RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH! IT'S ONE OF THE BIGGEST FAILINGS OF AMERICANS AND REVEALS INTENSE IMMATURITY

Recently, an adrenaline-driven school "cop", likely one lacking an intellect suitable to make life-or-death decisions and who couldn't control his urges, put the beat down on a waif of a high school girl (see video below). All should be reminded that adolescents are still rather immature children whose don't get much activation in their pre-frontal cortex part of their brains.

What the video shows is how Americans have lost their moral compasses.  And here is the chief cause that has given rise to this ugly scene and countless others like it:

You will respect my authority.

School officials and unionized public educators want to impose their authority by force against children. And once the cop entered the scene, he wanted his authority respected as well. Unlike school officials, hiding behind the protection of law written for cops, the mindless cop was quick to resort to violence.

The teacher could have shown maturity. Rather than give into the supposed unruly student, the teacher could have invited the other students to go for a walk. The teacher could have told the unruly student that when the student would gain the desire to be kind to her classmates she would be welcomed to rejoin the group who would be waiting with open arms.

A CNN report claimed the incident arose because the student refused to stop playing with her cell phone. Why do children have cell phones in school? Why do children have any leeway in schools? Why isn't school life highly structured, down the minute so that children have little time to think upon anything except lessons? Why aren't school designers leveraging forces like peer pressure to keep students focused on school rather than teen social life?


So what happened to Americans which has led to life being lived by you will respect my authority?

Americans can vote, but Americans don't have a representative democracy. 

In THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE, I revealed to you in pictures, that Americans began to lose representative democracy since 1870. Today, your House member could give you and every adult in your district about 14 seconds and have no time to fly to Washington, D.C., to schmooze with other reps.

And this hold true at the state level. Subsequently, over the years, unions that represent police have colluded with law givers of their respective states to write laws, which in effect, absolve any policeman of any violent action undertaken against any American simply by claiming this: I feared for my life.

American institutions likely have hit a low, perhaps an all-time low. Today's institutions are being run by politics and those of middling intellects.

Everything Americans have been doing have been near all-time lows. Entertainment is so bad that lip syncing is acceptable and the major source of movies are weak comic book stories from the 1960s.

Enjoy this Cartman mash-up from South Park.

Read more ...

WAKE UP NEW ZEALANDERS. YOU ARE LIVING UNDER AN ELECTORAL DICTATORSHIP AND YOUR MIXED-MEMBER PROPORTIONAL ELECTORAL SYSTEM ONLY MADE IT WORSE.

In previous works, I showed you that long ago, Americans, Canadians and Australians lived under representative democracies. Today and for awhile now, Americans, Canadians and Australians live under electoral dictatorships.

For each of their stories, check out these:

• THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE
• CANADIANS VOTE FOR PRETTY-BOY JUSTIN TO DICTATE TO THEM FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS. CANADIANS ALSO LIVE BY THE BIG LIE
• BAD DAY MATE. AUSTRALIANS LIVE BY THE BIG LIE AS WELL. AUSTRALIANS LACK REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY

Like Americans, Canadians and Australians, New Zealanders have the right to vote. That is it.

Voting is mere illusion democracy. Voting does not equal representation.

Stupidly, in 1996, New Zealanders switched to a mixed-member proportional (MMP) electoral system from a first-past-the-post electoral system under the deception that MMP yields proportional representation. MMP fails to create what anyone needs, which is actual representation.

In the year of the switch, population to MPs jumped from a reasonable 37,105 to an unconscionable 57,415. That comes to a 1.6 times jump in one year!




Had Kiwis stuck with their FFP system, though far worse than they once were, they would have been better off.



New Zealanders went from having roughly having representative democracy to not having representative democracy at all in only one year. Although as can be seen from the above graph, New Zelanders had been steadily moving away from representative democracy right from their beginnings and especially after 1886.

And here is the picture of how many voters each MP has by electoral district as New Zealanders lack states or provinces for their sole chamber legislature.





When you discover that on a full-time, 40-hour work week with no time in Wellington, a MP could give a scant two minutes on average to each of his adult constituents, you will see the big lie about representative democracy for what it is.










Now, if New Zealanders were to have a truly representative democracy, one where each New Zealander could at least sit with his or her representative for 15 minutes, once a year and still have their representatives go to Wellington for three months to hash out the only most important matters of New Zealanders, here are the number of representatives New Zealanders need by each states.









My New Zealander friends. You have one problem. It is the same problem my Canadian friends have, my Australian friends have and my fellow Americans have. You don't have a representative democracy. You live under a dictatorship of a well-organized minority.

If you care about reality, self-determination and freedom, you will make representative democracy through authentic popular representation your only election issue.

Read more ...

BAD DAY MATE. AUSTRALIANS LIVE BY THE BIG LIE AS WELL. AUSTRALIANS LACK REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY

If you have read my recent works, you know about the Big Lie. If not, take a look at these:

• THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE
• CANADIANS VOTE FOR PRETTY-BOY JUSTIN TO DICTATE TO THEM FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS. CANADIANS ALSO LIVE BY THE BIG LIE

If you are a freedom-lover like I am, you will spread the message of these works to everyone whom you know. If you are in politics and part of the establishment, you better become fearful rather quickly. Your scam will be coming to an end faster than you ever could have believed.

Likely, Australians like their Canadian and American counterparts believe they live under a fair governance of representative democracy. Likely as well, Australians have been indoctrinated to believe so the same as Canadians and Americans.

Reality is far different from what Australians believe about their country. Unlike Canadians and us Americans who have the right to vote, you Australians have the duty to vote. Your lawgivers have granted themselves the right to force you to vote or face consequences of their designs. 

Your AEC will bully you for a $20 fine and up to a $170 fine if you end up in court. Of course, you will be forced to pay for all of the freeloaders working for your courts as well.

The Parliament of Australia is much alike to the Canadian parliament as it consists of a Governor-General representing the Queen of England, a Senate and a House of Representatives. Unlike the Canadians, but like the Americans the Australians elect their senators. And like the Americans, an equal number of Senators from each state, regardless of population, comprise the Australian Senate.

The Australian House of Representatives is much like the American House of Representatives and the House of Commons of the Canadians. It is with their House of Representatives that Australians believe they have popular representation the same as Americans and Canadians believe.

And like Americans and Canadians, Australians do not have popular representation at all. All Australians have is a vote and not even a voluntary one.

I will state it again for the benefit of my Australian friends. Voting is mere illusion. Voting does not equal representation.

Australians have suffered right from their beginning with a lack of popular representation unlike Americans who had popular representation until at least 1860.

Right now, here is how your MPs breakout by state or territory.

And here is the picture of how many voters each MP has by province. Likely, you will notice the data deals with Australians 20 and over even though the voting age in Australia is 18. Well, you can thank the Australian Bureau of Statistics for making it quite hard to get hold of the data needed to produce these charts.



When you discover that on a full-time, 40-hour work week with no time in Canberra, a MP could give a scant 59 seconds on average to each of his adult constituents, you will see the big lie about representative democracy for what it is.

Now, if Australians were to have a truly representative democracy, one where each Australian could at least sit with his or her representative for 15 minutes, once a year and still have their representatives go to Canberra for three months to hash out the only most important matters of Australians, here are the number of representatives Australians need by each states.

Australians in New South Wales need almost four times as many MPs as there is for the whole country right now! Keep in mind, these numbers would be worse if the Australian Bureau of Statistics had the census data for 18 and 19 year olds.

And here is what it would look like if MP only gave 10 minutes to each Australian, 20 and older while still hanging out in Canberra for three months. 

My Australian friends. You have one problem. It is the same problem my Canadian friends have and my fellow Americans have. You don't have a representative democracy. You live under a dictatorship of a well-organized minority.

If you care about reality, self-determination and freedom, you will make representative democracy through authentic popular representation your only election issue. 

Read more ...

CANADIANS VOTE FOR PRETTY-BOY JUSTIN TO DICTATE TO THEM FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS. CANADIANS ALSO LIVE BY THE BIG LIE.

So Canadians voted for their members of parliament, and in effect, voted for their next prime minister, the product of nepotism, Justin Trudeau. Justin, the former son of one-time Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau and short-time school teacher, Justin made a habit of staying in college well into his adult years even though he only completed two of four degrees he started.  In 2008, Justin was given his first election win as an MP.

BC resident and seemingly indoctrinated voter Cassandra Fletcher earned her 15 minutes of fame the other day by sharing on Facebook, an attention-seeking bogus open letter written to Canada's next prime minister in which Fletcher asks for Justin to revert Canada to a mythical country.  The Canadian establishment propaganda media conjured a story from Fletcher's attention-seeking Facebook behavior.

Foolishly, Cassandra believes the problem with Canada is the electoral system. Cassandra even wrote, "[Justin] be the one to recreate what democracy is in Canada."

In light of the elections, the silly beliefs held by Canadians like Cassandra, all adult Canadians ought to ask themselves if they live under a representative democracy? There is no Canadian alive today and there has not been a Canadian alive for a long time who ever lived under representative democracy.

Officially the country of Canada has a constitutional monarchy entangled still with the Queen of England, 148 years after the supposed independence of Canada. However, Canadians have a parliament that includes a House of Commons whose members, known as members of parliament (MPs), get elected by Canadian voters directly. Currently, there are 338 MPs who supposedly represent Canadians.

Much like us Americans, Canadians have been indoctrinated into believing a huge lie about their country (see: THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE.) Like, Americans, Canadians have the right to vote. That is it. And like Americans, Canadians fail to see that voting does not equal representation.

In the first ever Canadian election of 1867, there were 1,491 voters for every MP. In this election, there were 51,951 voters for every MPs.

As you can see, like their American neighbors, Canadians started out with something that resembled representative democracy. However, Canadian representative democracy began dying almost straightaway, in waves.

The first death wave came between 1873 to 1913. The second death wave ran from 1914 to 1946. A significant death wave hit between 1947 and 1975. The last death wave hit between 1976 and 2013.


Today, here is the picture of how many voters each MP has by province.




When you discover that on a full-time, 40-hour work week with no time in Ottawa, a MP could give a mere three minutes on average to each of his adult constituents — seriously three minutes.



Now, if Canadians were to have a truly representative democracy, one where each Canadian could at least sit with his or her MP for 15 minutes, once a year and still have their MP go to the House of Commons in Ottawa for three months to hash out the only most important matters of Canadians, here are the number of representatives Canadians would need by province.


Adult residents of BC are 300 MPs short of having true, minimal representative democracy.

And here is what it would look like if MPs only gave 10 minutes to each Canadian, 18 and older while still hanging out in Ottawa for three months.


The true problem for Canadians is the same problem from which adult Americans suffer  — the lack of popular representation. And like Americans, Canadians live under a dictatorship of a well-organized minority.

Any Canadian who believes she or he lives under a representative democracy has been bamboozled. If Canadians lived under a  representative democracy, there would be many political parties with no party dominant. Canadians would have more than the conjured branding messages from their NDP, Liberals and Progressive Conservatives. Likely, parties would not exist in Canada.

Instead, Canadians would get superior government from their federal system. Only the most important bills would rise to the top and become law. Canadians would be left alone and respected.

If you are an Canadian adult or soon to be adult, likely this is the most important work you have yet read in your life. You can be sure that not one candidate from any of your establishment parties would ever want you to have representation. Spread the word!

I suspect the same problem exists for Australians, New Zealanders and Brits. It's quite a shame that in only a few hundred years, all of the hard work from the geniuses of the Age of Enlightenment has been scrubbed away from political cockroaches.

This is the illusion representative democracy:

Read more ...

THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE.

In a work for the Washington Post titled, Is the United States of America a Republic or a Democracy? legal guy Eugene Volokh at UCLA Law claims Americans have a republic — citizens have the power to vote for officers and rerepresentatives — and a representative democracy — government by elected representatives.

In his work, Volokh, a native of the former communist Ukraine, in establishment apologist fashion tells his readers that "in addition to being a representative democracy, the United States is also a constitutional democracy, in which courts restrain in some measure the democratic will." Though he might be a bright guy, Volokh stretches the truth. It is the very design of the US itself through amendments to the Constitution along with public law passed by Congress that limits the democratic will.

Reality is far different from what Volokh preaches at UCLA Law and what millions of school children learn each year in America. Americans do not have representative democracy. Americans don't have democracy of any kind.

When the founders designed the United States of America with the second constitution, the founders wanted Americans to have popular representation and states' legislatures to have representation. To give Americans popular representation, they created the House of Representatives. To give states legislatures representation, they created the Senate.

For more on this, you can read about the Connecticut Compromise. Likely, most of you never heard of the Connecticut Compromise during your high school years because your states' legislators had a agenda for you to serve their purposes.

There is reason why the founders required a census in Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The reason has nothing to do with how many Hispanics there are in the USA or how many blacks or how many females. The founders design a census into the system so that Americans could have popular representation.

Sadly, today, the dictators of Congress use the census as rhetorical justification to dole out welfare to key supporting constituencies.

The United States of America as the founders intended with the Constitution of 1787 and ratified on June 21, 1788, began to die in 1870. America moved ever closer to death beginning 1910.


Representative Democracy (left). Oligarchy Illusory Democracy (right).

Americans have the right to vote. That is it.

Every election, Americans are given the choice between candidates who are branded products. In short, Americans are given the choice between Coca-cola or Pepsi (see here: AMERICAN POLITICS. 136 YEARS AGO, JAMES SAYLES BROWN DESCRIBED IT PERFECTLY!)

Voting is mere illusion. Voting does not equal representation.

If you hover over each state, you can see how many adults, 18 and up, each
House representative in that state represents.

Map 1. Number of Adult Americans for Each Member of the House of Representatives

Residents of the State of Montana have the least representation. Residents of the District of Columbia have the most representation. Yet, in a cruel twist, those who represent them are mere delegates who can't vote on bills. They can only work as committee members. 

Reality gets worse when you discover that on a full-time, 40-hour work week with no time in D.C., a representative could give mere seconds to each of his adult constituents — seriously seconds. Hover over your state and see it for yourself.

Map 2. Number of Seconds Each Adult American Can be Given by their Representative, for a Full-time, 40-hour work week and no trips to D.C.



Now, if Americans were to have a truly representative democracy, one where each adult could at least sit with his or her representative for 15 minutes, once a year and still have their representatives go to Congress for three months to hash out the only most important matters of Americans, here are the number of representatives Americans need by each states.

Map 3. 15 Minutes Once a Year with One's Representative with the Representative Three-Months in D.C., Number of Representatives Needed in Each State




Californians alone would need over six times the number of representatives than the whole House of Representatives now!

And here is what it would look like if representatives only gave 10 minutes to each adult, 18 and older while still hanging out in D.C. for three months.

Map 4. 10 Minutes Once a Year with One's Representative with the Representative Three-Months in D.C., Number of Representatives Needed in Each State

Californians would still need over four times as many representatives as the whole of the House now.

Here is how many representatives Americans would need in each state if Congress adhered to the Constitution and had each House member represent 30,000 adults.

Map 5. 30,000 Adults each Representative, Number of Representatives Needed in Each State



Bernie Sanders is quick to rail against billionaires and Wall Street, but Bernie never mentions the true problem — the lack of popular representation. Hillary Clinton is merely the light version of Bernie. Hillary makes almost the same attacks but is much softer about hers.

Shouldn't that make you wonder about Bernie and Hillary or anyone like them who claims he or she has the plan to make America better for Americans?

The jokers running for Team Red, the Republicans, don't even attack anyone who they claim is harming America. They too don't want you to know the most pressing problem that has been facing Americans for years upon years, decades even.

You can be sure the people behind the Center for Civic Education never mention this.

Campaign financing by the rich isn't the problem no matter how many times Bernie Sanders lies to you saying it is and no matter how many times Hillary Clinton lies to you saying it is.

You and all other Americans who are not part of the establishment have only one problem: You don't have a representative democracy. You live under a dictatorship of a well-organized minority.

The lack of popular representation is the true problem all of us Americans face. It should be the only election issue. If you want to fix America, you must spread the word on this.

Anyone who believes Americans live under a representative democracy has been bamboozled. Anyone who knows better and still makes the claim suffers from corrupted morality.

If only you lived under a representative democracy, there would be many political parties with no party dominant. The Democrats and the Republicans would be powerless in themselves. They would need to form coalitions with other parties and yield much of their desires to a bigger cause.

Only the most important bills would rise to the top and become law. You would have much more freedom. People who work for Congress in the various agencies overseen by the President would show you much respect.

If you lived under a representative democracy, having a high income or low income wouldn't matter nor would having much property (right of ownership) or no property in anything. You would be on equal footing with the richest man whom your representative would represent.

This is what the founders wanted for us 227 years later. Alas, we don't have it because the Democrats and the Republicans perpetuate the Biggest Lie.

If you are an American adult or soon to be an adult, likely this is the most important work you have yet read in your life. After reading this, I encourage you to read Thomas Paine's Common Sense.

You can be sure that not one candidate from either of those establishment parties would ever want you to have representation. That is why their parties colluded in during the Quiet Revolution to freeze permanently the House membership to 435 and only later did they add another three delegates for D.C.

You might like these:

• HATERS OF TEAM ELEPHANTS FOOLISHLY BLAME THE RICH FOR THE LOSS BY TEAM DONKEYS. OTHERS BLAME OBAMA. NONE HAVE IT RIGHT. HERE IS WHY. — This one shows the rapid decline of representative democracy of Americans through our history.
• THE REAL REASON WHY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WORK FOR AMERICANS ANYMORE.
• STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?
• 50 SHADES OF BERNIE SANDERS.
• A BRILLIANT LADY AND WHY DONALD TRUMP IS MOST POPULAR WITH AMERICANS

Read more ...