TRUMP WINS AGAIN. TAKES SOUTH CAROLINA. KILLS THE BUSH DYNASTY AS LOW-ENERGY JEB! DROPS OUT. IT'S STILL THE ECONOMY, STUPID. MRS. BILL CLINTON WINS IN NEVADA, BUT BARELY.

Pro-American restorationist candidate Trump slaughtered his rivals for the GOPher party delegates in South Carolina today. Trump has secured all 50 delegates from South Carolina. That is a scathing win.



Trump's victory continues to surprise pundits but not Americans who have suffered since the collapse of peak GDP, which came in the fourth quarter of 2007. Since then American families have been wrecked by lengthened unemployment and lower wages.

For more on the economy, see my companion publication, OBAMA, YELLEN, BERNANKE AND MANY OTHERS HAVE LIED, SOVIET-STYLE ABOUT THE FALSE RECOVERY, COUNTLESS TIMES. YOU ARE STILL LIVING IN THE GREATEST DEPRESSION.

Trump managed to win South Carolina by only spending $35,600 each delegate. Rubio spent $12,050,000 and came up empty as did Ted Cruz who spent $7,070,000.

As well, Trump has spent the fewest dollars spent for each delegate. As a successful billionaire businessman, this should surprise no one. Trump knows how to process intel about markets.

Trump is much smarter at politics than the professional politicians.Politicians are wasteful. Politicians rely upon leeching consultants. Politicians are not smart.

After New Hampshire, I wrote that Jeb Bush was not viable as a candidate. South Carolina proved my claim. So it is no surprise that Jeb did Americans a favor and dropped out tonight.

Jeb was on pace to spend $26.7 billion to win the nomination. No nomination has ever required that much spending. Jeb spent 135 times more for each of his delegates than Donald Trump spent.





As can be seen, Marco Rubio is on pace to spend $6.9 billion to win the nomination. That insane sum of spending will not win Rubio the presidency. Rubio is not a viable candidate and needs to drop out.

Canadian natural-born Ted Cruz and illegal candidate (see: my works on Ted Cruz to know why cannot swear the oath of office of the presidency) would need to spend 8.6 times more than Donald Trump to win the nomination. That kind of spending would push the illegal candidate Cruz to about $1.7 billion.

Donald Trump would need to spend $162.1 million to win the nomination. This is a reasonable sum and well below what either Hillary Clinton ($1.118 billion) or Bernie Sanders ($924 million) must spend to win their Democratic Party nomination.

As I shared with you in THE LAST GASPS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. WHAT REINCE PRIEBUS MUST DO TO RESCUE THE INTERNATIONALIST GLOBALIZATION GOPHER PARTY FROM THE DONALD TRUMP JUGGERNAUT, GO ALL IN WITH JOHN KASICH, if the GOPher Party establishment does not want to work with Trump, their best shot at beating Trump going forward is to back Kasich, in spite of tonight's results.

Also, beware of false political polls trying to take down Trump. Rupert Murdoch tried to do with his Wall Street Journal. There is much false polling relying upon unscientific methods. For more on that, see THE AUGUSTA CHRONICLE, NBC TV, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL AND MARIST COLLEGE ENGAGE IN POLLING DECEPTION FOR THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PRIMARY

The Democratic Party held a caucus in Nevada today. The wife of former president Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton snagged four more delegates than socialist Bernie Sanders.

Though Hillary Clinton won, the race was close. A close race doesn't bode well for Hillary. If Bernie could spend more, he could tip the balance in his favor. 

Hillary spent $196,579 each delegate while Bernie spent 2.58 times more than Hillary, having spent $507,333 each delegate. 

Both candidates are on pace to spend around one billion dollars to secure the nomination. 

The Democratic Party held a caucus on 

Delegates nominate. Primaries and caucuses exist to secure delegates for the nomination.

According to The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process by the Council on Foreign Relations:

In 2016, a Democratic candidate must secure at least 2,382 out of 4,763 delegates to become the party’s nominee. The number of delegates allocated to each state takes into account the state’s Democratic vote in the previous three presidential elections and its assigned number of Electoral College votes.

Meanwhile, a Republican candidate must secure at least 1,237 out of 2,472 delegates to win the party’s nomination. The Republican Party allocates each state ten delegates, plus three for each congressional district, and bonus delegates for states that contributed electoral votes to the party in the previous presidential election, as well those that elected Republicans to high offices.

Read more ...

TRUMP HAS "YUGE" WIN. TRUMP AFFECTS THE OUTCOME FOR HILLARY AS SHE FEELS TRUMP'S "BERN." TRUMP IS THE MOST INTERESTING MAN IN POLITICS.

Two candidates stood tall among their competitors in their respective parties. Donald Trump smashed his Republican Party establishment rivals capturing more than twice as many votes as the runner up John Kasich and more than three times as many votes as other Republican Party establishment candidates — Cruz, Jeb Bush, Rubio.




For the Democrats, for every 100 voters for Hillary Clinton, there were 154 for Bernie Sanders. So how did Bernie win?

First, all should notice that as a senator from Vermont, Sanders could be considered a favored-son candidate in next door New Hampshire. Yet, here are the reasons:

1. The Democratic Party continues to shift further left.
2. As even more of a leftist, Bernie Sanders is the heir apparent to Obama.
3. Three movements have pushed the Democratic Party left — Occupy Wall Street, Obamacare, #blackslivesmatter (see:  Have Democrats Pulled Too Far Left? Peter Wehner, New York Times, May 27, 2015)
4. Hillary is a Blue Dog (near-center) as her husband was. 
5. Skilled white Americans who aren't college grads and who come from traditional Democrat families will be voting for Trump if they vote.

#BlackLivesMatter has put white Democrats under scrutiny. Because Hillary is in the race to become the first woman president along with the sex scandals of her husband as well as her own scandals, Hillary is failing under that scrutiny (see: STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?)

Bernie is the guy who wants to give it all to the down-trodden — no-job blacks, fast-food Hispanics, no-hubby young mommies — and take all from rich white folks who are only rich because of white privilege.

In short, Bernie won the young new Democrat vote while the blue-collar white traditional household Democrats either stayed home in protest against Hillary or because they plan to vote for Trump in the general election.

As I wrote back in late November, NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH, Trump is that extraordinary white guy.

Back on November 14, 2014, in Why Democrats Can’t Win Over White Working-Class Voters, Jamelle Bouie of Slate (disclosure: I don't read Slate. I found the work by googling), wrote that white working-class Americans without college degrees no longer want anything to do with the Democratic Party. 

Bouie stated, "Democrats don’t have to win this group as much as they have to avoid a rout." Hillary is the kind of Democrat who needs that group but they're going for Trump. 

In the absence of white, no-college, skilled working-class voters, the remaining Democrats who show up to the polls are the leftists. So it should surprise no one, the leftists voted for Bernie.

It should be clear. Trump is having a huge effect on both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Trump might be more responsible for Bernie Sander's success than Sanders himself.

Donald Trump slaughtered the establishment Republican Party candidates today. Trump did so without wasted effort. Trump visited New Hampshire a small number but the right number of times. Trump focused his campaigning in a narrow geographic corridor near the Massachusetts border and along the coast.

John Kasich the Ohio governor who always talks about his post office working dad spent big to win a distant second. Some reports say Kasich spent as much as $14 million. Kasich also visited tiny New Hampshire 100 times or so.

Kasich put his marbles in winning New Hampshire because his strategy is to avoid the south and focus on the Northeast and the Great Lakes. 

Natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz squeaked passed Jeb Bush for third. Cruz barely won last week in the burnt-over state, Iowa. And Cruz needed shenanigans to swipe Ben Carson's support. 

Likely, Cruz picked up voters from race dropout Rand Paul. New Hampshire swings libertarian as it is known as the home of the Free State Project.

Cruz continues to face questions about his likely illegal campaign. For more on that see:

• TED CRUZ COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HIGHEST SERVICE TO HER MAJESTY, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, IN CANADA. SO HOW CAN TED BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA?
• TAKE OFF, EH. IS TED CRUZ IS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN? PUNDIT LAWYERS GET THIS SO WRONG, THE HOSERS.
• THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
• WAS TED CRUZ A U.S. CITIZEN AT BIRTH? THE MCCARRAN-WALTER ACT (THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT OF 1952) WHICH THE RULED OVER HIM SAYS YES, BUT IT ALSO COULD HAVE STRIPPED HIM OF CITIZENSHIP

Most Americans are neither conservatives nor socialists. Many Americans don't vote. 

Most Americans are hopeful restorationists. Like most good Americans, Trump is a restorationist. Trump set the restorationist agenda — Make America Great Again.

Trump is the candidate disparate voters have sought for a long time. To Tea Party people, Trump is the Tea Party candidate. For Pat Buchanan types, Trump is the Buchanan candidate. For Ross Perot types, Trump is the Perot candidate.

Trump is the Restorationist candidate who can capture power from the establishment Republican Party. 

For more on the rise of the restorationists, check out my key works:

• THE FOUNDERS OF THE USA WERE RADICALS. THEY WERE NEVER CONSERVATIVES NOR TRIBALISTS. YOU MIGHT BE A RESTORATIONIST BUT LIKELY YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE NOR TRIBALIST.
• WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS AND THE FORTHCOMING NATIONAL PARTY OF FREE-CAPITALISM PROGRESSIVES. THE GLOBALIZATION PARTY TIME OF INTERNATIONALISTS COULD BE COMING TO AN END IN THE USA.
• WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS STAND WITH TRUMP. RELENTLESS ATTACKS ON TRUMP FAIL TO DERAIL THEM.

And to understand the seismic shift in American politics, check out: ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?

Read more ...

ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?

Pundits everywhere expected Hillary Clinton to become the next president of the United States without much of a contest against a Republican Party challenger. No one expected Hillary to be in a fight for her political life for her own party's nomination.

Bernie Sanders, the other candidate for the Democratic Party nominee is beginning to be taken seriously. Sanders now leads Clinton by 27 points in New Hampshire. Sanders is running in a dead heat with Clinton in Iowa.

Sanders is part of the socialist wing of the Democratic Party. Through eight years of Obama, the Socialist Democrats have emerged as the main force of the Democratic Party. This has been a long time in the making (think: Occupy Wall Street, #BlackLivesMatter).

Socialist Democrats have vied for control of the Democratic Party since the conservative coalition collapsed and much of the Deep South transformed into a Republican stronghold. That transformation began with Nixon's Southern Strategy and peaked with the Republican Revolution when the last of the conservative Democrats retired.

For a detailed description of the major party tenets, see below.

The trend in USA politics has been polarization. Obama is the leader of the leftist, Marxist-Socialist Democrats.  They are the mainstream Democratic party these days.  They wrested control of the party from New Democrats when Bill Clinton retired. There are few Blue Dog / New Democrats with any clout in the party. They are the conservative Democrats. They hardly exist within the party. The Blue Dog Coalition consists of 14 members.

Those of the myopic mainstream media assumed Hillary Clinton would follow Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton is not the heir to Obama. Bernie Sanders is the proper candidate to replace Obama in this natural progression of polarization.

Hillary Clinton is running for the wrong party. Hillary belongs with all of the other ex-conservative Democrats, the neoconservatives in the Republican Party who have joined ranks with the long-established internationalist-interventionist Rockefeller Republicans.

While the Democratic Party has been pulling hard left, the GOPher Party has been moving center-left to the soft liberal internationalist position. Even guys like Rand Paul advocate open borders (see: RAND PAUL GOES FULL RETARD, SIDES WITH DEMOCRATS AND TURNS HIS BACK ON WORKING-CLASS GENERATIONAL AMERICANS). They all do — Cruz, Rubio, Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell.

True American Conservatism is a special kind of conservatism. It's a Bill of Rights nationalism that strives for the benefits of all citizenry by establishing a general welfare.

Trump represents a new dimension in USA politics — working-class, Bill of Rights nationalism. Trump is changing the game in a game that has been changing for awhile. Trump is the true right-wing, conservative candidate. Trump is trying to preserve the USA as it was before the ongoing international drift of NATO-UN-NAFTA-WTO-TPP.

Third party candidates generally offer the alternative to the political establishment. Trump is that candidate already.

Trump is the true American Conservative in this race, already. Also, Trump is the third-party style alternative-to-the-establishment candidate already.

Authentic Conservatism doesn't mean moral prudery. Only dimwits associate church-going religion and chastity with conservatism.

Progressivism promotes specific welfare, and specific subsidy. Progressivism promotes open-borders internationalism. Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan and even Ted Cruz — these guys are left-wing, internationalist republicans who push for the interests of major shareholders in oligopolist transnational corporations. They're all anti-nationalists.

Trump is the only candidate who can beat Hillary in a historic vote — a chance to put a woman in office. Trump is doing what no candidate of either party can do. Trump is bringing out the white, not-a-college-grad vote (see: WHY TRUMP IS WINNING. THE REST ARE INTERNATIONALIST SELLOUTS WHO STAND AGAINST WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS)

Likely, Trump will beat any candidate in this election. Considering that Sanders is the true heir to Obama, here is a good contrast between Obama idealism and Trump idealism.

Obama: "They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

"If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Trump: Close the borders. Build a wall. No more bad trade deals. I built a great company and you can to in a real America. I'm 100% for the Second Amendment. I'm an evangelical Christian. Let's make America great again.
Is there any wonder why Trump is winning?

————

Understanding the alignment in USA politics.

The Democratic Party is the left party, the party of socialism, the party of communitarianism (see: BEATING THE DRUMS FOR OBAMA TRIBALISM). The party still has vestiges of Blue Dog / conservative Democrats. The Democratic Party is an open-borders internationalist party but is against reciprocal free trade. Thus the party opposes NAFTA, CAFTA-DR and TPP. Yet, party favors supremacy of internationalist organizations with diminished sovereignty for the United States. This party appeals to welfare seekers and those of ethnicity, especially poorly-educated, low IQ ethnicity.

Main faces: Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama

The Democratic-Republican Party is an unofficial center-left party that one day likely will come into existence. Democratic-Republicans are a pro-big business internationalist party that favors heavily immigration as a means to suppress wages. This is a pro-Wall Street party. This is a pro-international interventionist party. They are major champions of the status quo. This party appeals to college-educated guilt-ridden, self-loathing liberals. This party appeals to lawyers, those who work in the medical establishment and mainstream government workers.

Main faces: Hillary Clinton, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz

The True American Party / The USA Party is an unofficial right party. It is the true conservative party for Americans. They are trying to restore Bill of Rights Individualism and the Protestant work ethic that shaped the USA from the founding of the USA until 1965. This party is pro-nationalist and anti-interventionist but with a strong military. This is a walk softly but carry a big stick party. This party appeals to mainstream, Main Street working-class Americans, no-college white Americans with at least Ellis Island ancestry if not earlier.

Main Faces: Donald Trump

Read more ...

THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE.

In a work for the Washington Post titled, Is the United States of America a Republic or a Democracy? legal guy Eugene Volokh at UCLA Law claims Americans have a republic — citizens have the power to vote for officers and rerepresentatives — and a representative democracy — government by elected representatives.

In his work, Volokh, a native of the former communist Ukraine, in establishment apologist fashion tells his readers that "in addition to being a representative democracy, the United States is also a constitutional democracy, in which courts restrain in some measure the democratic will." Though he might be a bright guy, Volokh stretches the truth. It is the very design of the US itself through amendments to the Constitution along with public law passed by Congress that limits the democratic will.

Reality is far different from what Volokh preaches at UCLA Law and what millions of school children learn each year in America. Americans do not have representative democracy. Americans don't have democracy of any kind.

When the founders designed the United States of America with the second constitution, the founders wanted Americans to have popular representation and states' legislatures to have representation. To give Americans popular representation, they created the House of Representatives. To give states legislatures representation, they created the Senate.

For more on this, you can read about the Connecticut Compromise. Likely, most of you never heard of the Connecticut Compromise during your high school years because your states' legislators had a agenda for you to serve their purposes.

There is reason why the founders required a census in Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The reason has nothing to do with how many Hispanics there are in the USA or how many blacks or how many females. The founders design a census into the system so that Americans could have popular representation.

Sadly, today, the dictators of Congress use the census as rhetorical justification to dole out welfare to key supporting constituencies.

The United States of America as the founders intended with the Constitution of 1787 and ratified on June 21, 1788, began to die in 1870. America moved ever closer to death beginning 1910.


Representative Democracy (left). Oligarchy Illusory Democracy (right).

Americans have the right to vote. That is it.

Every election, Americans are given the choice between candidates who are branded products. In short, Americans are given the choice between Coca-cola or Pepsi (see here: AMERICAN POLITICS. 136 YEARS AGO, JAMES SAYLES BROWN DESCRIBED IT PERFECTLY!)

Voting is mere illusion. Voting does not equal representation.

If you hover over each state, you can see how many adults, 18 and up, each
House representative in that state represents.

Map 1. Number of Adult Americans for Each Member of the House of Representatives

Residents of the State of Montana have the least representation. Residents of the District of Columbia have the most representation. Yet, in a cruel twist, those who represent them are mere delegates who can't vote on bills. They can only work as committee members. 

Reality gets worse when you discover that on a full-time, 40-hour work week with no time in D.C., a representative could give mere seconds to each of his adult constituents — seriously seconds. Hover over your state and see it for yourself.

Map 2. Number of Seconds Each Adult American Can be Given by their Representative, for a Full-time, 40-hour work week and no trips to D.C.



Now, if Americans were to have a truly representative democracy, one where each adult could at least sit with his or her representative for 15 minutes, once a year and still have their representatives go to Congress for three months to hash out the only most important matters of Americans, here are the number of representatives Americans need by each states.

Map 3. 15 Minutes Once a Year with One's Representative with the Representative Three-Months in D.C., Number of Representatives Needed in Each State




Californians alone would need over six times the number of representatives than the whole House of Representatives now!

And here is what it would look like if representatives only gave 10 minutes to each adult, 18 and older while still hanging out in D.C. for three months.

Map 4. 10 Minutes Once a Year with One's Representative with the Representative Three-Months in D.C., Number of Representatives Needed in Each State

Californians would still need over four times as many representatives as the whole of the House now.

Here is how many representatives Americans would need in each state if Congress adhered to the Constitution and had each House member represent 30,000 adults.

Map 5. 30,000 Adults each Representative, Number of Representatives Needed in Each State



Bernie Sanders is quick to rail against billionaires and Wall Street, but Bernie never mentions the true problem — the lack of popular representation. Hillary Clinton is merely the light version of Bernie. Hillary makes almost the same attacks but is much softer about hers.

Shouldn't that make you wonder about Bernie and Hillary or anyone like them who claims he or she has the plan to make America better for Americans?

The jokers running for Team Red, the Republicans, don't even attack anyone who they claim is harming America. They too don't want you to know the most pressing problem that has been facing Americans for years upon years, decades even.

You can be sure the people behind the Center for Civic Education never mention this.

Campaign financing by the rich isn't the problem no matter how many times Bernie Sanders lies to you saying it is and no matter how many times Hillary Clinton lies to you saying it is.

You and all other Americans who are not part of the establishment have only one problem: You don't have a representative democracy. You live under a dictatorship of a well-organized minority.

The lack of popular representation is the true problem all of us Americans face. It should be the only election issue. If you want to fix America, you must spread the word on this.

Anyone who believes Americans live under a representative democracy has been bamboozled. Anyone who knows better and still makes the claim suffers from corrupted morality.

If only you lived under a representative democracy, there would be many political parties with no party dominant. The Democrats and the Republicans would be powerless in themselves. They would need to form coalitions with other parties and yield much of their desires to a bigger cause.

Only the most important bills would rise to the top and become law. You would have much more freedom. People who work for Congress in the various agencies overseen by the President would show you much respect.

If you lived under a representative democracy, having a high income or low income wouldn't matter nor would having much property (right of ownership) or no property in anything. You would be on equal footing with the richest man whom your representative would represent.

This is what the founders wanted for us 227 years later. Alas, we don't have it because the Democrats and the Republicans perpetuate the Biggest Lie.

If you are an American adult or soon to be an adult, likely this is the most important work you have yet read in your life. After reading this, I encourage you to read Thomas Paine's Common Sense.

You can be sure that not one candidate from either of those establishment parties would ever want you to have representation. That is why their parties colluded in during the Quiet Revolution to freeze permanently the House membership to 435 and only later did they add another three delegates for D.C.

You might like these:

• HATERS OF TEAM ELEPHANTS FOOLISHLY BLAME THE RICH FOR THE LOSS BY TEAM DONKEYS. OTHERS BLAME OBAMA. NONE HAVE IT RIGHT. HERE IS WHY. — This one shows the rapid decline of representative democracy of Americans through our history.
• THE REAL REASON WHY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WORK FOR AMERICANS ANYMORE.
• STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?
• 50 SHADES OF BERNIE SANDERS.
• A BRILLIANT LADY AND WHY DONALD TRUMP IS MOST POPULAR WITH AMERICANS

Read more ...

50 SHADES OF BERNIE SANDERS.

So back in 1972, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who now is the lone socialist American holding high office, wrote a bizarre work published by the Vermont Freeman. This has become news because the socialist Sanders seeks the Democratic Party nomination to run for the presidency of the USA.

Sanders began by revealing likely his own masturbation fantasy in the opening two sentences of his work, "A man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied, a woman abused." After all, how would Sanders know what the majority of American male masturbators think about when they flog themselves?

Not to be outdone by himself, in only the third sentence of the work, Sanders wrote, "A woman enjoys intercourse with her man – as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously." No where in the work does Sanders cite any scientific studies that detail what women fantasize about during sex with their husbands or boyfriends.

Apologists for Sanders want all to believe Sanders was enslaved to a hippy, stream-of-consciousness writing episode, a sort of writing epilepsy. A guy named Michael Briggs, a spokesman for Sanders claims Sanders was stupid and thus produced a "dumb attempt at dark satire."

Clearly, the work isn't satire. The word satire entered into English in the late 1300s from the Middle French word satire meaning work intended to ridicule vice or folly.

There isn't anything in Sander's stream-of-consciousness fantasies that could be construed as satire. What vice did Sander's ridicule? Is masturbation a vice? Is having sexual fantasy a vice?

If not vice, whose folly did Sanders ridicule? Is it folly to have sexual fantasies?

And why does a senator of the United States Congress need a spokesman? Shouldn't senators be like Cicero, the famous Roman senator orator?

Briggs claims that, "When Bernie got into this race he understood there would be
attempts to distract voters from the real issues." Bernie himself has distracted voters with his masturbatory fantasies.

Update:

On Sunday, Bernie himself said, "This is a piece of fiction that I wrote in 1972...you know, something like Fifty Shades of Grey." Bernie Sanders confessed to be a writer of erotic literature, a work filled with sadomasochistic imagery derived from his mind — masturbating to thoughts of bound and tortured submissive females and his hoping females want to be raped and not merely raped but gang raped for who knows how long, except Bernie himself.

From what source did Bernie draw to write, but from his own mind and his own thoughts? Did Bernie not first imagine thoughts of masturbating, binding and torturing kneeling women, before writing those thoughts to paper?

And even if Bernie were into BDSM, as long as he were involved with consenting adults, no one else should care. However, rape means a crime precisely because the victim has not consented to sex. It's quite twisted to believe that women want to be forced to have sex against their wills because women prefer being raped. It's even creepier to write about it in erotic literature hoping to bring others to arousal.

In spite of the claims by some apologists for Bernie, women don't have rape fantasies. 

According to a peer-reviewed scientific-method study conducted by academicians at the University of Montreal (Quebec, Canada), women have fantasies about being dominated sexually (64.6%), having sex with an unknown person (48.9%), and being tied up for sexual pleasure (52.1%).

Yet, only 30.9% fantasize about sex with two men. Only 36.3% fantasize about being spanked or whipped for sexual pleasure. And only 28.9% fantasize about being forced to have sex.

In no fantasy about being dominated or being forced to have sex do women ever state they want to be raped by three guys. Having consensual sex with a stranger is a far cry from being brutally raped by three men at the same time. That is Bernie's fantasy!

All should be reminded that Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont, is running for president for the USA. Perhaps Sanders ought to quit the senate, quit running for president and take up what could be his true calling, writing mediocre erotic literature.

Is this Bernie's campaign theme song:

Read more ...