Monday, February 8, 2016

THE FOUNDERS OF THE USA WERE RADICALS. THEY WERE NEVER CONSERVATIVES NOR TRIBALISTS. YOU MIGHT BE A RESTORATIONIST BUT LIKELY YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE NOR TRIBALIST.

The founders were radicals. They weren't conservatives. 

The founders overthrew the conservatives — the King and the British loyalists. They established a radical, new form of governance, one based on republicanism and a union of sovereign states, a kind of government never tried anywhere by any people before.



The aim of radicalism is to destroy. The aim of conservatism is to preserve. The aim of true liberalism is to improve.

Progress means going from tribalism to individualism. It is the move away from communism in women and property to individual ownership of self, in things and in agreement with other individuals, from feudal arrangements to individuals voluntarily organizing around the trade of property in pursuit of profit.

Most Americans are free-capitalism progressives. They support the general political movement that has been ongoing since the British Enlightenment of the supremacy of the individual over the group.

They support buying and selling of goods and their own labor. Thus, they support markets. They support earning wages and thus they support how they get wages, the profitable efficiency achieved from capital. They support profits and the profit principle (see: CAPITALISM. BECAUSE WITHOUT IT, YOU WOULD BE LIVING AS A BARE SUBSISTENCE SAVAGE).

They support the right to start your own business and compete fairly without the help of government. And they support the primacy of the individual through ardent defense of the individual and his property (see: COMMERCIAL REALITY. A CRASH-COURSE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW IT ALL WORKS and THE THEORY OF TRADING PROPERTY FOR PROFIT).

That is what being a progressive truly means. Real progressives champion the individual and his property. Being progressive does not mean being hip or being a libertine.

And most Americans are restorationists. They want to revert to full adherence to the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution. Today's Americans are restorationists who want to enforce the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution in pursuit of limited politicians, enforced competition, self-rule and entrepreneuralism.

Restorationists are not conservatives. No authentic Bill of Rights American who believes in free-enterprise and the Protestant work ethic ever should want to help the Conservatives.

True conservatism means to maintain power typically derived from land ownership or monopoly or oligopoly franchise owing to laws and regulations. Conservatives seek to prevent change for themselves by discouraging every bit of competition.

Conservatives oppose true competition and defense of the individual and his property. Conservatives who tend to be the super-rich of the establishment seek to use laws and regulation to form oligopoly in markets and keep down the Middle Class (see: KILLING THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THE "WE WANT YOU TO BELIEVE CAPITAL GAINS INCOME IS DIFFERENT" TRICK).Conservatives are the champions of crony politics (see: IT'S ALWAYS CRONY POLITICS, CRONY GOVERNANCE AND CRONY REGULATORY CAPTURE and TRY CRONY POLITICS, CRONY GOVERNANCE AND CRONY REGULATORY CAPTURE BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CRONY CAPITALISM.)


The propagandists of the Republican Party have been lying to Americans for decades. They have used hot button issues — gay marriage, abortion — to gain support of good Americans and in so doing, gain the political power needed to push a globalization internationalist agenda that runs opposed to the shop keepers, mechanics, subcontractors and restaurateurs of the USA, you know, middle-class, small-businessmen. Republicans have tricked Americans into getting their votes by saying they would argue against abortion and gay marriage. 

Notice, they never said they would stop these things. And they have not. Merely they have said they would argue against such things. 

Conservatives whether Blue Dog Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans have been defending open-borders internationalism globalization for 40 years and massive immigration for over 50 years. The internationalism agenda of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of supporting massive immigration has been killing working-class Americans.

Conservatives fight to keep the existing state of affairs. The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution and the ongoing push for globalization. Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going. 

Voting for conservatives rather than nationalists for the middle class is personal economic suicide for most Americans (see: AMERICANS ARE COMMITTING (ECONOMIC) SUICIDE DAILY WITH IPHONES AND IPADS).

Rockefeller Republicans and Bushian Republicans are True Conservatives. They stand opposed the American Middle Class and the Bill of Rights.

George Herbert Walker Bush and the GOP Establishment stopped The Reagan Revolution after Reagan's departure from the White House. GHW Bush was a Trojan Horse in the Reagan White House. GHW Bush turned control of the GOP back to the eastern establishment, center-left internationalists.

We have had 27 years of Bushism globalization and internationalism in the USA and that ideological stance has brought the USA to near ruins.

Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going.  Forty-seven Republican conservatives voted yea for TPP/Fast track.  Many on the pro-TPP list also support illegal alien amnesty on the path to citizenship. They need to be voted out of office and replaced with Nationalists. 

Lisa Murkowski (AK), Dan Sullivan (AK), Jeff Flake (AZ), John McCain (AZ), John Boozman (AR), Tom Cotton (AR), Cory Gardner (CO), Marco Rubio (FL), John Isakson (GA), David Perdue (GA), Michael Crapo (ID), James Risch (ID), Mark Kirk (IL), Daniel Coats (IN), Joni Ernst (IA), Chuck Grassley (IA), Jerry Moran (KS), Pat Roberts (KS),  Mitch McConnell (KY), Bill Cassidy (LA), David Vitter (LA), Thad Cochran (MS), Roger Wicker (MS), Roy Blunt (MO), Steve Daines (MT), Deb Fischer (NE), Benjamin Sasse (NE), Dean Heller (NV), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Richard Burr (NC), Thom Tillis (NC), John Hoeven (ND), Rob Portman (OH), Jim Inhofe (OK), James Lankford (OK), Pat Toomey (PA), Lindsey Graham (SC), Tim Scott (SC), Mike Rounds (SD), John Thune (SD), Lamar Alexander (TN), John Cornyn (TX), Orrin Hatch (UT), Shelley Capito (WV), Ron Johnson (WI), John Barrasso (WY)

Here are the few Republican heroes who voted nay against TPP / Fast-track:

Jeff Sessions (AL), Richard Shelby (AL), Rand Paul (KY), Susan Collins (ME)

It's too bad that the natural-born Canadian immigrant Ted Cruz seems like a constitutionalist except when it becomes inconvenient. Cruz is running for the Republican Party nomination for the presidency, but is ineligible as he was naturalized eight years after his birth. For more, see:


What does it tell you when the majority of Democrats voted to deny their own man Obama TPP/ Fast Track?

John McCain claims to be a conservative. Marco Rubio does. They voted for TPP/Fast Track. These people support amnesty for illegals. 

Paul Ryan claims to be a conservative. Ryan gave Obama the farm to fund sanctuary cities and importation of Mohammadan immigrants from Syria.

Rupert Murdoch claims to be a conservative and he funds major open-border initiatives.

Look at all of the horrible conservative rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCUSA):
  • Kelo v. New London 
  • National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius 
  • American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc
  • King v. Burwell

Three of five SCUSA robes who ruled in the affirmative in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), were GOPher Party nominees — Justices John Paul Stevens (Ford appointee), Anthony Kennedy (Reagan appointee), David Souter (GHW Bush appointee), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton appointee) and Stephen Breyer (Clinton appointee). And Clinton was a Blue Dog (conservative) Democrat, in practicality, a Rockefeller Republican.

Kelo v New London lets big businessmen swipe property in land from small owners under the guise of improving municipal tax receipts.

Look at all of the horrible conservative reciprocal trade agreements with non-industrial countries, which only leads to the destruction of our own industry owing to wage differentials:

  • Colombia
  • Panama
  • Mexico
  • Chile
  • Peru
  • Morocco
  • Jordan
  • Costa Rica
  • El Salvador
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Nicaragua
  • Dominican Republic
The Republican Party means center-left globalization party. They have not hid this fact since Goldwater lost to LBJ. They helped to pass LBJ's Great Society legislation. They helped to pass immigration reform in 1965, the law which has given us our current state of horrible affairs of too many immigrants.

Being tricked into getting your vote by claims of arguing against abortion and gay marriage doesn't make you a conservative. Unless you are get a paycheck from party headquarters, get an appointment to office or get laws passed to protect your business, you're not in the party. Merely you have been suckered into being a fan, a subscriber, like those fools with the Sierra Club and Greenpeace.

The Republican Party always have been internationalists. Here is point 14 from their party platform going all the way back to 1860, that is, before the Civil War:

That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.
Now, there will be some who will get triggered by cognitive dissonance and want to argue for themselves as conservatives. They will err with the fallacy of appeal to authority by citing a dictionary definition. 

A dictionary is mere collection of usages whether those usages are right or wrong. Ask any dictionary editor.  As well, various dictionaries get written for estimated reading levels. 

American Thinker's own Selwyn Duke would agree with me. See what he had to say on the subject in Is Trump the First ‘European-conservative’ American Presidential Candidate?:

A prerequisite for grasping this is first understanding the true natures of liberalism and conservatism...While many have their own definitions of the latter -- and will stubbornly insist they’re correct -- the truth is that both political terms are provisional, meaning different things in different times and places. The term “conservative” in the 1970s referred to a communist in the USSR and someone staunchly anti-communist in the US... Liberalism is the process of inexorably trying to change the status quo; conservatism is the process of trying to preserve the status quo. Thus, what the terms represent will vary depending on the status quo in question."
The Russian communists fighting against the fall of the Soviet Union were conservatives. Yet, when Russian communists originally overthrew Czar Nicholas II, they were radicals.

The word conservative entered English from the Middle French conservatif in the late 1300s. The use of the word in politics traces to French disciples of Edmund Burke's opposition to the French Revolution and his call for clerical and political restoration in 1790. They called him "Le Conservateur."

By 1830 or so in Britain, conservative replaced the pejorative Tory as Tory was the name of a British political party first composed of Yorkist Tories of 1680. Tories were Irish Catholics who were dispossessed of their land and hence the label Tory, which means outlaw.

When the Democrats who controlled the 63rd United States Congress and the presidency in Woodrow Wilson established the Federal Reserve, they were radicals. Today, those who defend the Federal Reserve monetary system of 100% bank credit are conservatives. 

The Republican Party started out as radicals. They overthrew the slavery system of the South and caused a civil war over it. They were radicals when they overthrew the monetary system based on money and went with one based on greenbacks.

The Republican Party have ended up as conservatives. They are trying to preserve their 40 years of globalization and internationalism.

Free-capitalist progressive restorationists are those who believe in a limited role for government and a strict adherence to the constitution. Conservatives do not believe in these things.

The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution. Obama is a radical. Bernie Sanders is a radical.

Bernie and Obama are tribalists. Marxist / Socialists are tribalists. Tribalism is not a kind of liberalism nor a kind of progressivism. To better understand Obama, check out BEATING THE DRUMS FOR OBAMA TRIBALISM.

Hillary Clinton is a conservative. She wants to preserve the status quo of the globalists as her husband was a globalist. Ted Cruz is a conservative. So too are Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich.

Either way, whether with Obama and Bernie, or Hillary, Cruz, Rubio, Bush, Christie, or Kasich, any of those people will wreck the USA. Open-borders and international ruling boards that aren't elected by Americans will kill the USA.

To better understand what is happening, check out these:

✓ ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?
✓ NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH.

We can have free trade deals with the Canadians, with the Australians and with the Kiwis, but we should never have free trade deals with low capital countries (see: SOPHIE'S CHOICE OF CAPITAL OR LABOR. A FREE-MARKETS LIBERTARIAN BECOMES AN ANTI-CAPITALIST AND PERPETUATES AN ECONOMICS MYTH). 

Americans must demand Congress to rescind all of the trade deals with countries not close to our own in terms of industrial development as measured by GDP per capita. In fact, tariffs should be levied high against such local capital countries. Free trade deals with countries like China and Mexico kill the return on capital in the USA and thus kill high-paying jobs in the USA. All wages come from capital. 

The big firms hate domestic competition. They love these trade deals with Third World countries. It kills domestic competitors.

To see the right tariff formula: WHY TRUMP IS WINNING. THE REST ARE INTERNATIONALIST SELLOUTS WHO STAND AGAINST WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS.


You must read these works. You must read all of my works on Bizarro Theater. 

And for a general history of the Conservative Coalition, Wikipedia offers a write-up.
Read more ...

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

ALL GUN LAWS ARE ILLEGAL IN THE USA. DECODED: THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. KNOW THEIR DUTIES.

Here is the Second Amendment:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

And here is how to read it:

[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed [since] a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state [is made from the people, who are all individuals, voluntarily].

The second amendment is one of the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. All of the Bill of Rights declare that the U.S. Government never can infringe upon aspects of being an individual, in short, the U.S. Government cannot tread over any of these personal rights.

The Bill of Rights limit what the agents of Congress can do and not what individuals can do. As I showed you in CASHING IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY, all of the Bill of Rights deals with the duties the then newly formed federal government had with respect to any individual.

The biggest failing in discourse over the Bill of Rights is the lack of talk emphasizing the duties of Congress and agents of government has to any American. It is quite clear what is meant by Congress shall make no law as we see in the opening salvo to protect any individual from an overreaching government.

All laws that infringe upon the right of any individual to keep and bear arms such as requiring permits of any kind are illegal and against the Constitution of the United States of America.

In jurisprudence, which is what we're talking about here, liberty means that realm where the law (politicians) is content to leave you alone. Where politicians make laws, there are duties and rights. Always, there can be no right without a corresponding duty and thus no duty without a corresponding right.

The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with the states in compact, which is what the rest of the Constitution details. The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with conferring rights to states.

Many phrases of every day English spell out the reality of limiting government while identifying some of the weightier aspects of being an individual. In all cases, the phrase the people means anyone, even you.

The Bill of Rights is chock full of these phrases that deal solely with any American individual. The Bill of Rights does not confer rights to groups nor does it impose duties upon individuals. Congress and the states alone have duties imposed by the Bill of Rights.


  • the people to keep and bear Arms
  • without the consent of the Owner
  • The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects
  • the persons or things to be seized
  • No person shall be held to answer 
  • nor shall any person be subject for
  • nor shall be compelled 
  • nor shall private property be taken 
  • the accused shall enjoy 
  • to be informed of the nature and cause 
  • to be confronted with 
  • to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
  • the right of trial by jury shall be preserved
  • Excessive bail shall not be required
  • retained by the people
  • or to the people
Read more ...

Sunday, February 23, 2014

CASHING IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY.

The American way of life is the way of liberty. Said another way, it is the way of self-rule, of autonomy. At least it used to be. 



There were Americans long ago who had it right. Government is a creature of men and women living in society of property, a creature that must be controlled and contained. The creature never should never grow bigger and stronger than its creators. 
That is why those Americans gave us the Bill of Rights. All of the Bill of Rights deals with the duties the then newly formed federal government had with respect to any individual. 

However, since World War 1, successive Congresses have stripped Americans of the American way, little-by-little. Many Americans have been content to let this happen as long as they have gained income through subsidy, welfare or monopoly. 

The biggest failing in discourse over the Bill of Rights is the lack of talk emphasizing the duties of Congress and agents of government has to any American.

The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with the states in compact, which is what the rest of the Constitution details. The only mention of states within the Bill of Rights is in the 10th.

A reading of the Bill of Rights with the words of then-prevailing English explained reveals how far many Congresses have gone against the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. What most fail to see is how the U.S. Supreme Court works in favor of its employer, Congress.

Acts in the 20th Century and even more so in the 21st Century have been disastrous to Americans and our Bill of Rights.

There isn't a United States without full adherence to the Bill of Rights. The Constitution becomes null and void without full compliance by Congress and its executive in their duties to our rights and their prohibition from our liberties.


1st Amendment

Congress can't make laws and thus diminish liberty (autonomy, or self-rule) regarding religion, public speaking, public congregation, public petition.


2nd Amendment

Congress and its executive have a duty not to interfere in anyone's expressly stated right both to possess (keep) weapons of any kind (arms) — guns, knives, spears, axes, shields — and to bring forth (bear) those weapons whenever. 


3rd Amendment

Congress is denied the right and thus any individual lacks the duty to house any soldier during peace — when Congress has not declared war. Only owners of houses have the duty to house soldiers during times when Congress has declared war, but Congress can only exercise this right if describing the exact manner of such housing with law.


4th Amendment

Congress and its executive have a duty not to interfere in anyone's expressly stated right of possession (secure) over themselves, their houses and contents thereof, their documents and everything they have produced (effects). Only when an agent of the Federal Government has a warrant that specifically and in detail describes exactly where should be searched, exactly what should be taken in possession (seized), and exactly who should be taken in possession (seized), can such an agent act. 


5th Amendment

Congress and its executive have a right to assemble a Grand Jury but have a duty to present legal document containing a charge (indictment) against anyone for a capital crime. 

Anyone has the right to ignore any claims of having committed a capital crime, unless Congress exercises its right to assemble a Grand Jury and perform its duty of indictment. 

Congress and its executive have the right to ignore the foregoing involving military personnel during times when Congress has formally declared war or when there has been decree of public danger. 


Anyone has the right not to be tried twice for the same crime. Anyone has the right to not testify against himself. 

Thus, government has the duty to not attempt to try anyone twice. Anyone of government has the duty to not try to force someone to testify against himself. 

Therefore, government lacks authority for torture. Anyone of government has the duty not to try to trick anyone into testifying against himself.

Congress and its executive have the duty to establish law and then perform in adherence to that law before taking anyone's life or right of ownership (property) in anything or before restricting anyone's liberty (autonomy, self-rule).

When Congress and its executive have fulfilled their duty to establish law to take away anyone's right of ownership (property) in something so that all Americans can use it (public), Congress must pay that one the prevailing market price (just compensation; equitable weighing of one thing against another) and not merely any sum they feel like paying.


6th Amendment

Congress and its executive have the duty to prosecute anyone (liability) in open court (public) and to do so swiftly (speedy; without delay). Thus, anyone has the right to be prosecuted only in open court and in short time from when being charged with a crime.

Anyone accused has the right to be judged by an impartial jury. Congress and its executive have the duty to assemble an impartial jury.

Congress and its executive have the duty to define legal districts and prosecute anyone only in that district.

Anyone accused has the right to be judged only within the court district where the alleged crime has been committed. 

Anyone accused has the right to be told the reason for action (cause) and what supposedly happen (nature; course of things).

Congress and its executive have the duty to present witnesses.

Congress and its executive have the duty to create law which establishes the means for anyone accused to have supporting witnesses (witnesses in his favor). 

Congress and its executive have the duty to create law which establishes the means for anyone accused to have a lawyer (Assistance of Counsel for his defence).

Anyone has the right to have supporting witnesses (witnesses in his favor). Anyone has the right to have lawyer.


7th Amendment 

Anyone has the right to a jury at trial when facing a loss of more than twenty dollars as the outcome.

Anyone has the right to not face twice in subsequent court the same facts presented in a case when that one faces a loss of more than twenty dollars as the outcome.


8th Amendment 

Congress and its executive have the duty to not impose oppressive (excessive) bail. 

Congress and its executive have the duty to not impose oppressive (excessive) fines.

Congress and its executive have the duty to not impose neither rude, unfeeling, bloody (cruel) punishment nor not ordinary, not custom (unusual) punishment.


9th Amendment

Merely listing the foregoing rights does not give Congress the right to later define duty upon anyone in other matters not contained in the Constitution, stripping anyone of liberty and imposing duty upon them.


10th Amendment

Unless expressly stated in the Constitution, Congress and its executive lack the authority (power)  to override the capacity (power) anyone has in liberty (autonomy, self-rule). 

As well, when the Constitution prohibits the States' legislatures and their executives from having authority (power), anyone keeps his capacity (power) in liberty (autonomy, self-rule). 

Only when the Constitution fails to prohibit the States' legislatures and their executives from having authority (power), can the States' legislatures and their executives take it upon themselves to establish law and thus imposing duty and conferring right.


For a crash course in jurisprudence, read here:

LAW VS LIBERTY AND THE AMERICAN WAY.

Read more ...