Thursday, February 11, 2016

IS NATIVE-BORN MARCO RUBIO A NATURAL-BORN AMERICAN OR IS RUBIO ANOTHER CANDIDATE INELIGIBLE TO SWEAR THE PRESIDENCY OATH LIKE NATURAL-BORN CANADIAN TED CRUZ?


Back in January, I shared with you NATURAL-BORN U.S. CITIZENS. READ SNIPPETS FROM RECOGNIZED AMERICAN WORKS ON THE TOPIC INCLUDING CITED CASES.

As well, I have shared with you all of the legal reasons why the natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz is ineligible to become president of the United States of America in these:

✓ TAKE OFF, EH. IS TED CRUZ IS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN? PUNDIT LAWYERS GET THIS SO WRONG, THE HOSERS.

✓ TED CRUZ COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HIGHEST SERVICE TO HER MAJESTY, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, IN CANADA. SO HOW CAN TED BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA?

✓ THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

✓ WAS TED CRUZ A U.S. CITIZEN AT BIRTH? THE MCCARRAN-WALTER ACT (THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT OF 1952) WHICH THE RULED OVER HIM SAYS MAYBE, BUT IT ALSO COULD HAVE STRIPPED HIM OF CITIZENSHIP



Marco Rubio is a native-born U.S. citizen. That is not in question. Yet, being native-born does not equate with being natural-born.

All courts would recognize Rubio as a native-born under the 14th Amendment as well as under Congress' naturalizing law, 8 U.S. CODE § 1401. However, the purpose of the the 14th Amendment was to impose upon the states prohibition of passing laws that could strip ex-slave Americans of the full and equal protection of any law. The 14th Amendment fails to make anyone natural-born.

For more on the 14th see below. For more on 8 U.S. CODE § 1401, check out: THE 8 U.S. CODE § 1401 DEFENSE OF TED CRUZ FAILS TO SUPPORT CRUZ' NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP, BUT DOES MAKE HIM A CITIZEN.

A key concept of being natural-born is natural allegiance. Natural allegiance arises from jurisdiction and citizenship of parents.

A.O. Wright wrote, "A child born of American parents in any place under American [Congress] jurisdiction is unquestionably a natural-born American citizen." And when you think about it even without being a lawyer, this should seem right. If your parents are U.S. citizens and you're born in any of the 50 states or if you were born in any of the organized, incorporated territories of the United States, you're natural born.

Today, the USA lacks organized, incorporated territories. The last two became the states of Hawaii and Alaska.

When Marco Rubio was born, both of his parents were natural-born Cubans and citizens of Cuba residing within Florida, clearly a state of the United States of America. Marco Rubio's parents had natural allegiance to Cuba. They could have worked as spies for the Communist Castro Cuban government. They could have been sent to produce a Manchurian candidate.

As Rubio's parents lacked natural allegiance to Congress and as their natural-born son, that is, not adopted son, it's quite likely that Rubio also lacked natural allegiance to Congress in spite of being born under the jurisdiction of Congress.

Thus, it's quite likely that Marco Rubio is not a natural-born American and therefore, like natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio cannot swear the oath of office for the presidency of the USA.

It is the lack of citizenship of his parents that calls into jeopardy Marco Rubio's eligibility to run for the presidency.

And though many would like this to mean the entire Obama presidency has been illegal, it's not likely as Obama's mamma was a natural-born U.S. citizen.

Here is an interesting video from a woman who bills herself as Publius Hudlah. Hudlah publishes her work at Publius-Huldah's Blog


Natural Born Citizen Explained! from Publius Huldah on Vimeo.

Section 1 of the the Fourteenth Amendment states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall any State deprive any person of life liberty or property without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

In The Constitution of the United States: Notes of the Decisions of the Supreme Court Thereon from the Organization of the Court till October, 1900  Edwin Eustace Bryant wrote:





In Our Constitution: Why and How it Was Made - Who Made It, and What It Is, Edward Waterman Townsend wrote:


Read more ...
Blogger Tricks

WHY EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION POLL FOR 2016 YOU SHALL SEE OR HEAR WILL BE WRONG

Every poll that you will see and hear reported by television broadcasters, hear reported by radio broadcasters, or read published by newspapers and websites regarding the upcoming presidential race will be fabricated and not scientific. Every survey will be flawed and unscientific. Thus no results they claim can get projected to the universe of voters.



Pollsters use a totally wrong, unscientific method. Typically, they survey between 700 and 1,000 people chosen randomly. Let's say these 1,000 people get chosen by equal distribution, that is, 20 in each state.

No one can project the results from a mere 20 persons to the universe of voters in any state. Thus, the number of surveys completed would be too small. Every statistician worth his salt should know this truth.

However, there is a far more damning reason why you should denounce all polls being foisted upon you. Because of the electoral college, the presidential election is fifty seven (57) separate elections and requires 57 surveys for full coverage to predict the full results. An accurate poll must account for the electoral college since presidential election doesn't get decided by the popular vote.

There is one election in each of 48 states that have winner-take-all elections for the electoral college electors. Two states, Maine and Nebraska, lack winner-take-all elections. Those states combine for nine elections.

According to The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration

The founding fathers established [the Electoral College] in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. 
The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. Your state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators.  
Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. For this reason, in the following discussion, the word “state” also refers to the District of Columbia.

If a pollster did not need to account for the electoral college, to get a margin of error ± 4% would require 784 completed surveys at the 95% confidence level. Yet, because a presidential election is 57 separate elections and not one, proper polling requires 57 polls, each with 784 completed questionnaires for a margin of error of ±4%. That's 48 polls for the all-or-nothing states and nine polls for each electoral district of Maine and Nebraska.

For results that have a margin of error ±4% at the 95% confidence anyone surveying would need to complete 44,688 surveys and all on the same day! Otherwise, you don't have a scientifically conducted poll with results that can get projected to the universe of voters.

The math: 784 surveys × 57 = 44,688

The United States Election Assistance Commission, which Congress established by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) as an independent, bipartisan commission, serves as a national clearinghouse of information on election administration and produces the  foremost data collection effort related to voter registration, election administration, and the ways in which Americans cast their ballots.


The EAC defines two concepts:

  1. Voting Age Population (VAP): People who are 18 years of age or older, regardless of whether they are eligible to register to vote. 
  2. Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP): Persons  who are citizens and of voting age (18 years or older). These numbers are estimates generated by the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey.

We only care about the CVAP numbers. With the CVAP numbers, for each state, we can adjust the number of needed completed questionnaires to the count of legal voters in each state and still maintain our targeted margin of error with confidence. As it turns out, we can cut down the number of completed questionnaires to 600 for each state, except Wyoming, which we can cut down by one less to 599.

Here is what the completed questionnaire counts should look like:





Also, if some of the survey respondents complete a questionnaire before a candidate said something controversial, say freeze all immigration from countries with Mohammadans, while other survey respondents complete\ the same questionnaire afterward, the results cannot be used since the opinions are collected on different facts. Time-sensitive surveys like voting surveys must be done on the same day for all respondents to be accurate.

Now, during the 2012 presidential election campaign, a pollster would have needed to complete 9,000 questionnaires all on the same day to predict Obama the winner.



Nearly all presidential election polls have completed survey counts of 500 to 1,000. Thus, the results from such polls cannot be projected to the universe of likely voters, hence such pollsters report wrong results. In short, do not believe any of those polls.

Also, every time another variable gets added, doubling of completed surveys must happen. So if a legit pollster wants to know how Latina females plan to vote, such a pollster would need to complete a whopping 89,376 surveys on the same day within a tight news window!

Every poll ever reported on television and every poll ever printed in a newspaper regarding presidential races have been fabricated. Such polls were never scientific. Until polls adopt the scientific method of polling, all future presidential polls will be wrong.

Disclosure: I used to work as the director of public opinion polling and marketing research for a Dow Jones owned newspaper. My grad work at S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications included public opinion polling.
Read more ...

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

IT'S THE DELEGATES, STUPID. HOW MUCH ARE CANDIDATES SPENDING TO WIN DELEGATES FOR THE 2016 PRESIDENCY?




Delegates nominate. Primaries and caucuses exist to secure delegates for the nomination.

According to The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process by the Council on Foreign Relations:

In 2016, a Democratic candidate must secure at least 2,382 out of 4,763 delegates to become the party’s nominee. The number of delegates allocated to each state takes into account the state’s Democratic vote in the previous three presidential elections and its assigned number of Electoral College votes.
Meanwhile, a Republican candidate must secure at least 1,237 out of 2,472 delegates to win the party’s nomination. The Republican Party allocates each state ten delegates, plus three for each congressional district, and bonus delegates for states that contributed electoral votes to the party in the previous presidential election, as well those that elected Republicans to high offices.

Right now, at his pace, Jeb Bush would need to spend $21.03 billion to secure the nomination.  Marco Rubio would need to spend $4.771 billion to capture the GOPher party nomination. John Kasich would need to spend $4.36 billion.

Jeb, Rubio, Kasich — they are not viable considering the national election might need another billion or two in spending.

Meanwhile, self-funded billionaire businessman Donald Trump would only need to spend $509 million to win the Republican nomination from restorationist voters.

Jeb Bush was the Republican Party establishment's anointed candidate. Bush would need to spend 97% more than Trump. Said another way, for every one dollar Jeb Bush would need to spend to capture the nomination, Donald Trump would need to spend only two pennies.

It's the price per delegate and securing the most delegates that counts.

Read more ...

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

TRUMP HAS "YUGE" WIN. TRUMP AFFECTS THE OUTCOME FOR HILLARY AS SHE FEELS TRUMP'S "BERN." TRUMP IS THE MOST INTERESTING MAN IN POLITICS.

Two candidates stood tall among their competitors in their respective parties. Donald Trump smashed his Republican Party establishment rivals capturing more than twice as many votes as the runner up John Kasich and more than three times as many votes as other Republican Party establishment candidates — Cruz, Jeb Bush, Rubio.




For the Democrats, for every 100 voters for Hillary Clinton, there were 154 for Bernie Sanders. So how did Bernie win?



First, all should notice that as a senator from Vermont, Sanders could be considered a favored-son candidate in next door New Hampshire. Yet, here are the reasons:


  1. The Democratic Party continues to shift further left.
  2. As even more of a leftist, Bernie Sanders is the heir apparent to Obama.
  3. Three movements have pushed the Democratic Party left — Occupy Wall Street, Obamacare, #blackslivesmatter (see:  Have Democrats Pulled Too Far Left? Peter Wehner, New York Times, May 27, 2015)
  4. Hillary is a Blue Dog (near-center) as her husband was. 
  5. Skilled white Americans who aren't college grads and who come from traditional Democrat families will be voting for Trump if they vote.


#BlackLivesMatter has put white Democrats under scrutiny. Because Hillary is in the race to become the first woman president along with the sex scandals of her husband as well as her own scandals, Hillary is failing under that scrutiny (see: STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?)

Bernie is the guy who wants to give it all to the down-trodden — no-job blacks, fast-food Hispanics, no-hubby young mommies — and take all from rich white folks who are only rich because of white privilege.

In short, Bernie won the young new Democrat vote while the blue-collar white traditional household Democrats either stayed home in protest against Hillary or because they plan to vote for Trump in the general election.

As I wrote back in late November, NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH, Trump is that extraordinary white guy.

Back on November 14, 2014, in Why Democrats Can’t Win Over White Working-Class Voters, Jamelle Bouie of Slate (disclosure: I don't read Slate. I found the work by googling), wrote that white working-class Americans without college degrees no longer want anything to do with the Democratic Party. 

Bouie stated, "Democrats don’t have to win this group as much as they have to avoid a rout." Hillary is the kind of Democrat who needs that group but they're going for Trump. 

In the absence of white, no-college, skilled working-class voters, the remaining Democrats who show up to the polls are the leftists. So it should surprise no one, the leftists voted for Bernie.

It should be clear. Trump is having a huge effect on both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Trump might be more responsible for Bernie Sander's success than Sanders himself.

Donald Trump slaughtered the establishment Republican Party candidates today. Trump did so without wasted effort. Trump visited New Hampshire a small number but the right number of times. Trump focused his campaigning in a narrow geographic corridor near the Massachusetts border and along the coast.





John Kasich the Ohio governor who always talks about his post office working dad spent big to win a distant second. Some reports say Kasich spent as much as $14 million. Kasich also visited tiny New Hampshire 100 times or so.

Kasich put his marbles in winning New Hampshire because his strategy is to avoid the south and focus on the Northeast and the Great Lakes. 

Natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz squeaked passed Jeb Bush for third. Cruz barely won last week in the burnt-over state, Iowa. And Cruz needed shenanigans to swipe Ben Carson's support. 

Likely, Cruz picked up voters from race dropout Rand Paul. New Hampshire swings libertarian as it is known as the home of the Free State Project.

Cruz continues to face questions about his likely illegal campaign. For more on that see:


Most Americans are neither conservatives nor socialists. Many Americans don't vote. 

Most Americans are hopeful restorationists. Like most good Americans, Trump is a restorationist. Trump set the restorationist agenda — Make America Great Again.

Trump is the candidate disparate voters have sought for a long time. To Tea Party people, Trump is the Tea Party candidate. For Pat Buchanan types, Trump is the Buchanan candidate. For Ross Perot types, Trump is the Perot candidate.

Trump is the Restorationist candidate who can capture power from the establishment Republican Party. 

For more on the rise of the restorationists, check out my key works:








Read more ...

Monday, February 8, 2016

THE FOUNDERS OF THE USA WERE RADICALS. THEY WERE NEVER CONSERVATIVES NOR TRIBALISTS. YOU MIGHT BE A RESTORATIONIST BUT LIKELY YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE NOR TRIBALIST.

The founders were radicals. They weren't conservatives. 

The founders overthrew the conservatives — the King and the British loyalists. They established a radical, new form of governance, one based on republicanism and a union of sovereign states, a kind of government never tried anywhere by any people before.



The aim of radicalism is to destroy. The aim of conservatism is to preserve. The aim of true liberalism is to improve.

Progress means going from tribalism to individualism. It is the move away from communism in women and property to individual ownership of self, in things and in agreement with other individuals, from feudal arrangements to individuals voluntarily organizing around the trade of property in pursuit of profit.

Most Americans are free-capitalism progressives. They support the general political movement that has been ongoing since the British Enlightenment of the supremacy of the individual over the group.

The support buying and selling of goods and their own labor. Thus, they support markets. They support earning wages and thus they support how they get wages, the profitable efficiency achieved from capital. They support profits and the profit principle (see: CAPITALISM. BECAUSE WITHOUT IT, YOU WOULD BE LIVING AS A BARE SUBSISTENCE SAVAGE).

They support the right to start your own business and compete fairly without the help of government. And they support the primacy of the individual through ardent defense of the individual and his property (see: COMMERCIAL REALITY. A CRASH-COURSE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW IT ALL WORKS and THE THEORY OF TRADING PROPERTY FOR PROFIT).

That is what being a progressive truly means. Real progressives champion the individual and his property. Being progressive does not mean being hip or being a libertine.

And most Americans are restorationists. They want to revert to full adherence to the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution. Today's Americans are restorationists who want to enforce the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution in pursuit of limited politicians, enforced competition, self-rule and entrepreneuralism.

Restorationists are not conservatives. No authentic Bill of Rights American who believes in free-enterprise and the Protestant work ethic ever should want to help the Conservatives.

True conservatism means to maintain power typically derived from land ownership or monopoly or oligopoly franchise owing to laws and regulations. Conservatives seek to prevent change for themselves by discouraging every bit of competition.

Conservatives oppose true competition and defense of the individual and his property. Conservatives who tend to be the super-rich of the establishment seek to use laws and regulation to form oligopoly in markets and keep down the Middle Class (see: KILLING THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THE "WE WANT YOU TO BELIEVE CAPITAL GAINS INCOME IS DIFFERENT" TRICK).Conservatives are the champions of crony politics (see: IT'S ALWAYS CRONY POLITICS, CRONY GOVERNANCE AND CRONY REGULATORY CAPTURE and TRY CRONY POLITICS, CRONY GOVERNANCE AND CRONY REGULATORY CAPTURE BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CRONY CAPITALISM.)


The propagandists of the Republican Party have been lying to Americans for decades. They have used hot button issues — gay marriage, abortion — to gain support of good Americans and in so doing, gain the political power needed to push a globalization internationalist agenda that runs opposed to the shop keepers, mechanics, subcontractors and restaurateurs of the USA, you know, middle-class, small-businessmen. Republicans have tricked Americans into getting their votes by saying they would argue against abortion and gay marriage. 

Notice, they never said they would stop these things. And they have not. Merely they have said they would argue against such things. 

Conservatives whether Blue Dog Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans have been defending open-borders internationalism globalization for 40 years and massive immigration for over 50 years. The internationalism agenda of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of supporting massive immigration has been killing working-class Americans.

Conservatives fight to keep the existing state of affairs. The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution and the ongoing push for globalization. Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going. 

Voting for conservatives rather than nationalists for the middle class is personal economic suicide for most Americans (see: AMERICANS ARE COMMITTING (ECONOMIC) SUICIDE DAILY WITH IPHONES AND IPADS).

Rockefeller Republicans and Bushian Republicans are True Conservatives. They stand opposed the American Middle Class and the Bill of Rights.

George Herbert Walker Bush and the GOP Establishment stopped The Reagan Revolution after Reagan's departure from the White House. GHW Bush was a Trojan Horse in the Reagan White House. GHW Bush turned control of the GOP back to the eastern establishment, center-left internationalists.

We have had 27 years of Bushism globalization and internationalism in the USA and that ideological stance has brought the USA to near ruins.

Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going.  Forty-seven Republican conservatives voted yea for TPP/Fast track.  Many on the pro-TPP list also support illegal alien amnesty on the path to citizenship. They need to be voted out of office and replaced with Nationalists. 

Lisa Murkowski (AK), Dan Sullivan (AK), Jeff Flake (AZ), John McCain (AZ), John Boozman (AR), Tom Cotton (AR), Cory Gardner (CO), Marco Rubio (FL), John Isakson (GA), David Perdue (GA), Michael Crapo (ID), James Risch (ID), Mark Kirk (IL), Daniel Coats (IN), Joni Ernst (IA), Chuck Grassley (IA), Jerry Moran (KS), Pat Roberts (KS),  Mitch McConnell (KY), Bill Cassidy (LA), David Vitter (LA), Thad Cochran (MS), Roger Wicker (MS), Roy Blunt (MO), Steve Daines (MT), Deb Fischer (NE), Benjamin Sasse (NE), Dean Heller (NV), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Richard Burr (NC), Thom Tillis (NC), John Hoeven (ND), Rob Portman (OH), Jim Inhofe (OK), James Lankford (OK), Pat Toomey (PA), Lindsey Graham (SC), Tim Scott (SC), Mike Rounds (SD), John Thune (SD), Lamar Alexander (TN), John Cornyn (TX), Orrin Hatch (UT), Shelley Capito (WV), Ron Johnson (WI), John Barrasso (WY)

Here are the few Republican heroes who voted nay against TPP / Fast-track:

Jeff Sessions (AL), Richard Shelby (AL), Rand Paul (KY), Susan Collins (ME)

It's too bad that the natural-born Canadian immigrant Ted Cruz seems like a constitutionalist except when it becomes inconvenient. Cruz is running for the Republican Party nomination for the presidency, but is ineligible as he was naturalized eight years after his birth. For more, see:


What does it tell you when the majority of Democrats voted to deny their own man Obama TPP/ Fast Track?

John McCain claims to be a conservative. Marco Rubio does. They voted for TPP/Fast Track. These people support amnesty for illegals. 

Paul Ryan claims to be a conservative. Ryan gave Obama the farm to fund sanctuary cities and importation of Mohammadan immigrants from Syria.

Rupert Murdoch claims to be a conservative and he funds major open-border initiatives.

Look at all of the horrible conservative rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCUSA):
  • Kelo v. New London 
  • National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius 
  • American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc
  • King v. Burwell

Three of five SCUSA robes who ruled in the affirmative in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), were GOPher Party nominees — Justices John Paul Stevens (Ford appointee), Anthony Kennedy (Reagan appointee), David Souter (GHW Bush appointee), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton appointee) and Stephen Breyer (Clinton appointee). And Clinton was a Blue Dog (conservative) Democrat, in practicality, a Rockefeller Republican.

Kelo v New London lets big businessmen swipe property in land from small owners under the guise of improving municipal tax receipts.

Look at all of the horrible conservative reciprocal trade agreements with non-industrial countries, which only leads to the destruction of our own industry owing to wage differentials:

  • Colombia
  • Panama
  • Mexico
  • Chile
  • Peru
  • Morocco
  • Jordan
  • Costa Rica
  • El Salvador
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Nicaragua
  • Dominican Republic
The Republican Party means center-left globalization party. They have not hid this fact since Goldwater lost to LBJ. They helped to pass LBJ's Great Society legislation. They helped to pass immigration reform in 1965, the law which has given us our current state of horrible affairs of too many immigrants.

Being tricked into getting your vote by claims of arguing against abortion and gay marriage doesn't make you a conservative. Unless you are get a paycheck from party headquarters, get an appointment to office or get laws passed to protect your business, you're not in the party. Merely you have been suckered into being a fan, a subscriber, like those fools with the Sierra Club and Greenpeace.

The Republican Party always have been internationalists. Here is point 14 from their party platform going all the way back to 1860, that is, before the Civil War:

That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.
Now, there will be some who will get triggered by cognitive dissonance and want to argue for themselves as conservatives. They will err with the fallacy of appeal to authority by citing a dictionary definition. 

A dictionary is mere collection of usages whether those usages are right or wrong. Ask any dictionary editor.  As well, various dictionaries get written for estimated reading levels. 

American Thinker's own Selwyn Duke would agree with me. See what he had to say on the subject in Is Trump the First ‘European-conservative’ American Presidential Candidate?:

A prerequisite for grasping this is first understanding the true natures of liberalism and conservatism...While many have their own definitions of the latter -- and will stubbornly insist they’re correct -- the truth is that both political terms are provisional, meaning different things in different times and places. The term “conservative” in the 1970s referred to a communist in the USSR and someone staunchly anti-communist in the US... Liberalism is the process of inexorably trying to change the status quo; conservatism is the process of trying to preserve the status quo. Thus, what the terms represent will vary depending on the status quo in question."
The Russian communists fighting against the fall of the Soviet Union were conservatives. Yet, when Russian communists originally overthrew Czar Nicholas II, they were radicals.

The word conservative entered English from the Middle French conservatif in the late 1300s. The use of the word in politics traces to French disciples of Edmund Burke's opposition to the French Revolution and his call for clerical and political restoration in 1790. They called him "Le Conservateur."

By 1830 or so in Britain, conservative replaced the pejorative Tory as Tory was the name of a British political party first composed of Yorkist Tories of 1680. Tories were Irish Catholics who were dispossessed of their land and hence the label Tory, which means outlaw.

When the Democrats who controlled the 63rd United States Congress and the presidency in Woodrow Wilson established the Federal Reserve, they were radicals. Today, those who defend the Federal Reserve monetary system of 100% bank credit are conservatives. 

The Republican Party started out as radicals. They overthrew the slavery system of the South and caused a civil war over it. They were radicals when they overthrew the monetary system based on money and went with one based on greenbacks.

The Republican Party have ended up as conservatives. They are trying to preserve their 40 years of globalization and internationalism.

Free-capitalist progressive restorationists are those who believe in a limited role for government and a strict adherence to the constitution. Conservatives do not believe in these things.

The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution. Obama is a radical. Bernie Sanders is a radical.

Bernie and Obama are tribalists. Marxist / Socialists are tribalists. Tribalism is not a kind of liberalism nor a kind of progressivism. To better understand Obama, check out BEATING THE DRUMS FOR OBAMA TRIBALISM.

Hillary Clinton is a conservative. She wants to preserve the status quo of the globalists as her husband was a globalist. Ted Cruz is a conservative. So too are Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich.

Either way, whether with Obama and Bernie, or Hillary, Cruz, Rubio, Bush, Christie, or Kasich, any of those people will wreck the USA. Open-borders and international ruling boards that aren't elected by Americans will kill the USA.

To better understand what is happening, check out these:

✓ ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?
✓ NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH.

We can have free trade deals with the Canadians, with the Australians and with the Kiwis, but we should never have free trade deals with low capital countries (see: SOPHIE'S CHOICE OF CAPITAL OR LABOR. A FREE-MARKETS LIBERTARIAN BECOMES AN ANTI-CAPITALIST AND PERPETUATES AN ECONOMICS MYTH). 

Americans must demand Congress to rescind all of the trade deals with countries not close to our own in terms of industrial development as measured by GDP per capita. In fact, tariffs should be levied high against such local capital countries. Free trade deals with countries like China and Mexico kill the return on capital in the USA and thus kill high-paying jobs in the USA. All wages come from capital. 

The big firms hate domestic competition. They love these trade deals with Third World countries. It kills domestic competitors.

To see the right tariff formula: WHY TRUMP IS WINNING. THE REST ARE INTERNATIONALIST SELLOUTS WHO STAND AGAINST WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS.


You must read these works. You must read all of my works on Bizarro Theater. 

And for a general history of the Conservative Coalition, Wikipedia offers a write-up.
Read more ...

Friday, February 5, 2016

2016 FEB JOBS REPORT FOR JAN 2016 SHOWS A RISE IN TRUE UNEMPLOYMENT


Today, the True Dollar Journal reveals an uptick in the Jobless Rate in spite of the propaganda coming out of Obama's Department of Labor.

For more: THE 2016 FEBRUARY EMPLOYMENT SITUATION REPORT FOR JANUARY 2016 SHOWS A RISE IN THE TRUE JOBLESS RATE.

See the charts!


Read more ...

Thursday, February 4, 2016

WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS AND THE FORTHCOMING NATIONAL PARTY OF FREE-CAPITALISM PROGRESSIVES. THE GLOBALIZATION PARTY TIME OF INTERNATIONALISTS COULD BE COMING TO AN END IN THE USA.

Yesterday, the Gallup Organization published results of a major study — Red States Outnumber Blue for First Time in Gallup Tracking.
According to Gallup,

20 states are solidly Republican or leaning Republican, compared with 14 solidly Democratic or leaning Democratic states. The remaining 16 are competitive. This is the first time in Gallup's eight years of tracking partisanship by state that there have been more Republican than Democratic states.  It also marks a dramatic shift from 2008, when Democratic strength nationally was its greatest in recent decades.

Here is is what the USA looks like right now:


But what would the USA look like if a nationalist party were to rise up? What if all of the competitive states went nationalist?

The Republican Party would fade away into obscurity and the Democratic Party would be marginalized.




For far too long there has been a status quo — balance of power among contending sub-factions each inspired by the fiction of its own importance by-self idealization and desire to rule. It has been an unstable equilibrium held in place by the dominant faction — the globalization internationalists of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

And while there has been quarreling within this faction, they have shared a key agenda — globalization for their billionaire donors. And so, to win their agenda, they have tricked the rank-and-file voters of both parties.

For Democrat voters, they have preached a message of Hispanic immigration is a right and reconquista. For Republican voters, they have preached a message of family values and Wal-mart free trade.

These master manipulators through propaganda have tricked voters into believing they are part of the upper set as if they were among the decision makers of the the parties themselves. These master manipulators have trained voters like dogs through repeating catchwords and grand themes. And they have scared all as being labeled heretics if they stand against their respective party.

A general revolution is not made in a day. A revolution happens when the dominant faction begins to weaken.

The globalization faction is losing their grip because of the collapse of the economy. I have shown you in pictures the real economy has been in decline ever year Obama has been in office. There has been no recovery, only inflated prices owing to more dollars in circulation.


The decline is real. I have shown in pictures that you don't have any representative in Congress, at all.

✓ THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE.

Politicians have lied to you everyday of your lives. I have shown you in pictures the truth about their big lies.

✓ THE BIG LIE: AMERICANS ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

There is a big shake-up in American politics underway.

✓ ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?

Working-class Americans are awakening to the idea of their own party — a nationalist party, a party not built on socialism like Obama and Bernie Sanders want for Americans, but a party built on American industry, American ingenuity, American competitiveness and American spirit.

✓ WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS STAND WITH TRUMP. RELENTLESS ATTACKS ON TRUMP FAIL TO DERAIL THEM.

Globalization has failed Americans and they know it. Because the Democratic Party continues to shift left toward full-blown socialism, core, blue-collar, working-class Democrats are leaving them.  They are not conservatives in the making however.

A rising middle class always have been the true threat to Conservatives. That is why conservatives focus on killing the middle-class. 

Conservatives whether Blue Dog Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans have been pushing open-borders internationalism (globalism) for 40 years. The internationalism agenda of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of supporting massive immigration has been killing working-class Americans.

True conservatism means maintaining the power by land and commerce monopolists and oligopolists. It has nothing to do with being a prude, being against gay marriage, couples living together out of wedlock and so forth.

You can recognize true conservatism by these features: hierarchy, authority and a singular moral order. Conservatives seek to prevent change for themselves by discouraging every bit of competition.




Most Americans are free-capitalism progressives. They happen not to know this about themselves, however. By free-capitalism, I mean free-markets, free-enterprise, productive efficiency under technological advance. By progressive, I mean the primacy of the individual through ardent defense of the individual and his property.

Free-capitalism progressives with a Nationalist Party focused on Bill of Rights Liberty (see: CASHING IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY) is the USA most Americans want. Our USA is an honest one:

  • Enforced competition 
  • Regulated politicians
  • Self rule
  • Entrepreneurialism 
It has become all too clear for most Americans. The USA is on the decline. The decline has come strictly from politics, politicians and rigging the system through law.  

Lawgivers have interfered in the lives of Americans consistently. They do so through taxation, regulation and redistribution through welfare and subsidy. 

They can because Americans have lost control of the government itself. Today, no one in the USA has popular representation. Today, Americans live under American-style totalitarianism — regulators and bureaucrats involved in every aspect of our lives.

The real purpose of government should be to enhance property and not impair it through taxation and regulation. The real and only social contract is fulfilling duty in contract of property and in so doing, contributing to the harmony of all.

Americans are living in dystopia of perpetual war — foreign wars and civil wars. All war is about property. People fight to dispossess each other of their property.

True progress is about individualism. Individualism is about property and contract, relationships and honest. True individualism is about justice. 

True retrogression is about tribalism. Tribalism is about shackles, slavery, force, dispossession, rhetoric, deceit and trickery.










Read more ...

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS THE MOST DANGEROUS HATE GROUP IN THE USA TODAY. KEEP YOUR DAUGHTERS AWAY FROM THEM.

The venal Southern Poverty Law Center is the most hate-filled group in the USA. That should be clear to all. The jerks at the Southern Poverty Law Center spend their waking days deciding upon whom they can hate next.


Who anointed the jerks at the Southern Poverty Law Center to decide who comprise a hate group and who do not?

Why haven't all demanded the Southern Poverty Law Center to categorize all political groups in the USA by consistent manifest metrics so that all can judge whether or not the jerks at the Southern Poverty Law Center have assessed with accuracy.

The people of the Southern Poverty Law Center lack any legitimacy whatsoever. They are not elected.

Instead, the people of the Southern Poverty Law Center wage jihad against anyone they do not like, any laws they do not want to follow and any cultural traditions of authentic Americans that stand in the way of their quest for dominance and supremacy.

In a twist, the Southern Poverty Law Center adapted Everett Dean Martin's work Behavior of Crowds, for their 1920 pamphlet, The Mob Mind vs Civil Liberty. Martin was the Director of the Cooper Union Forum of the People's Institute New York City

In his work, Martin described factions known as struggle groups. The Southern Poverty Law Center has become a struggle group. 

Here is what Martin had to say on struggle groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center:




The chief tactic of those in control of the Southern Poverty Law Center is to wage a public relations war against those they seek to take down. Hence, they label their victims as hate groups. Labeling their foes as hate groups makes it so much easier for the Southern Poverty Law Center to claim the high road — implying they are doing God's work by ridding us of hateful groups.

So when you think about it, those of the Southern Poverty Law Center are no better than the Spanish Inquisition who burned at the stake anyone they labeled heretics against the Roman Catholic Church.

Here is what Martin had to say on the tactic of heretics as used masterfully by those of the  Southern Poverty Law Center when they label others as hate groups.




Read more ...

ALL GUN LAWS ARE ILLEGAL IN THE USA. DECODED: THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. KNOW THEIR DUTIES.

Here is the Second Amendment:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

And here is how to read it:

[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed [since] a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state [is made from the people, who are all individuals, voluntarily].

The second amendment is one of the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. All of the Bill of Rights declare that the U.S. Government never can infringe upon aspects of being an individual, in short, the U.S. Government cannot tread over any of these personal rights.

The Bill of Rights limit what the agents of Congress can do and not what individuals can do. As I showed you in CASHING IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY, all of the Bill of Rights deals with the duties the then newly formed federal government had with respect to any individual.

The biggest failing in discourse over the Bill of Rights is the lack of talk emphasizing the duties of Congress and agents of government has to any American. It is quite clear what is meant by Congress shall make no law as we see in the opening salvo to protect any individual from an overreaching government.

All laws that infringe upon the right of any individual to keep and bear arms such as requiring permits of any kind are illegal and against the Constitution of the United States of America.

In jurisprudence, which is what we're talking about here, liberty means that realm where the law (politicians) is content to leave you alone. Where politicians make laws, there are duties and rights. Always, there can be no right without a corresponding duty and thus no duty without a corresponding right.

The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with the states in compact, which is what the rest of the Constitution details. The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with conferring rights to states.

Many phrases of every day English spell out the reality of limiting government while identifying some of the weightier aspects of being an individual. In all cases, the phrase the people means anyone, even you.

The Bill of Rights is chock full of these phrases that deal solely with any American individual. The Bill of Rights does not confer rights to groups nor does it impose duties upon individuals. Congress and the states alone have duties imposed by the Bill of Rights.


  • the people to keep and bear Arms
  • without the consent of the Owner
  • The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects
  • the persons or things to be seized
  • No person shall be held to answer 
  • nor shall any person be subject for
  • nor shall be compelled 
  • nor shall private property be taken 
  • the accused shall enjoy 
  • to be informed of the nature and cause 
  • to be confronted with 
  • to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
  • the right of trial by jury shall be preserved
  • Excessive bail shall not be required
  • retained by the people
  • or to the people
Read more ...

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

LENA DUNHAM REFUSES TO CHECK TWITTER OR HER BATHROOM SCALE. SHE SAYS TWITTER IS BAD FOR WOMEN.


Until quite recently, I never heard of this woman, an actress, Lena Dunham. Dunham came onto my radar after she began campaigning for Hillary Clinton.


However, using social justice warrior tactics, Dunham has been trying to make a name for herself to ever more Americans.

In her bid to gain greater notoriety, Dunham has come forth to say she doesn't use Twitter personally. Her anti-Twitter protest stems from her belief that every man and boy on Twitter engages in violent harassament of women.

Trying to elicit sympathy to her cause, Dunham has said, “Hey you may think that I have a fancy celebrity life where I’m hidden from this kind of thing but I to am experiencing violent bullying in the internet and it affects me also.”

Here is the reality. Lena Dunham is plain Jane in the looks department. She works in a highly-competitive business driven on looks. So to raise her profile and thus marketability to would-be movie producers, she needs to gather fandom.

Thus, Dunham has come forth with a get-involved-in-politics strategy to up her stock price.

Dunham can't change physical facts. She has a sack-of-potatoes style body that makes it much harder for movie producers to put movie goers into seats. And in her business, that is tough to overcome. Usually women with her physicality get relegated to playing the weird friend or homeless lady.

Otherwise, women like her might fetch roles in indy movies featuring lesbian stories that maybe draw 10 people to an art-house theater during a two-week run.

Read more ...

Monday, February 1, 2016

BIG WINNERS IN THE 2016 IOWA CAUCUSES — TRUMP, RUBIO, SANDERS. BIG LOSERS — CRUZ, CLINTON.


Iowans held their caucuses this evening to apportion delegates for the nominating conventions of the Republican and Democratic parties for the 2016 United States of America presidential election.

Running as Republicans, the big winners tonight are Donald Trump and Marco Rubio. Though Ted Cruz came out on top, Ted ends up being a big loser. However, the biggest loser ends up being Jeb Bush.


Republican Party





 At a paltry 2.8%, Jeb Bush gained one delegate. Worse, Jeb lost the establishment tonight. Jeb is not a viable candidate.

Trump won big tonight, or in Trump fans parlance, "yuge." The Manhattanite New Yorker had quite a strong showing in the Christianity bible belt state.

Americans are fed up with open-borders internationalism and are fed up with trade deals internationalism that kills high-paying USA jobs. That sentiment came out in tonight's results.

And in these works I showed you how Trump understands working-class Americans and their strong desire to end internationalism:




Beginning in October, I showed you the attacks on Trump in these works:



I revealed the secret sauce to Donald Trump beginning in October and why he is winning.




Tonight's results don't bode well for the natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz.  Cruz spent much resources in Iowa. Cruz masterminded Iowa. Yet, Ted Cruz barely squeaked by Trump.

Cruz is the recognized holier-than-thou bible thumper from the slate of Republican candidates. Yet, Cruz could manage only a 3.3% lead over Trump, a guy who most believe is a marginal Christian. As it is, it's quite likely Trump hasn't stepped into a church since childhood except for weddings. Cruz even had his dad campaigning, an evangelical Christian minister.

As the recognized bible thumper of the field, Cruz needed to sweep the Iowa caucus. A 10-point first place finish would have made a statement for Cruz. Instead, his squeak-by victory shows that likely he cannot appeal to most Americans.

Cruz has bigger problems. As I have shown, Ted Cruz cannot legally swear the oath of office for the presidency of the United States of America.




Keep in mind that in 1980, Reagan came in second in Iowa only 2.1% behind George Herbert Walker Bush. Reagan was the outsider candidate running for the Republican nomination in 1980. The party establishment loathed Reagan and wanted their man George Herbert Walker Bush.

In 2008, Mike Huckabee, a former baptist minister and former governor thumped the eventual Republican nominee Mitt Romney by 9.2 percentage points.

The other Republican candidates need to drop out — Bush, Kasich, Fiorina, Huckabee, Christie, Santorum, Gilmore. None managed three percent of the vote. None finished better than sixth place. Most of all, none picked up delegates.

While the Iowa Republican Caucus might not pick the winner of the GOP nomination — Iowans didn't in 1980, 1988, and 2008 — consistently they have identified the losers. No one who has come in less than fourth in Iowa has won the GOP nomination going back to 1976.

For the Democratic Party, the big shock is Bernie Sanders coming in a tie for delegates with the presumed nominee, Hillary Clinton. Keep in mind that Sanders is a Brooklynite New Yorker who was raised a Jew and who now lives in what most perceive as socialist Vermont.

Hillary Clinton is at least a professed Christian. However, as I showed you in STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?, Hillary has big problems.


Democratic Party



Although almost all pundits are slack-jawed over Trump and Sanders, I am not. In ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?, I showed you what is happening in the USA.


Read more ...

Sunday, January 31, 2016

BUSH CRONY AND CHRISTIAN POST EXEC EDITOR, A SERPENT IN THE GARDEN OF POLITICS

Today, I came across a horrible, deceptive work in The Christian Post Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders and the Populist Uprising of 2016: What Should Christians Do? by its executive editor, Richard Land. Billed as one of "The Twenty-five Most Influential Evangelicals in America" by Time Magazine, Land is a political crony of former President George W. Bush.

Richard seems to have missed Jesus' simple message all together.

First, Richard typed up a slew of words that failed to answer his question: "What should Christians do?" Yet, Land never truly answers his own posed question. Instead, he slithers in thoughts that he hopes will sway readers.

Second, Richard parrots a false belief about a polarization of Americans into parties rather than the reality of the mass of Americans having dropped out of political participation. Gary Girod at New Geography has debunked the political polarization myth in AMERICAN EXTREMISM IS A PRODUCT OF AMERICAN APATHY.

Third, Christians aren't in "God's Army"  as Richard claims, wrongly. Who could believe that omnipotent, omnipresent God needs an army of puny men?

The Mohammadans ("Muslims") believe that exactly with their deity, The Lah ("Allah"). That is why Mohammadans the earth over engage in jihad and currently are fighting in 95% of the wars among the world (see: Wars in the World, List of Ongoing Conflicts).

Fourth, Richard has it backward exactly when wrongly, Richard claims Christians are in service to God. Jesus is in service to us. God is in service to us. You don't sacrifice your children to God as if God is a petty deity, do you?

God loves each of us so much that God sacrificed his Son to us. Did Richard not read this: "For God so loved the world that He gave the only begotten Son ..."

The true gospel declares forgiveness for all with no religion needed whatsoever. The offer of the gospel is not a conditional pardon that requires man-made religious practice whatsoever, but to the enjoyment of the pardon already given to all of mankind.

You get everlasting life if you believe that Jesus is the son of God and why you have pardon for your sins. You die to eternity if you don't.

To understand the true gospel, read WHY JESUS? WHAT IS THE TRUE GOSPEL? HERE IS THE ONLY GOSPEL FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD

Fifth, while Jesus died for the world giving everyone a no-strings pardon of all your sins, Jesus instructed each individual to be loving — LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL AND WITH ALL YOUR INTELLECT. LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR AS YOURSELF.

No man or woman can love on behalf of another nor for a group of others. It is not up to a man to convince other men belong to a group — "Christians" — and then sway those men to act in concert. Doing that is politics and not following the example of Jesus — an individual showing each individual how to live.

Sixth, C. S. Lewis isn't Jesus. Ignore Richard's repeated fallacy of appeal to authority by his citations of C. S. Lewis.

Seventh, Richard commits the fallacy of consensus gentium as well as ad hominem when he writes, "Surely all Christians of good will can agree ..." In his statement, Richard has implied that only malevolent Christians would disagree with him.

I disagree wholeheartedly with Richard. Yet, I am good with Jesus.

Eight, Richard engages in an underhanded attack against fellow Christian Donald Trump when Richard writes, "That means at the very minimum, you acknowledge that personally you have sinned against God and, under moral conviction, you confess your sins to Him and ask for His forgiveness."

Richard has done exactly what his friend George W. Bush's brother has done. For video of Jeb Bush attacking a fellow Christian, see JEB BUSH CONDEMNS HIS NEIGHBOR, DONALD TRUMP.

Richard Land seemingly has such a misunderstanding of the simple message of the Gospel. Richard claims that all must confess their sins. Yet, you don't find Jesus saying so. Jesus revealed that becoming loving is the way.

The apostle John said that "If we acknowledge our sins, He is faithful and to expel our sins, and to purify us from all unrighteousness. If we that we have committed sin, we Him false. and we are not with His message" (John in 1 John 1:9-10).

Here, John means that if we acknowledge to ourselves that we sin. In no way does John mean that if we acknowledge our acts to an all-knowing, always-present God who knows our action already.

For it is only when anyone recognizes that he needs to change his ways does the beginning of change happen.

Guys like Land preach a false gospel. The offer of the gospel is not a conditional pardon that requires man-made religious practice whatsoever, but to the enjoyment of the pardon already given to all of mankind.

Now, what should anyone do if he wants to be sure he can strive in his individual effort to live as Jesus revealed?

If anyone is inclined to vote, she or he should vote for the candidate who will strive to maximize freedom — the realm where lawmakers are content not to make law and thus not to impose duty and grant right. If that is too complicated for you to understand, anyone should vote for the guy who will maximize personal liberty and thus by extension, religious liberty.

Mohammadans are against both. So any candidate who would increase Mohammadan immigration would be one for whom no one should vote.

So any candidate who would attack your living standard and make you more dependent upon Congress to survive will be the candidate who further erodes your personal liberty and thus by extension, religious liberty.

Candidates who would open the borders and flood the USA with more workers who undercut wages; candidates who would negotiate trade deals that serve the interest of a few at the expense of working-class Americans; candidates who would support a massive increase in work visas such as the H-1B program — these are the candidates who would put in jeopardy your political liberty and thus your religious liberty.
Read more ...

Saturday, January 30, 2016

1978 DEBBIE HARRY NEW WAVE PHOTO SHOWS MOHAMMADANS ("MUSLIMS") NEVER WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH POLITICAL LIBERTY AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY OF AMERICANS


This picture bled into my feed reader today. Look at the headline:

Sex and Marriage by the Ayatollah. Women Are Just Slaves



The woman in the photo is Debra Harry, the singer from Blondie. The date of the photograph is near September 3, 1978, as that is the date that Marxist-Leninist terrorist rebels of the Zimbabwe People's Revolutionary Army (ZIPRA) shot down Air Rhodesia Flight 825 killing 38. 13 survived the crash. However, the insurgents then hunted them down and shot them dead with machine guns.

Here we are 38 years late. Nothing has changed for these Mohammadans ("Muslims"). Contrast the proclamation of the Ayatollah with what Paul Kester wrote in his 1919 work titled Conservative Democracy.







Mohammadans never will be compatible with Americans and the sovereignty founded by Protestant Christians (see: CHRISTIANS FOUNDED AMERICA, NOT ATHEISTS, NOR JEWS, NOR HINDUS, NOR BUDDHISTS, NOR MUSLIMS).




Read more ...

Friday, January 29, 2016

WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS STAND WITH TRUMP. RELENTLESS ATTACKS ON TRUMP FAIL TO DERAIL THEM.

Many don't get it. They don't understand the majority of Americans who comprise middle America.



Trump is more  than repudiation of Obama. Trump is repudiation of internationalism in its widest extent — neo-conservatism of ex-Democrats in the Republican party; Bush senior's "kinder, gentler" America kowtowing to the "New World Order" of harmonized laws with the WTO and U.N; of Bill Clinton's NAFTA; of Obama's Mohammadan ("Muslim") appeasement (see: OBAMA. MR. SETBACK. THE GREAT APPEASER. OBAMA NEEDS TO WIN A NEW NOBEL PRIZE FOR APPEASEMENT).

Rightly, middle-America Americans see the policy of internationalism as failure for themselves — porous borders, legal immigrants and illegal aliens treated better than generational citizen Americans. Rightly, they see internationalism as the root cause of terrorism. And well, internationalism is.

WHY TRUMP IS WINNING. PART 2. WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS ARE FED UP. IT'S FAILED INTERNATIONALISM, STUPID.

WHY TRUMP IS WINNING. THE REST ARE INTERNATIONALIST SELLOUTS WHO STAND AGAINST WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS.

Middle America isn't merely a USA of geography. It's a USA of like-minded people with alike life stories. And of late, all of their stories seem to be the same.

They and their kinfolk have been battered by the evils of internationalism and the co-conspiracy to adhere to internationalism by the Republican Party and the Democratic Party.

✓ ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. WHY IT'S BAD FOR YOU AND A BOON FOR ANTI-CAPITALISTS.

Should Trump take the nomination and should Trump win the presidency, the biggest surprise in the post-election analysis will the huge crossover of white women voters for Donald Trump.


Van Halen were ahead of the punditry class on this way back in 2012:

Uncle Danny, had a coal tattooHe fought for the unionsSome of us still do.On my shoulder is the numberOf the chapter he was in.That number is foreverLike the struggle here to win.


Read more ...

Thursday, January 28, 2016

JEB BUSH CONDEMNS HIS NEIGHBOR, DONALD TRUMP

Jeb Bush has tried to level an attack on Donald Trump over all things Jesus.



Jeb said, "Yeah, no, he [Trump] is, he is playing this for political purposes for sure, um, you know...Accepting the fact that we make mistakes and you seek forgiveness. That's, that's one of the tenets of the Christian faith that I think all — everybody can agree on. We're all sinners! Some more than others!"

Jeb doesn't seem to recognize his neighbor as me condemns Trump.

"Condemn not, so that you may not be condemned. For according to the sentence you pronounce, you will yourself be convicted; and with the same measure with which you measure, you will be measured.
"But why do you take notice of the dust in your brother's eye, while you cannot observe the chip in your own eye? or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me remove the dust from your eye,' while the chip is in your own eye? Pretender! First remove the chip from your own eye, and then you will see straight to remove the dust from the eye of your brother."
~ Jesus in Matthew 7:1-5 
Seeking forgiveness might be a Catholic Church tenet and adopted by some sects of Protestants, all based on post-apostle Pauline teaching, but it was never a tenet of Jesus nor his actual apostles.

For more, check out: WHY JESUS? WHAT IS THE TRUE GOSPEL? HERE IS THE ONLY GOSPEL FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD




Read more ...

WHY JESUS? WHAT IS THE TRUE GOSPEL? HERE IS THE ONLY GOSPEL FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD





The apostle John said this,


"My little children, I write this to you, in order that you may not sin. And if any one should sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Christ the Righteous. And He is an offering for our sins; and not for ours alone, but also for all the world." ~ 1 John 2:1-2
and this,

For God so loved the world that He gave the only begotten Son, so that every one believing in Him should not be lost, but have eternal life. For God did not send His Son to the world that He might condemn the world; but that He might save the world through Him. The believer in Him will not be condemned; whoever does not trust however, is already convicted because he has not confided on the only begotten Son of God. And the indictment is this: that the Light came into the world and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, because their practices were wicked. ~ John in John 3:16-19

God, through the sacrifice of his son, has put away the sin of the world, of every individual of the world. Jesus has the power to save the entire world, not merely some of the world.

The good telling, the good spell  —  the gospel —  is the declaration to all that God loves us and has washed away our sins in the life, death and resurrection of his son.

You get everlasting life if you believe that Jesus is the son of God and why you have pardon for your sins. You die to eternity if you don't.

Believing in the gospel is believing that all of your sins past, present and future are forgiven through Jesus. If you only believed this, you would be less inclined to sin at all and more inclined to love everyone you meet as Jesus loves you even now.

Believing isn't mere acknowledgment nor is it assertion. To believe is to do more than proclaim something as true. The truest meaning of believe is to to hold dear, to love.

Your many sins are forgiven. If you love much, if you love Jesus, if you love God, then you have everlasting life.

Jesus put away your sins already. Jesus did all the work, already. You have a free, no-strings pardon of all your sins.

The pardon of sin comes to us through Jesus as told in the gospel arising solely from God and is declared to all without exception and independent of any character or quality any of us might have. No man need be a possessor of any particular quality. Whatever qualities a man possesses or lacks, however sinful, this forgiveness of sins already has happened through Jesus and it comes to us as truth from God.

To not believe Jesus has put away your sins is to let yourself to be deceived by Satan himself.  As long as you doubt this truth that your sins are already forgiven and thus you don't need to ask for a pardon, your heart will remain shut.

If you don't know you have been pardoned already, how can you look upon God but with distrust? And if you look at your pardon coming from anything but God, how can you look at God as the fountain of your life?

Those who don't trust Jesus and the good spell told about Jesus but rather love their religion and religious practices instead, doubting the straightforward message of Jesus to love and enjoy the pardon already given them, have been indicted.

You don't get a pardon of sins by begging for a pardon, by asking for forgiveness, by adhering to religion. God hasn't asked anyone to grovel.

Those who tell you that you will gain pardon because you practice religion have misled you. By following them, to gain pardon then, you must have confidence in yourself  to achieve. You must cling to yourself, glorifying yourself should you believe you have succeeded.

Praying for a pardon from God, trying hard to show your piety and that you're dutiful to God or doing any other sacrifice in fear of God hoping that God will forgive you and protect you is false religion. It's the stuff of savages slaughtering animals to their idols.

Do you believe our all-everything God needs to be appeased? You don't need to appease God with sacrifices of any kind. Only a petty deity would demand sacrifices. Only a weak god would demand such evil. Only lying men would tell you otherwise.

Isn't is true right now that you believe if you do rituals, prayers and other sacrifices, you will have kept your part of the bargain? And so, isn't this what drives you to church and to do all of your rituals and prayers? Isn't this what comforts you? Isn't this what makes you believe your brand of religion is right? Do you believe God charges you a price for your safety both for here-and-now and forever?

Living that way, you submit yourself to fear and selfish hope. Do you love another by being selfish? Do you love by fearing whom you love? Living that way, you become a practical atheist.

You don't ever need to pray in public nor do you need to go to church. Church rituals and prayers can't put away your sins.  You don't need to fear God. You don't need to tremble.

The true gospel declares forgiveness for all with no religion needed whatsoever. Those who fail to rejoice in this truth, are guilty of making God a liar.

The offer of the gospel is not a conditional pardon that requires man-made religious practice whatsoever, but to the enjoyment of the pardon already given to all of mankind.

Think about it more. Not only does God want no sacrifices but because God is so loving, God made a sacrifice for each of you, the highest sacrifice, the life of his loving son, the life of Jesus.

Interestingly, God sacrificed Jesus to anyone and everyone in sort of an inversion of sacrifice.  The whole purpose of the inversion sacrifice is for the proverbial cartoon light bulb to alight over anyone's head for that ah ha! moment when someone sees in his mind — God loves me so much he did this for me.

Loving others is the answer then. True strength comes from kindness, simply being kind to those who live impetuously, recklessly, thoughtlessly.

Living with the gospel is about eradicating ill-will in one's heart by awaking to the love of God and having the law of love written in one's heart.

No one shall be condemned for sinning. Only those who have harden their hearts by rejecting God's love as given in his sacrifice of Jesus shall be guilty. Having turned away from God, by rejecting God's sacrifice, thus unloving to God, those with hardened hearts call God a liar. For this, they are guilty.

Many simply fail to grasp this straightforward message of Jesus. Let's let Jesus do the talking:

"Because," He answered, "it is granted to you to become acquainted with the secrets of the Kingdom of Heaven; but it is not granted to others. For whoever has a possession, it will increase with him; but the one who possesses nothing, even what he has will be torn from him. I therefore speak to them in parables, because seeing they see not, and hearing they do not hear, neither will they understand." ~ Jesus in Matthew 13:11-13

"Therefore, every one who listens to these precepts of Mine, and practices them, I will compare him to a reflective man who built his house upon the rock: and the storm raged, and the floods came, and the wind blew, and assailed that house; and it fell not — because it was founded upon the rock. And every one who listens to these precepts of Mine, and does not practice them, I will compare him to a foolish man who built his dwelling in the sand: and the storm raged, and the floods came, and the wind blew, and they demolished that house, and its wreck was complete!" ~ Jesus in Matthew 7:24-27

So what are Jesus' precepts?

Jesus answered him "LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL AND WITH ALL YOUR INTELLECT. That command is first, and most important. But the second is equal to it: LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR AS YOURSELF. In these two commands are comprised the whole law and the prophets." ~ Jesus in Matthew 22:27-39

And again:

"The first," answered Jesus, "is, ISRAEL, LISTEN! THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD; AND YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND ALL YOUR SOUL, AND ALL YOUR INTELLECT, AND ALL YOUR STRENGTH. That is the first command; and the second is like it, YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR AS YOUR OWN SELF. No other commands are greater than these." ~ Jesus in Mark 12:29-31

And what does Jesus say the rock is? It's not Simon who Jesus calls a mere ordinary stone, hence the name Peter that Jesus gave to Simon. The rock is the rock-solid truth of unconditional forgiveness of your sins through Jesus' resurrection that puts away sin of mankind combined with living the way of loving. And Jesus could be this rock because Jesus is the healer, the Son of the living God.

"And I also tell you that you are a stone; and upon this Rock I will build My assembly, and the gates of the Grave shall not overpower it. And to you I will give the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven; and whatever you may bind upon earth shall bound in heaven; and whatever may dissolve upon earth shall be dissolved in heaven."
~ Jesus in Matthew 16:18-19
And from where does Jesus say anyone must get his way, is it man-made religion or from the loving God?

There was however among the Pharisees, a man named Nicodemus, one of the Judean princes. He came to Him during the night, and said to Him, "Rabbi we know that You are a Teacher come from God; because no one could produce the proofs which You do unless God were with him." "Most assuredly I tell you," replied Jesus, "that unless any one is born from above he cannot see the Kingdom of God." 

Nicodemus therefore asked: "How can a man be born when he is old? Can he be conceived of his mother a second time and be born?" "Most assuredly I tell you," replied Jesus, "that if a man is not born from water and Spirit, he is unable to enter into the Kingdom of God. That which is born from the flesh is flesh; and that which is born from the Spirit is spirit. Do not be surprised that I told you, 'You must be born from above.' The Spirit indeed breathes where He pleases, and you hear His voice; but yet you neither see where He comes from, nor where He goes: so it is with all born of the Spirit." ~ Jesus in John 3:1-8

And how should anyone become?

About that time, the disciples approached Jesus, inquiring, "Who is the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven?" Then Jesus, calling a child to Him, placed him in the midst of them, and said: "I tell you indeed that if you do not turn back, and become like those children, you will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Whoever therefore may humble himself like this child, he is the most exalted in the Kingdom of Heaven." Jesus in Matthew 18:1-4

Jesus never said he was building a church, nor did Jesus say he was starting a religion or hiring anyone to be the head of a religion on his behalf.

Jesus exemplifies to us that while we have this earthly life, if we turn our back to our old selves, so caught up in pride, showing off and being a partaker of the earthly world, and thus die to it, rejecting our sinning ways, we can resurrect ourselves through love, which is what Jesus commanded, and which is the essence of God.

The whole of it is believing, putting your faith in Jesus that this is so and then living by being loving.  Jesus alone has done all the work for every man.

The true gospel is forgiveness through the sacrifice of Jesus, an act already, which has been done. Jesus already has finished the work. Jesus put away your sins.

It is for this that you should be rejoicing and loving that no matter what, when you take this truth to your heart, which is the true way of taking Jesus into your heart, you can get up off your knees, and begin to live in the right way, the loving way.


Loving is action that needs no defense. Loving is 100% offense.

Loving heals the ill-will of your heart. And you heart will become a loving heart through no power of your own when you come to see that through Jesus, God already put away your sins, all of them, having done so because God loves you.

Gaining a loving heart is your salvation. That's right. Loving is the source of salvation. There is no other way to gain salvation.

Could you be loving and then become spiteful? Could you be loving and then become a thief? Could you be loving and then become a murderer? Could you be loving and then become an adulterer? Could you be loving and then become a liar?

Does a child endlessly debate a spate of words like salvation, repentance, atonement, and so on, or does the child gush loving because loving is natural to the child?

Love God for God created all, me, you everyone, our earth, everything. God gives to everyone equally, whether they are good or bad, sunshine, rain and all the useful things on the earth. Love Jesus for Jesus found mankind beset living mostly as the bad in a beaten state. Jesus healed the wounds of souls by using his word and life so that all who listen and believe, Jesus shall carry to everlasting life.

God loves us and gave us Jesus. It's God's word alone that gives both life here-and-now and everlasting life. So trust in Jesus, believe in Jesus and say so freely to any.

And should you have enemies, await them always, hoping they will turn from evil and become your friend in brotherhood, no matter what they said or did in the past, should they come also to love God and love Jesus as God always awaits anyone and then accepts those who comes to trust Jesus and believe in Jesus. As God gives all of the goodness of the earth even to those in the throes of evil, so should you await your enemies in the same way.

Beware though. Religion and religious teaching and being pious to religious teaching is worthless. Religious ritual in no way gives you everlasting life.

True living, the kind that makes you feel good when you're awake requires doing love in every moment, which is to say be loving. If you're loving you can't be evil. If you're loving you can have the best life, the most fulfilling, the richest without needing riches.


The good spell (gospel) from John is clear:

  • God so loved the world.
  • God gave us Jesus.
  • All who believe in Jesus are not lost but have everlasting life.
  • Once you come to believe in Jesus, Jesus won't lose you .
  • Jesus isn't here to condemn the world and wipe it away.
  • Jesus is here even now to save the world.
  • Those who don't believe in Jesus and thus don't trust Jesus have been convicted and will get justice.
  • Those who trust in Jesus and believe in Jesus say so freely to any and thus let their conduct be seen because they have come to the light, which is God.
  • It is the design, purpose, aim, object, will of God for everyone of mankind who understands, to experience and receive Jesus himself and thus have everlasting life.
  • The word of God alone, that which is loving, is what gives life and life everlasting, for God is love ("The Spirit is the life-giver"). 
  • Religion, religious teaching and being pious to religious teaching is worth nothing as ("the body is worth nothing").
  • Religious, attending temple, following ritual in no way gets anyone to God and fails to yield everlasting life.
  • Only through Jesus himself and his word and belief in Jesus is how anyone gets everlasting life because the "it" Jesus talks about is the word given by Jesus and not the teaching of men in temples, synagogues and churches precisely because Jesus has the word directly from God.
  • Fear not that because you have been pardoned from all your done sins that you will keep sinning. For if you gain an all-loving heart, what drives you to sin shall die. And your all-loving heart comes from seeing God loving you because your sins have been pardoned away in God's sacrifice of Jesus for you.

Let these words dwell in you. For when you do, you will know how to love God with all of your heart. Your distrust of God will be no more. You will come to see what it means to be loving.

This truth is for every woman and every man whether old or young.

Read more ...