IS POPE FRANCIS ATHEISTIC? POPE FRANCIS ABANDONS GOD AS HE PREACHES GLOBAL WARMING DOOM AND GLOOM

When asked about never-proven-by-science man-made global warming during his carbon-spewing jet flight back to Vatican City from Africa, the CEO of the Roman Catholic Church, the Italian-based commercial religious firm, Pope Francis said, "I can say that it is now or never. We are on the edge of suicide."


Pope Francis seems to doubt that God will be there for mankind. Pope Francis more or less said that God will turn his back upon mankind and fail to save his creation from suicide. Instead, the Pope seems to put his faith, his trust such ordinary men as politicians.

One would have believed that a guy who heads up a firm specializing in selling weekly lectures about hope and salvation would hold a positive outlook toward the supreme being who created the universe and all that it contains.

Maybe Pope Francis has never heard of Noah and the book of Genesis found in most Old Testaments. Here we are more than seven billion of mankind later.

Read more ...

SOLAR PROPAGANDISTS TAKE FLIGHT. SOLAR IMPULSE 2 CAN ONLY FLY ONE PASSENGER — THE PILOT.

So today, a friend of mine sent me a live video feed of a test flight of a solar powered airplane flying between Japan and Hawaii. According to those behind Solar Impulse, if the airplane can make it, those piloting the plane will fly five long days to circumnavigate the earth by flight.



If men could design enough energy output from solar, already mankind would have solar planes. So why hold these impractical flights?

There is but one reason: persuasion-in-propaganda.  These solar stunts are mere propaganda to reinforce false beliefs in Gaia worshiping misanthropes.

It's not as if aviation is in its infancy. Engineers understand the mechanics of flight well. Engineers know already how much energy they need to achieve thrust and sustained powered flight.

Engineers can be on the ground trying to get solar output up to what is needed to haul 300 passengers of a conventional long-haul passenger flight. Engineers don't need these test flights.

The propagandists working for Solar Impulse claim they are "voyaging around the world without fuel or pollution." Likely, that is a huge lie.

So the manufacturing of the batteries happened without any pollution? So the construction of the airplane, built from special carbon fibers happened without any pollution? So the electric motors were manufactured without any pollution?

Read more ...

STING, LEONARDO DICAPRIO AND OTHER MASSIVE CARBON FOOTPRINT ENTERTAINMENT DINOSAURS LEAD THOUSANDS SUFFERING FROM DELUSIONS

Tens of thousands of Americans suffering from mind disorder gathered to parade in Manhattan, New York City, on Sunday, September 21, to agitate for political action against non-existent man-made global warming. Many have been so mentally disturbed by the specter of believed man-made global warming that they believe the earth shall be destroyed within one generation if politicians don't step in right now.

Leading the charge were human gasbags, Bill de Blasio, reigning mayor of New York City, Al Gore, the 2007 Nobel Prize winning non-scientist and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., one of the many privileged sons of the political dynasty.



Also helping to fuel the thousands suffering from mind disorder was actor jet-setting actor and environmentalist preacher Leonardo DiCaprio, who is known for his carbon-laden jaunts like his private jet trip to catch the opening match of the 2014 World Cup held in Brazil as well as his party up time aboard the 470-foot yacht Topaz, the fifth-biggest yacht on earth, owned by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates with a personal net worth estimated to be over $30 billion earned from you guessed it, oil.

Even that paragon of virtue, long-in-a-career-slump, Gordon from Newcastle, aka Sting, the King of Pain and rainforests, could be seen strolling along the streets of Manhattan along with thousands of climate crazies. Likely, Sting generates more pollution from one concert tour than 1,000 every day men and women do during their lifetimes. Someone should ask Sting how he likes flying among his houses in London and New York as well as his olive groves in Italy.

Back in 2013, results from the North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling (NEEM) project, managed by Denmark's Centre for Ice and Climate, showed that during the Eemian inter-glacial period, the climate in North Greenland was about 8°C (14°F) warmer than today. The Eemian inter-glacial period began about 130,000 years ago and ended about 115,000 years ago.

For the last few million years, ice age cycles have dominated climate of the earth. It is likely that planetary-scale and solar-system scale forces are at work driving those glacial ice age cycles as well as the inter-glacial periods of warming. Thus, it is likely such forces are causal in sea level rises and observed mean surface temps irrespective of the existence of humans.

In the last inter-glacial period, there might have been 70,000 humans alive versus the seven billion humans (7,064,345,235) alive today. Yet, evidence now says that seas were 13 to 26 feet higher than today and temperatures were much higher as well (7.8°C / 14°F).

So what remains is the thorny problem of explaining how pre-industrial mankind of much fewer in head count — billions upon billions fewer — caused much higher sea levels and much higher temperatures, that is, if man-made global warming as a theory is to be believed.

70,000 is 0.001% of a billion.

Today, the phrase climate change is politically-loaded. Many who say it mean this: CO2, a constituent component of air, an organic compound needed for life, should now legally get deemed as a pollutant and thus enable politicians to better control behavior of individuals, by force if necessary, and backed by the rhetoric of having a law.

No one ever doubts that pollution is a bad thing. Yet, those who label CO2 as pollution need their heads examined.

One of the biggest lies told in my lifetime is that CO2 is a pollutant. CO2 exists in your body. It's not a pollutant. CO2 is a constituent part of air. Without CO2, humans would die.

Certainly, CO2 isn't a pollutant. CO2 is what mammals breathe out -- you, me, your pet dog, your pet cat, the farmer's cows, cute fuzzy koalas in Australia, all of them. Persons confuse CO2 with CO, carbon monoxide, the pollutant that spews from automobile exhaust.

Everywhere you go, right now, air has the exact proportion of N, O and CO2 as it always does. Obviously, if the proportion of CO2 were to rise relative to N or O, humans would have hard times breathing. Evermore, the weight of evidence shows a strong disconnect between CO2 and extra heat. Something causes mean surface heat to rise and fall on the earth through time, but it isn't CO2.

Thus the belief that puny humans can somehow conjure more energy and put it forth around the earth and do so with greater effect than the sun seems all rather silly.

Global warming and global cooling are real. Who denies this? Yet, the earth is in a 4.6 BILLION year cooling trend. It was so hot 4.6 billion years ago that no life existed on earth.

Sol, our sun is sole source of energy for the earth, both directly from radiation and indirectly by causing the earth to move. All planet-scale heat on earth arises solely because of the sun.

As the sun is the sole driver of energy for the earth, scientists better need to learn how energy cycling of our sun has already caused global warming and what is the significance of what looks to be a 36-year oscillation of advancing and declining temperatures.

Those who claim mankind cause planet-scale heat do not get astrophysics at all nor do they get earth science including climate.

CO2 should get dismissed as causality for the source of heat on the earth because it's junk science. It's flat out wrong. Anyone who believes it has been duped, suckered.

The beef is that CO2 causes global warming — it doesn't — and that mankind are dumping extra amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere — that's irrelevant.

Mean surface heat as measured by temp has been falling for awhile. In March 2013, in most of the USA as well as all of Europe, mankind living there felt no correlation between CO2 and temperatures. Europeans experienced their coldest temps in 50 years on record CO2 output.

Year-to-year temperatures actually fell in the face of rising CO2. Thus, it is impossible, logically, for rising CO2 to be the cause, the driver for temperatures.

If big parts of the earth are cooling, even if other parts remain the same or rising, well, uniform rising isn't happening and thus nothing can get called rightly as global. Every year, we're seeing record CO2 output, but of late, we're seeing falling temps.

Is there any truth to the phrase climate change? The earth undergoes climate cycles — long stretches of glacial periods punctuated with inter-glacial warming. Yet to say that what is cyclical is change is little more than a stretch of truth.

If men mean, we're going to use a rhetorical story of man-made global warming to change people's beliefs in effort to control them through politics and bureaucracy then there might be truth to the phrase climate change.

If there is property involved, especially property taken from some so the property of others becomes worth more, if there are persuasion-in-propaganda campaigns to justify those takings — everyone should question it.  We're talking about mankind after all. We're not talking about cats and dogs and other animals that do not spend inordinate amounts of time deceiving in order to gain more buying power without honest exchange. Only those of mankind do that.

The most widespread system to classify climates the earth over is the  Köppen Climate Classification System devised by Wladimir Köppen, a German climatologist who divided climates based upon a general temperature profile related to latitude. In Köppen's system, there are six major climate regions — Tropical Moist, Dry, Moist Mid-latitude Mild Winters, Moist Mid-Latitude Cold Winters, Polar and Highland. Each major climate region has two or more subregions.

The climate of not one place on earth classified by the Köppen system has seen a change its classification. All places falling within polar five years ago, or 50 or 500 remain as regions with polar climates today. In short, there is no such thing as climate change.

If climate change is true, supporters of climate change must show where there a region has transformed from one climate to another. And then they would need to show how mankind is responsible for such a change, if such a change existed.

Pollution is a problem, always. Pollution reveals inefficiency in capital structures, inefficient capital structures protected by politicians and their laws.

More so, pollution damages property — right of ownership — of others. Thus, all should be ever vigilant against polluters and politicians who support polluters, politicians with their deceptive legislation, law and regulation.

If only mankind-hating, agenda-pushing environ / mental / ists would get out of the way as well as many who masquerade as academicians with Ph.D.s, perhaps we could get closer to truth about global warming and global cooling — so-called climate change.

Watch Robert F. Kennedy Jr. get interviewed by Michelle Fields of PJTV. The one-time heroin user who once was arrested for possessing 182 milligrams of heroin, and the nephew of former U.S. President John Kennedy rants about leftists' favorite bogey men, the Koch Brothers.

Here is Michelle Fields trying to get DiCaprio to answer to his critics over his giant carbon-footprint lifestyle.



Even Sting's doctors claimed he suffered from delusions. Ah Shadows in the Rain ...

Read more ...

PH DUH, A NEW ABC TV COMEDY

Scene 1 INT - FACULTY LOUNGE - EVENING

ACADEMIC LIVING ON THE PUBLIC DOLE #1

Evil consumers cause global warming!

FELLOW ACADEMICS
Hear! Hear!

ACADEMIC LIVING ON THE PUBLIC DOLE #2
Consumers. Mother earth wreckers. Let's stop 'em.

ACADEMIC LIVING ON THE PUBLIC DOLE #1
Let's get taxpayers to pay for a ship. We can live it up as if were on a cruise. We'll head to the Antarctic.

ACADEMIC LIVING ON THE PUBLIC DOLE #2
Right! And take pictures of melted ice, dying animals. Victory is ours!

ACADEMIC LIVING ON THE PUBLIC DOLE #3

Let's invite a journalist to party with us.

Scene 2 EXT - SHIP'S DECK - AFTERNOON

ACADEMICS (SHOUTING IN UNISON)
We're saved!

Read more ...

WHO WORRIES ABOUT THE FALSE CONCEPT OF CLIMATE CHANGE?

The left end of the graph reveals intense peer pressure and hyper indoctrination through public education, mostly mass media.

In spite of minor heat variances each year, climates the earth over have been steady for thousands of years. More so, there isn't one, monolithic climate, there are thousands upon thousands of climates. Thus there isn't any such thing as a global climate much less one that can "change".

Interestingly, of the countries whose peoples are most worried, the South Koreans and the Japanese have high elderly population. The elderly get scared easily. When told about anything that could threaten their taxpayers-funded welfare "pensions" and medicine, the elderly become quick to comply.

Until recently, Argentinans, Chileans, Filipinos, Ugandans, Bolivians and El Salvadorians have been subjugated by dictatorial types. The Lebanese who once could claim the Paris of the East now live in squalor. Even the Spaniards spent most of the 20th century under dictatorial rule, not having  democratic parliamentary elections until 1977. 

Not until you get to the Germans and the Canadians on that chart do you get peoples who have had democratic governments. Once you hit these peoples on the chart, the numbers show only slightly more than 50% believe the man-made global warming faux story. ?




Interestingly, it's land forms and their altitudes with respect to sea level along with proximity to big bodies of water that shape climate for any environment.

And of course, all of that is driven by the rotation of the earth as well as insolation, both of which are driven by the sun.

AGW is foolery. Manmade Global Warming is a spook story sold and told by immoral high priests of academia to garner popular support for deleterious political action that enriches some at the expense of many.

AGW alarmists claim that manmade CO2 causes heat as recording by rising surface temps.

Every month, a new record gets set for man-made CO2 output and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. SO, if CO2 were causal, that is, if CO2 causes temps to rise, and thus adds heat energy to the atmosphere, then whenever the next period of CO2 exceeds the previous period, temps must rise, ipso facto.

Yet, if in any period it is seen that CO2 has risen above a previous level and temperatures (measured heat) fall, then CO2 cannot be causal for heat. Lo and behold last spring, mankind witnessed RECORD CO2 and temps that fell to FIFTY YEAR LOWS.

Global means pervasive, everywhere found, the earth over. Yet, what happened in Europe disproves both the concept of global warming and the concept of CO2 as causal for heat.

As well, recent results from the North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling (NEEM) project, managed by Denmark’s Centre for Ice and Climate, show that during the Eemian inter-glacial, the climate in North Greenland was about 8°C (14°F) warmer than today. In that last inter-glacial period, there might have been 70,000 humans alive versus the seven billion humans (7,099,881,350) alive today. Yet, evidence now says that seas were 13 to 26 feet higher then than today and temperatures were much higher as well (7.8°C / 14°F).

So now comes the thorny problem of explaining how a pre-industrial mankind, an almost non-existent mankind of much fewer in head count — billions upon billions fewer — caused much higher sea levels and much higher temperatures, that is, if man-made CO2 global warming as a theory is to be believed.
Facts trump flawed computer models every day of the week, 365 days of the year, year after year after year into decades upon decades. The story of man-made CO2 causes global warming is a profoundly wrong story, a false story conjured by people with a vested interest and targeted against the most easily manipulated in effort to gain their political support.

It would be silly for someone to claim in all other inter-glacial times, one force caused global warming, but in this one, another force has caused global warming. Nowhere in the universe do we see exceptions in physics.

In this interglacial period, global warming began 11,400 years ago. At that time, mankind lived as hunter-gatherers, in nomadic groups. Population was only seven one-hundreths of what it is today.

If CO2 is causal in heat as man-made global warming alarmists claim, then what caused global warming in all of the other interglacial periods when mankind did not exist? Certainly, there must be one force, the same force that sets off all global warming during inter-glacial periods, whether or not mankind exists.

It seems a stretch to get anyone to believe that only several million hunter-gatherers, a scant seven one-hundredths of one percent of today’s overwhelming population of SEVEN BILLION could have generated enough CO2 to kick of a several thousands of years inter-glacial period.

Whatever this force is, this force governs both the intensity and the duration of the inter-glacial period. Since this force has operated in the absence of mankind, no one of sound mind can believe mankind is the creator of this force.

Already, we have seen the coldest spring in FIFTY YEARS in the face of RECORD CO2 output. Thus, it is clear that CO2 cannot be causal for surface heat and thus elevated temperatures during global warming. In short, there isn’t any such thing as man-made global warming. There is global warming, but mankind has nothing to do with its creation, intensity or duration.

This interglacial period isn’t even as warm as the last one, and the seas are far lower. Yet, there is a record number of mankind living on earth (nearly 7.1 billion) creating record CO2 output every month.

The idea of man-made global warming, from where did it come? The idea did not originate in most anyone.

It was told to most and because most have been conditioned already to accept ideas without resistance, so too did most readily accept the false concept of man-made global warming.

Even right now, most fail to realize that they are the owners of themselves, that each one of them are living their one and only lives, owing nothing to anyone.

Others who have realized this long ago, want all the luxuries available without having to work and thus exchange for those luxuries honestly. Instead, they want others to do the work from which they can reap the rewards.

So, they focus on gaining power, by force, if necessary. Their preferred method is rhetorical trickery. It's cheaper and more effective, with fewer people needed to be given a cut of the bounty.

Once having gained power, those with power focus on creating voluntary compliance rules, unseen chains of voluntarily servitude. Oh so quickly do the easily tricked shackle themselves with these rules, readily complying because of inculcated false beliefs.

The purpose of these rules is to get others to work on behalf of these rhetorical masters now holding power, which transfers earned buying power to them. Once that transfer happens, readily they live the life of luxury without having to put themselves at-risk, exposed to the vagaries of market competition, which through technological innovation, could render obsolete their capital structures within days.

Read more ...

CLUB SODA, THAT EFFERVESCENT BUBBLY

Read more ...