GETTING UPPITY OVER A SLOGAN. BLACK LIVES MATTER IS RACISM. IF ONLY BLM PROTESTERS SPOKE WITH ADVERBS.

Organizers and followers of a black racist movement coined a slogan to identify themselves — Black Lives Matter. By shoving their slogan in the faces of Americans everywhere, they have triggered many Americans to counter with their own slogans such as All Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter, the latter which supports the police.

The problem comes down to English. Had only the organizers said any of these, they might have attracted much support from most Americans:

• Black lives matter too. 
• Black lives matter as well.
• Black lives matter also.
• Black lives matter likewise.
• Black lives matter similarly.

Omission of that little adverb makes all the difference.

In MOOKIE SPIKE LEE NEVER CAN DO THE RIGHT THING. THE EVIL STUPIDITY OF BLACKISM AND THE POLITICS BLACKS NEED MOST. #BLACKSSORACIST, I showed you the horrible doctrine of blackism. The organizers of Black Lives Matter are using the standard tactic of all social justice warriors in the USA to support their blackism. In AHAB MOBY DICK RACISM. WHAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT IS ALL ABOUT — HUNTING THE GREAT WHITE MALE, I revealed the rhetorical tactic of all of these racists.

True racism means living by preventing another from trading property for property through law or through collusion because of another's race — being one of people of common descent. Adherents of racism organize into groups based on arbitrary characteristics such as skin color (blacks), other-than English language spoken (Hispanics/Latinos), sexual preferences (gays) or sex (feminists) and then seek superior rights to gain property (right of ownership).
Racists have groups like the NAACP, La Raza, Act Up! and NOW.

Americans of European descent (see: HEART OF EUROPE? ARE GREEKS EVEN EUROPEAN?), so-called "whites" aren't organized into any group. There is no group of whites who live through law or through collusion by preventing others from trading property for property.

In Everett Dean Martin's work Behavior of Crowds, which the hate group the Southern Poverty Law Center adapted for their 1920 pamphlet, The Mob Mind vs Civil Liberty, Martin described factions known as struggle groups.

The Black Lives Matter faction is yet another racist struggle group in the USA fighting in the perpetual civil war of the USA. War always comes down to gaining property in the possessions of others whether through guns and bullets or through politics.

Read more ...

MOOKIE SPIKE LEE NEVER CAN DO THE RIGHT THING. THE EVIL STUPIDITY OF BLACKISM AND THE POLITICS BLACKS NEED MOST. #BLACKSSORACIST

Recently, black entertainers have taken to the Internet and television to decry the awards given to those who produce motion pictures. Their rallying cry is an Internet hashtag, #Oscarssowhite.



What is the flip side to #Oscarssowhite? Why does a guy like Spike Lee care so much about getting rewards from whites? It is as if Spike Lee seeks praise from whites as a means to self-validation.

"Look, look massah. I done good. I done made this here picture show jes like you good white folk do. So hows bouts gimme me ones youse statues? Please massah, please."

Guys like Spike Lee simply lack intellects needed for deep contemplation on such matters. Worse, hobbled by inferior intellects, guys like Spike Lee engage in little more than blackism.

Would Spike Lee prefer blaxsploitation type dialogue and roles in movies? Would the rest of us?

If Spike Lee cared about his people, Spike Lee would only tell black stories with full black casts, made by all-black crews and only shown in Magic Johnson theaters.

Now, because of #Oscarssowhite, who can believe if Denzel Washington really won or he was given an Affirmative Action Oscar? Were the Oscars of Jamie Foxx, Forest Whitaker, Halle Berry, Jennifer Hudson, Mo'Nique, Octavia Spencer  and  Lupita Nyong'o merely Affirmative Action Oscars? Suspiciously, all of them supposedly won theirs during the 2000s. 

Did Steven Rodney McQueen and John Ridley win their Affirmative Action Oscars for Best Picture and Adapted Screenplay for 12 Years a Slave merely because a slavery themed movie would automatically win in the same way an AIDS movie or gay movie would win (Dallas Buyers Club, Philadelphia, Milk)? 

No longer can I believe that any Oscar won in the 2000s by Americans with swarthy skin are legitimate wins. Because of #oscarssowhite, I can only believe those Oscars were Affirmative Action gifts.

Did Steven Rodney McQueen and John Ridley win their Affirmative Action Oscars for Best Picture and Adapted Screenplay for 12 Years a Slave merely because a slavery themed movie would automatically win in the same way an AIDS movie or gay movie would win (Dallas Buyers Club, Philadelphia, Milk)? 

No longer can I believe that any Oscar won in the 2000s by Americans with swarthy skin are legitimate wins. Because of #oscarssowhite, I can only believe those Oscars were Affirmative Action gifts.

Blackism is a horrible doctrine. Until Americans see themselves as full-fledged citizens and individuals first, nothing with change for them.

Indian Reservations have been a bad deal for tribal Americans. Ben Franklin wanted to admit tribal Americans into the union as co-equal states. Yet look how it turned out for them.

Anyone who is a slave-descendant American need only look to tribal Americans to see the error in segregation of any kind, whether by treaty, force or self-imposed. Blackism is self-imposed segregation forged under mythical sub-cultural bonds that don't exist.

Slave-descendant Americans need to awaken to their individualism and reject blackism. Blackism that has arisen from the civil rights movement has been a hex upon slave-descendant Americans. Its latest iteration — #blacklivesmatter, space spaces — only is driving slave-descendant Americans further into a trap from which they won't escape.

Blackism is the chief cause of poverty among blacks in the USA. Poverty isn't caused by a lack of cash. It's caused by a lack of trust of your fellow man, the kind of trust you need to foster economic growth thru credit.

The only way blacks are ever going to be given the skills, the mindset needed to escape poverty is if the black subculture gets eradicated in the USA. Instead, its been encouraged to flourish since the 1960s. Since the 1960s, so-called blacks have put themselves on the path of American Indian. They have isolated themselves. They continue to attack the mass of individuals, wrongly labeling each of us as racist.

Until blacks ditch their subculture / counterculture and embrace individualism, they will continue to struggle. It's impossible to be in society — free association — with all who seek that when some organize into a group, a cult — in this case blackhood — in an exclusionary manner.

And to this day, it is shame to Congress for flooding the USA with Mexicans and illegal Mexicans and other illegals from Central America without taking care of our first nations people.

Slave-descendant Americans need to reject blackism and embrace the surest path to raising themselves up — a deportation of all illegal aliens, a moratorium on all legal immigration not for months, but perhaps years, and cancellation of all works visas in the USA.

Illegal immigration and excessive legal immigration has only undermined the livelihoods of Americans who claim to be black.

True racism is the doctrine of those who organize into a group based on an arbitrary characteristic such as skin color (blacks), other-than English language spoken (Hispanics/Latinos), sexual preferences (gays) or sex (feminists) and then who seek superior rights. 

Racism is civil war by other means. Racists seek to acquire the property (right of ownership) by force as all do who engage in war. True racists strive to prevent those they oppose from trading property for property either through law or through collusion because of race — being one of people of common descent.

Racism will end when racists ditch their respective racist groups — blacks, Hispanics, gays, feminists — and when individuals pressure politicians as law givers to stop giving extra rights to those who become part of these racist groups.

Watch the best "black" actor ever, Kirk Lazarus.

Read more ...

AHAB MOBY DICK RACISM. WHAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT IS ALL ABOUT — HUNTING THE GREAT WHITE MALE.

The Great White Male is the great white whale, the Moby Dick for all racists and feminists. They're all Captain Ahabs.

Their template is the same:

• [Group X] is a worthy cultural contributor.
• [Group X] has a history of oppression.
• Through their economic and political dominance, white males have been the oppressors of [Group X].
• Therefore, [Group X] needs reparations.
• And White Males need to be stripped of economic power and political power.

You can put any name for Group X — blacks, chicanos, women, homosexual men, homosexual women — and the argument always works.

I devised that template from extrapolating what I saw bleeding into the Internet back in 1996 from 20-somethings who were fresh from hearing preaching and sermons from their university professors. That template works for Afro-American Studies, Latino Studies, Women's Studies, LGBT Studies, Asian-American Studies, you name it.

That should go to you show you that such academic programs and departments are little more than political agencies of leftist Marxism masquerading as higher education.

Every group you can imagine more than for themselves is against one group — white males, straight white males, mostly.

• NAACP are against white males more than for themselves. 
• NOW are against white males more than for themselves. 
• La Raza are against white males more than for themselves. 

Even white females are against white males. They know they can breed with males of any race. They too see the great white male as their Moby Dick.

Social justice warriors are leftists who leverage feminism, blackism, Hispanicism, homosexism (political homosexuality). Their goal is to eradicate heterosexual white males. Their chief strategy is to label their anointed adversary — white males — as racists. One of their many tactics is to stifle any dissent by saying any speech that questions their motives or agenda is politically incorrect “hate speech.”

Another tactic is to claim white males derive privilege merely from being white and male. That is why they say "Check your privilege." 

And thus, they rely upon the template to claim white males perpetrated social injustice against themselves or those alike to them in the past. They try to appeal to the innate sense of fairness — its fair to divide a pie equally among everyone — to agitate for what they claim is social justice. Social justice takes typical get expressed as reparation or quotas, in short, anything that advances themselves at the expense of others most of whom are white males.

Quite often, their arguments rely upon the fallacy of consensus gentium. Mostly, they leverage peer pressure, particularly the fear of being outcast from the group for not accepting the group ethos.

As I showed you in THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS THE MOST DANGEROUS HATE GROUP IN THE USA TODAY. KEEP YOUR DAUGHTERS AWAY FROM THEM., Social Justice Warriors use the same method used by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Everett Dean Martin knew all about the machination of evil groups way back in 1920 as he reveals in his work Behavior of Crowds.




As stated above, their goal is to rid themselves of white guys. Yet, only dead white guys and specifically, dead Protestant Christian white guys founded and created the United States of America. No other persons did. Women didn't. Blacks didn't. Hispanics didn't.

King James authorized all of the colonization of America. King James was a white guy and now is a dead white. King James was a Church of Scotland, Church of England Christian Protestant guy. United States history is really a combined history of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, colonial America and the United States itself. And it's almost exclusively a history of dead white guys, almost all of whom were Protestant Christians.

CHRISTIANS FOUNDED AMERICA, NOT ATHEISTS, NOR JEWS, NOR HINDUS, NOR BUDDHISTS, NOR MUSLIMS.


The dead Protestant white guys of the British Enlightenment were the ones who promoted freedom and individualism.

Everywhere the earth over and for all time, all colored people have promoted tribalism and servitude. There isn't a country on earth today or in the past dominated by colored people who devised the concepts of freedom and individualism that whites did during the era of the British Enlightenment.

In every country on earth occupied by a majority of colored people, if they have anything at all, they have come by it exclusively through white men primarily white men of North Sea Germanic ancestry. The de facto language of commerce, politics and science is the white man's English. All thoughts thought in English are white thoughts and white concepts. The de facto rules of commerce were devised by whites.

It's not coincidence that almost all migration goes from lands of color people with sovereignty to lands of whites with sovereignty.

The basis of an authentic America and thus an authentic cradle-to-grave life for all Americans still ought to be meritocracy — rewards go to those with superior intellects, skills, characters.

If anyone hates that, he or she should hate his parents and his ancestry for their inferior DNA.

Historical realism trumps any fool's charge of white supremacist every time.

Read more ...

HAUNTED BY WHITE DEVILS, PHILOSOPHY PROFESSOR GEORGE D. YANCY SHARES HIS BLACK STRUGGLES WITH RHETORIC AND REALITY

Jeremy Egerer at the American Thinker wrote a critique of an essay titled Dear White America, published by the New York Times and written by an academician, George D. Yancy,  who works as philosophy professor at Emory University.



Yancy's essay is little more than a mindless exercise that fails at persuasion in propaganda precisely because Yancy tries to lecture and scold readers whose ancestry might be Caucasian Western Europeans. It seems so odd that a college professor in the field of philosophy would not have learned from Aristotle's Rhetoric and Cicero's De Inventione before trying his own hand at persuasion.

One of Yancy's pseudo-intellectual gems found in his lame essay is this:

"If you are white, and you are reading this letter, I ask that you don’t run to seek shelter from your own racism. Don’t hide from your responsibility."

Yancy assumes far too much and he doesn't understand racism at all. If you are not denying to trade with anyone based on his ethnicity in purchases and sales of property (right of ownership) for property, you are not living by racism. To be racist, you would need to stop "blacks" from entering into contracts for work, for housing, for eating and so forth.

Elsewhere, Yancy writes, "accept all of the truth about what it means for you to be white in a society that was created for you." As Yancy reveals he does not know what racism means, so too does Yancy reveal that he does not know what society means.

Society means a friendly association among some who engage in voluntary interaction. Society consists of strangers who engage in trade of property. A society of property is the only kind of society that can arise among strangers, each who pursue self-interested goals. Society exists independently from government.

No one can create society for you. You must create society with others. Those who came before you did so and those who come after you who want society must do the same.

Until blacks ditch their subculture / counterculture and embrace individualism, they will continue to struggle. It is impossible to be in society — free association — with all who seek that when some organize into a group, a cult — in this case blackhood — in an exclusionary manner.

Racism is a horrible political doctrine instituted by lawgivers. As long as lawgivers grant rights to some based on their status and impose duty upon others because of that status, liberty is lessened for all all. Congress engages in discrimination through laws that establish agencies to support all kinds of racism — subsidy for EOP education, preferential treatment for skin-colored minority-owned businesses and so forth.

Racism devalues every individual and turns persons into monsters as they join groups. All other ways to talk of racism is done the racists themselves to mask their own agendas.

Since the 1960s, so-called blacks have put themselves on the path of American Indian. They have isolated themselves. They continue to attack the mass of individuals, wrongly labeling each of us as racist.

Racism will end when racists ditch their respective racist groups — blacks, Hispanics, gays, feminists — and when individuals pressure politicians as law givers to stop giving extra rights to those who become part of these racist groups.

Before Yancy attempts to lecture, Yancy should demonstrate to the world that he did not receive admission to any of his academic programs based on skin-color quotas. After all, all laws on the books of Congress that promote anyone deemed a member of a designated race at the expense of all others is racism expressed legally.

What all should want to know if Yancy as a talking shop academic has real job skills. Can Yancy rap? Can Yancy breakdance? Can Yancy sling drugs? Can Yancy pimp?

Read more ...

AMERICANS STILL LIVE BY HYPHENATED IGNORANCE DURING THE 21ST CENTURY. WHO SHOULD EXPECT PREJUDICE AS WELL AS RACISM TO END THEN?

Of late, I have looked up more than a few biographical entries in Wikipedia in support of musicians to whom I have listened from YouTube. In entry after entry, I've come across the rather loathly expression, African-Americans.

All should be offended that many Americans foolishly still call some Americans by the highly inaccurate and insulting name, African-Americans.

Importation of slaves was decreed illegal effective January 1, 1808. By 1840, almost all slaves living north of the Ohio River had been freed. All born in the USA were Americans and not foreigners deserving of a hyphened moniker.

We're living in the 21st century. It shocks that in the 21st century, many still refer to some Americans as hyphenated Americans. Doing so implies a lesser status rendering all those hyphenated as being less than full Americans.

Is it any wonder that many grow up with prejudice? Americans are being taught to view millions of individuals as inferior, as if they need protection like spotted owls and other dying species.

As I showed you in TRAGEDY EXPLOITERS WRONGLY CALL THE MENTALLY-ILL DRIVEN SOUTH CAROLINA SHOOTING AN ACT OF TERRORISM. OTHER TWISTED ONES CALL FOR A BAN AGAINST INDIVIDUALS OWNING GUNS, the biggest promoters of racism in exchange for power are politicians. Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns anyone into monsters as they join groups.

Read more ...

TRAGEDY EXPLOITERS WRONGLY CALL THE MENTALLY-ILL DRIVEN SOUTH CAROLINA SHOOTING AN ACT OF TERRORISM. OTHER TWISTED ONES CALL FOR A BAN AGAINST INDIVIDUALS OWNING GUNS.

So in the aftermath of the shooting at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church  in Charleston, South Carolina, in which nine Americans were killed, many opportunists of mainstream media have wasted no time to exploit the event for political purposes. While most have called for gun bans in violation of the United States Constitution, many have done something far worse.

Stupidly, many are calling the criminal act an act of terrorism. Sadly, the president of the National Association of Colored People, Cornell William Brooks, in a thoughtless, reactionary manner said the incident is "an act of racial terrorism."

To believe Dylann Roof is a terrorist and to remain logically consistent, one must believe Adam Lanza was terrorist. One must believe James Holmes is a terrorist.

An ill-in-mind shooter who kills more than one during one incident isn't a terrorist. Those who claim this shooting as terrorism have engaged in rhetoric of the worst kind.

Terrorism means living by killing civilians in efforts to get civilians to pressure law givers into changing their policy or to get civilians to rise up and overthrow their law givers.

How is killing some Americans who happen to be black going to get blacks to rise up against law givers and force them to change their polices toward blacks?

Here are notable, actual terrorist attacks:

• The Palestine Liberation Organization Muslims who murdered Israeli athletes at the 1972 Summer Games in Munich were terrorists.
• The 1995 Tokyo Subway sarin gas attacks that killed 12 Japanese done by Aum Shinrikyo were terrorists.
• The 9/11 (2001) Al-Qaeda Muslim Saudi Arabian and Egyptian hijackers who murdered over 3,000 Americans were terrorists.

For any act to be racist, such an act would need to stop anyone from a claimed group from obtaining work or entering into contracts. That is the correct definition of racism. All other ways to talk of racism is done by racists themselves to mask their own agendas.

The biggest promoters of racism in exchange for power are politicians. Racism is a political doctrine. Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns anyone into monsters as they join groups.

Jim Crow laws were the misdeeds of racist law givers. The Dred Scott vs Sanford (1856) decision by U.S. Supreme Court robes was the misdeed of racist judges. Pace v. Alabama (1883) was yet another racist decision by the U.S. Supreme Court judges as was Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).

Foolishly, many Americans revere U.S. Supreme court judges as demigods.

U.S. Supreme Court legal "scholars" universally hated Asians in the 20th century. In five major racist rulings, the revered Supreme Court robes ruled against the individualism of Americans who had Chinese or Japanese ancestry — Ozawa v. United States (1922), Korematsu v. United States (1944), Lum v. Rice (1927), Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), Korematsu v. United States (1944).

Law givers of Americans, especially those of the U.S. Congress are the chief instigators of racism in America. Congress engages in discrimination through laws that establish agencies to support all kinds of racism — subsidy for women-only businesses, education subsidy for so-called minorities, and so forth.

The biggest racists in America today are those organized groups such as the NAACP, NOW, Act Up!, and La Raza, each of which push for privileged privileges like quotas and subsidies.

Racism results in doling political privilege to those in favored groups at the expense of defenseless individuals who fail to belong to any organized group.  If any individual dare speak up about the duty being imposed upon him so political privileges as rights can get conferred to those of favored groups, that individual gets labeled as a racist by those winning the privileges.

Why does anyone seek political privilege? That is the real problem.

It is sad but predictable that those of mankind with political agendas go to great lengths through political theater to deceive the gullible and convince the gullible of all manners of things.

Every individual has the capacity of living by the Law of Love — do to others and loving one's neighbor as you would want others to love you.

Yet when anyone joins a group, the law of that governs the lesser reigns — the Law of Survival. The individual strives to survive as a member of the group by demonstrating to others his or her adherence to the ethos — idealized member. Individuals who join groups lose themselves and becoming cogs of the group, one of the mob, the crowd, who do wicked misdeeds in the name of advancing the group. The leaders who derive much power from others who give up their individual powers strive to keep the group going for their obvious benefit.

Yet when anyone joins a group, the law of that governs the lesser reigns — the Law of Survival. The individual strives to survive as a member of the group by demonstrating to others his or her adherence to the ethos — idealized member. The leaders who derive much power from others who give up their individual powers strive to keep the group going for their obvious benefit.

Everywhere you go, you can find the ultimate group, one based on territory and forced membership. It is to this group that all other groups appeal for support and protection. This ultimate group is forged by law givers, of course.

Since the recorded history of mankind, there has been no greater force of evil the earth other than that of law givers. The men and women of governments — politicians and bureaucrats — are the true mass murderers and manipulators of minds as they dole out crumbs of welfare in exchange for power.

The belief that mankind can get along as long as mankind continue to align themselves into groups stems from a childish rationalism and a grotesque idealism.

Such belief is false, thoroughly. People as group members do anything to push the survival of their respective groups. 

As far as the ban-the-guns angle many tragedy exploiters have taken, I have shown you in KILLERS IN AMERICA WORK SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, over half of all gun deaths are suicides.

According to the CDC, based on 2010 data, more people die from alcoholic liver disease (15,990) than from homicide by guns (11,078). Almost as many die from intestinal infections not classified every year (10,276) as by gun homicide!

Gun deaths that are not suicides account for not even 1% of population nor one-tenth of one percent nor one-hundredth of 1% of population. Gun deaths that are not suicides account for a scant three one-thousandths of one percent of population.

According to the CDC, based on 2010 data, more people die from alcoholic liver disease (15,990) than from homicide by guns (11,078). Almost as many die from intestinal infections not classified every year (10,276) as by gun homicide!

Total gun deaths in 2010 were 30,470, a number that has been falling for years in the face of a growing population. Of those there were a total 19,392 gun suicides. Suicides are 63.4% of all gun deaths!

Homicides by guns account for 0.0035056962% of the whole population and a tiny 0.44% of all deaths!

These numbers are so small relative to total deaths and total population as to be rounding errors. Death by homicide by gun is statistically insignificant in the face of all deaths.

The real killers are heart disease and cancer, which together account for more than half of all deaths (54.9%).

The biggest killer of them all are women who engage in abortion. At 765,651 killed by abortion, by far, abortion was the leading cause of death in the USA in 2010, besting cardiovascular diseases not counting heart stoppage (600,385), cancers (574,743), heart stoppage (179,828), and all accidents (120,859).

Almost every of the 780,213 deaths caused by cardiovascular disease and almost every of the 574,743 deaths caused by cancer and almost every of the 138,080 deaths caused by lower respiratory disease never gets reported on your local six o'clock news. And no one in mainstream media talks about the monthly abortion body count.

Read more ...

DOES GOOGLING ON NIGGA MAKE YOU RACIST OR MERELY GANGSTA?

So yesterday, the Washington Post editors published a work by Christopher Ingraham clearly trying to capitalize on the Baltimore riots in effort to sell advertising at higher ad rates. In the work, Ingraham parrots a bogus study that claims racism can be measured by how many search on the word nigger through Google. Ingraham wades into the deep-end of stupidity by calling the research method a "makes-tons-of-sense-when-you-think-about-it method."

Merely searching for the word nigger doesn't make anyone racist. What if someone is black and searches google with the keyword nigger? What if someone is black and searches on the variant word nigga because that is a word often spoken among blacks. Both results would be tallied in the data that constitutes that phony graphic and phony story.

Interestingly, a map published with the work reveals that areas designated more than average and much more than average roughly correspond to where most blacks live in the USA. In short, the methodology of the researcher likely is flawed, horribly so.

Likely, the only objective measure of racism would be this:

the ratio of job applications rejected by private employers of those applicants of different races to the respective employer's race expressed as a percent.

Unless someone is being deprived, economically that is, if someone is being prevented from earning a living, then racism isn't happening.

If you hate Caucasians and you are negroid or mongoloid, that doesn't make you racist, merely stupid. If you collude with others to stop those Caucasians from trading property in pursuit of profit, then and only then are you living by racism.

And the same holds true for anyone who perceives himself to be part of one race and deprives those from other races from trading their property, that is, their rights of ownership, in pursuit of profit.

Read more ...

#FOOLISH STARBUCKS CEO RACE BAITS IN A DESPERATE TRY TO MAKE STARBUCKS HIP TO SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS

Hubris. It's gets the best of many. In a stunning marketing gaff perhaps on par with Coca-cola's ill-fated New Coke blunder, CEO Howard Schultz of Starbucks has forgotten that he is in the brewed coffee-to-go business.

The demographic reality of Americans contradicts foolish men like Howard Shultz. According to a work built on U.S. Census Bureau data and published by the Pew Center, in 2010, 15% of all new marriages happened between spouses of a different race or ethnicity from one another, which is more than double the 1980 figure (6.7%). In 2010, the share of intermarriages reached an all-time high of 8.4%. Compare that to 3.2% in 1980.  

In 1960, white-black marriages amounted to only 1.7% of all black same-race marriages, but in 2010, such marriages amounted to 12%. Telling, in 2010, almost one of every four black men married someone who wasn't black. If that doesn't signal black acceptance by others, what does?

More than four-in-ten Americans (43%) believe inter-racial marriage is beneficial for all Americans. Nearly two-thirds of Americans (63%) are good with anyone in their family marrying outside their race or ethnicity. As it is, more than one-third of Americans (35%) say that someone of their family has married someone of another race. 

If Shultz walked his foolish talk, he would strive to reduce the price of a cup of coffee he is willing to accept by becoming more efficient. Also, if Shultz were to become a man of action instead of a man of blather, Shultz would focus on opening all new Starbucks stores primarily in minority-concentrated neighborhoods.

At day's end, corporate America needs to get out of the public opinion making business. It's quite a lowly tactic of style over substance when firms must rely on pandering to Social Justice Warriors in effort to win sales. 

The last time I checked, the two-term president of the United States and leader of the free world, Barack Obama, had a black dad and a white mom. Racism died years ago. The only ones desperate to keep racism alive are poverty pimps, politicians and hubris-suffering CEOs.

Read more ...

JOE BIDEN, MAN OF A THOUSAND GAFFS ATTACKED FOR SAYING SHYLOCK

Joe Biden, the guy who happens to be vice-president of the USA has done it again. During yet another blah-blah Biden speech, Biden referred to mortgage brokers as Shylocks.

In so doing, Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League offensively stepped forward to claim that a character created from the brilliant mind of William Shakespeare was little more than a "medieval stereotype about Jews" Idiotically, Foxman then rendered his ignorant literary opinion, in effect saying Shakespeare had gotten it so wrong supposedly since Shylock remains an offensive characterization to this day.



In The Merchant of Venice, the story agent Shylock is a Venetian moneylender who happens to be a Jew. Shylock stands as the baddie against Antonio.

Shylock happens lends money to Antonio, who happens to be a Catholic. As condition of the loan, Shylock requires Antonio to pledge a pound of flesh from his body. When Antonio fails to pay Shylock, Shylock famously demands his "pound of flesh."

During the story, Shylock's daughter, Jessica, falls in love with Lorenzo, a friend of Antonio. For her love, she renounces her Hebraism and becomes a Catholic.

The climax of The Merchant of Venice has Shylock stripped of his property, legally, and has him forced to become a Catholic.

Likely, Jewish racists who belong to groups promoting their race do not like the story of a defeated Shylock, precisely because they see Shylock as a Jew and not as a greedy, selfish man.

Here is Al Pacino playing Shylock.  In the scene, after Jessica has taken off with her Catholic lover, Shylock retorts to his taunters who ask if Shylock intends to get his pound of flesh from Antonio. Shakespeare used the scene to reveal Catholic hypocrisy about Jews.




To watch many Joe Biden gaff videos, check out YouTube.

Read more ...

FEMINISM IS RACISM

Julie Borowski has produced a series of YouTube videos whereby she reveals various indoctrinated, collectivist beliefs contrasted against individualism.

Julie gestures great faces. Enjoy her message!

Read more ...

IT'S BECAUSE I AM BLACK, ISN'T IT?

Obama's entire political career is predicated on him being black.

First, he won office in Illinois from a district of black voters who only put blacks into office. Next, he lost a race for the U.S. House of Reps against a black man in a district that only votes for blacks. After that, Obama won his race for the U.S. Senate against, you guessed it, a black man.

Without the foregoing, Obama never could have ran seriously for the presidency of the U.S.

Obama is president precisely because he is black and no other reason, except the money of backers who funded him against a crazy, war-mongering, wrinkly old white guy and his side-kick milf for whom every married guy had the hots that women, the majority of voters were angry about.

Had Obama been white, running in a district that puts into office, anyone, regardless of skin color, few would have taken his craziness seriously and thus, his political career never would have taken off.

And for those who shall cry racist

Men can first attest the word racism to 1932, attributable to use by NAZIs, modeled on the words racialism used in context of South African law, first appearing in 1871.

Racism requires the use of law to inhibit or advance any group that organizes itself along biological lines. Racism is a horrible political doctrine. It devalues every individual and turns persons into monsters as they join groups.

The biggest racists in America today are those organized groups such as the NAACP, NOW, Act Up!, and La Raza, each pushing for privileged spoils from income taxation, privileges like quotas and subsidies.

The biggest promoters of racism in exchange for power are politicians. Racism is a political doctrine. Racism is not bigotry. Bigotry is an anthropological phenomenon. 

A racist act would be organized blacks pushing to get an easing of SAT scores to gain admission into law school. A racist act would be forcing persons to pay taxes and earmarking those taxes to subsidize the hiring of women after an organized group of women have lobbied successfully for such legislation.

Read more ...

SMARMY OBAMA AND HIS GIANT FAIL THAT IS OBAMACARE

Like most ill in mind narcissists, Obama can't let go that everyone can see he lies. So he doubles down with more lies. 

To his credit, Obama is quite the salesman. Likely, though, people are afraid to question Obama for fear of being labelled as racist.

Here is smarmy Obama lying his ass off.

And here is smarmy Obama lying his ass off, again.

Enjoy these articles on Obama and his Obamacare fail.

President Obama Covers Up an Old Lie With a New One - Hit & Run : Reason.com

Obama Relies on False Hope to Sell Obamacare - Reason.com

Obama-don't-care - Reason.com
3 Big Differences - and 1 Awful Similarity - Between 

Obamacare and Medicare Part D - Hit & Run : Reason.com

Read more ...

RACISTS ALWAYS RACE AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP. IT'S AS CLEAR AS BLACK AND WHITE.

On August 14, 2013, the WSJ  published a story about the findings of National Bureau of Economic Research economists Ross Levine and Yona Rubinstein about which teens grow up to be successful entrepreneurs in Troubled Teens Make More Successful Entrepreneurs.

Today, August 16th, The Atlantic published their racist slant on the same study, see: Entrepreneurship: The Ultimate White Privilege? penned by a racist-baiting Jordan Weissman in which Weissman claims the faux concept of "white privilege" is the reason why.

"White privilege" is yet another in a long line of rhetorical ploys employed by these racists. Their Ahab story never changes. 

Their Ahab stories using this template:

[insert group] exists, has a rich history and has been discriminated against by the great white male, their Moby Dick.

Levine says, “But it’s a unique combination of breaking rules and being smart that helps you become an entrepreneur...Of course, you have to be smart.” Levine also says, "...more likely to come from high-earning, two-parent families than other employment types."

Are there many two-parent families in the ghettos among minorities? What does the IQ distribution look like for male minorities? Where does the tail skew, toward the left or toward the right? What does the IQ distribution look like for females? Does it cluster around the mean with few outliers with shallow left and right tails?

Look at the characteristics here: white, male, and highly educated. All coincide with likely higher IQs.

Levine and Rubinstein argue that self-employed workers who incorporate their businesses more or less are more serious about succeeding than those who haven’t incorporated their businesses. They argue that incorporation coincides with legitimizing one's entrepreneurial venture. It seems that smarter white males, smarter presumably because of higher IQs, mature into wanting to play by the culture — the codified laws and codes of conduct.

Rules-breaking is learned behavior. Over the years, millions of poor, ghetto illegal entrepreneurs — drug dealers, pimps, extortion enforcers — have learned to break the rules. Yet, because never do they pursue legit business and because their kind of business falls under the scrutiny of another kind of regulator — cops, courts and jailers — success outcomes are quite different. 

Levine's claimed conclusion is not accurate. Likely it is a combo of being smart and having a propensity to risk, which in youthful days reveals itself as rules-breaking, but in adult days, as betting on one's own ideas, which tells the story.

Read more ...