ideals are these:

  • The Bill of Rights is supreme — The federal government must not violate the rights of individuals.
  • The federal government must not violate the rights of the states.
  • Freedom of speech and the press are the best methods to prevent tyranny.
  • Separation of church and state
  • All men had the right to be informed, and thus, to have a say in the government.
  • The judiciary should be subservient to the elected branches.

Along the way, other political parties came and went. These parties produced national candidates for the presidency but with the exception of the Whig Party, never won: the National Republicans (not to be confused with today's Republican Party), the Nullifer Party, the Anti-Masonic Party, the Whig Party, the Liberty Party, the Free Soil Party, the American Party (aka "Know Nothing"), the Constitutional Union Party, the Liberal Republican Party, the Greenback Party, the Prohibition Party, the Union Labor Party, the Populist Party, the Socialist Party, the Progressive Party of 1912, the Progressive Party of 1924, the Union Party, the States' Rights Democrat Party ("Dixiecrats"), the Progressive Party of 1948, the American Labor Party, the American Independent Party. A few lesser parties still exist: the Libertarian Party, the Reform Party and the Green Party.

The original Democratic Party came into being in 1828. The original Democratic Party  advocated individual liberalism, the good kind of liberalism — the supremacy of freedom rather than regulation combined with representative democracy. The original Democratic Party of 1828 attempted to express British Enlightenment ideals.

Today, the Democratic Party advocates what they call social liberalism. What they support is merely socialism — the supremacy of law rather than freedom combined with universal voting rather than representative democracy, the supremacy of the community over the individual, wealth redistribution to equalize incomes regardless of effort, along with regulatory intervention to game outcomes.

I would have been a Democratic Party supporter had I lived in 1828. Never could I be a supporter of the post-16th Amendment Democratic Party. Their beliefs are unscientific and their agendas unenlightened.

The original Democratic Party gave us these: Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, James Polk, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson and Grover Cleveland.

Continuously operating party since 1854, there have been three versions of the anti-slavery Republican Party — the original anti-slavery radical version, the post-reconstruction version and the post-New Deal contemporary Republican version.

The anti-slavery Republican Party gave us these: Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes.  The post-reconstruction Republican party gave us these: James Garfield, Benjamin Harrison, William McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover.

U.S. Presidents from 1901 to 2016

Today's post-16th Amendment Democratic Party has given us these: Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama. Today's post-New Deal Republican party has given us these: Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush.

On the whole Republicans have produced bad presidents. Some of the worst presidents have been Republicans — Lincoln, Grant, Nixon, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush. Teddy Roosevelt and Eisenhower were so-so Republican presidents. Harrison, Taft, and Ford were mediocre at best. Hayes and Harding were bad. Garfield died in office too quickly to know if they would have been good or bad.

Before Reagan, the only great Republican president was Calvin Coolidge. The only other good Republican presidents were Chester Arthur and William McKinley. It should be noted that Arthur was not elected.

The post-New Deal Republicans mostly have been loser presidents.

  • Nixon — closed the gold window pulling Americans off gold for international balance of payments; price controls; Watergate; saddled Americans with the EPA.
  • Bush 1 — worked for the Saudis to oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait; we read his lips and then he raised taxes; started the Kinder Gentler NWO USA; accelerated immigration; established the globalization doctrine for Republicans.
  • Bush 2 — idiot wars against Afghanistan and Iraq; let the Saudi Arabians murder 3,000 Americans and didn't attack the Saudis; nodded approval over the residential realty bubble; Bush's Iraq War led to a post-war civil war among vying tribes and the rise of ISIS; failed to support a sovereign Kurdistan in the aftermath of his stupidity; did little to stem the flow of illegals which came to build realty bubble houses many of which still remain empty; infamously said, "I've abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system," to justify bailing out bankrupt General Motors and bankrupt Chrysler; saddled Americans with the Department of Homeland Security

As well, all of the social liberal Democrats have been among the worst presidents.

  • Woodrow Wilson — lied about keeping Americans out of World War (1), signed the Federal Reserve bill into law.
  • Franklin Roosevelt — wickedly used welfare as a carrot to get votes; stuck Americans with a raw deal called the New Deal; lengthened a depression into a Great Depression; and sided with the Soviets over eastern Europe.
  • Harry Truman — needlessly killed Japanese civilians with two atomic. bombs. He could have dropped those bombs away from civilians to prove a point.
  • John Kennedy — almost had us all blown up in a nuclear war; started the shameful Vietnam War.
  • Lyndon Johnson — escalated the shameful Vietnam War; stuck us with the Civil Rights Act and crappy Hart-Celler Act (pro-third world immigration law).
  • Jimmy Carter — sold off the Panama Canal; failed to back the Shah, which led to a theocracy in Iran that fuels global terrorism; saddled Americans with the Department of Education, Department of Energy
  • Obama — is a strong candidate for the worst president ever; stuck Americans with Obamacare; ISIS; works as Mohammadan apologist; presided over an economic depression lasting his entire presidency

Here is my take on the presidents.

  • Best: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson
  • Better: Andrew Jackson, James K. Polk, Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, Calvin Coolidge, Ronald Reagan
  • Good: Chester A. Arthur
  • OK: John Tyler, Andrew Johnson, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Bill Clinton
  • Lame: John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, Rutherford B. Hayes, William Howard Taft, Gerald Ford
  • Bad: James Monroe, James Buchanan, Ulysses S. Grant, Warren G. Harding, Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter
  • Worst: James Madison, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, Barack Obama
  • No opinion: William Henry Harrison, James A. Garfield

Read more ...