A Hillary as nominee would win in a landslide against the unliked Ted Cruz, the rookie Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush. A Bernie Sanders as nominee would beat the unliked Ted Cruz, the rookie Marco Rubio and low-energy Jeb Bush.
Only two candidates can beat either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. Those two candidates are Donald Trump and John Kasich. However, only Trump would triumph with ease. Kasich would have a fight against Hillary.
A Trump victory would be dangerous for professional politicians of all stripes, both the Republicans and the Democrats.
The Last Hope of the Professional Politician Republicans
And now I will share with you the only hope the Conservatives and their Republican Party can do anything about Trump.
First, Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus needs to come out and attack both natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz and native-born U.S. citizen but not natural-born American Marco Rubio. Priebus needs to run them out of the campaign. Priebus needs to declare them ineligible precisely because they are not natural-born Americans.
Next, Reince Priebus must denounce the candidacy of Donald Trump. Priebus should state that although Trump is running for the Republican Party nomination, the party intends to ignore the primaries and at convention, nominate an actual Republican Party candidate rather than an outsider who should be running as an independent. And then Reince Priebus needs to put all the support behind who seems now as the unlikely candidate, John Kasich. The Republicans need to cut loose Jeb Bush.
Kasich served nine terms in the House of Representatives. He sat on the House Armed Services Committee for 18 years and the House Budget Committee for six. With Kasich, the establishment Republicans can brag about his welfare reform and Balanced Budget Act of 1997.
Kasich is a known quantity to FOX News watchers. Kasich hosted Heartland with John Kasich from 2001 to 2007.
John Kasich does not come saddled with the baggage of the Bush family name. Americans loathe the Bushes. They see George W. Bush as a failure and an ignorant hick. They see his dad as wimpy and an enabler.
But the establishment Republicans have something much more to leverage in John Kasich. They can position John Kasich as a get-it-done pragmatist in times that demand a get-it-done pragmatist.
They can position John Kasich as a political deal-maker and not merely a real estate deal-maker lacking political experience.
Yet the establishment Republicans need to get Kasich to propose a tougher stance on illegal aliens in the USA. Simply, they need to get Kasich to take this stance:
I'm the grandson of immigrants, legal immigrants. My grand dad was Czech and my grand ma a Croatian. We grew up blue collar, skilled blue collar workers in the industrial heartland of Pittsburgh.
And my story is your story. Legal immigrants make America great. Illegal ones do not. So we need to send back all the working-age single men and women.
Illegal single men push down wages. We can't have that for our skilled American women and men who get up every morning and make the USA what it is. I'm going to stop your paycheck cuts caused by illegal immigrants.
But we can't kick out families. Kids who have been born here are as American as you or me, even if their parents did something wrong and came here illegally. So we're stuck with the parents who we need to take care of their kids.
So we're going to send back the working-age single men and women with no kids who are making it tougher for you to make ends meet while protecting American kids because that is fair.
And that is what my presidency is all about — not foolish communism and socialism like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton — and not a shoot-from-the-hip wild idea guy like Donald Trump who has no deal-making experience with Congress.
Disclosure: I am NOT supporting a John Kasich candidacy.
The Republican Party could be over with a Trump nomination and presidential victory. Trump easily could form a new party for a re-election bid run. That would kill the GOPher party for sure.
There is a capable alternative to Twitter — Tumblr. Tumblr has all the key features of Twitter and then some.
Tumblr is the anti-Twitter and anti-Blogger platform. Tumblr wins by doing two things:
Tumblr lets you hide through being obscure and pseudo-anonymous.
Since Tumblr lets you have more than one publishing stream, Tumblr lets you be found by friends and strangers by the identity of that stream.
Tumblr is like Twitter, Instagram and Facebook all rolled up into one. You can feed pictures, video, text or audio posts into your stream. You can re-share public content of others.
Tumblr has other great features. The Tumblr Dashboard lets you consume lots of content and “reblog” easily. Tumblr supports full animated GIFs
Before we get to it, I setup my Tumblr to look like Twitter using the easy to apply theme — Twitter Theme. So if you want to follow me, click here.
@ Mentioning
Like Twitter, Tumblr supports @mention other users. It's easy too. When writing a new post, type an @ symbol and as you continue to type, Tumblr will automatically complete ("autocomplete") from the names of those you follow or even strangers. Any user who you mention in a post will receive a notification.
The mentioning feature turns Tumblr into an IM-style chat tool.
Hashtags
Tumblr doesn't have those ugly in-text hashtags as you see Twitter that clog up your timeline. You add hashtags to the tags-field. You can write into your hashtags spaces, apostrophes, commas, dots, and many other symbols in your Tumblr hashtags.
Tumblr will index only your first five hashtags. So don't bother writing more than five hash tags.
Any hashtag search will bring up users for you to follow who recently used those hashtags. So hashtags are key for acquiring followers on Tumblr.
Tumblr filters hashtag search results by "most popular" by default. You can switch this to "most recent".
On the Tumblr dashboard, Tumblr has a “track your tags” feature so you can add hashtag search results to the dashboard side bar.
EMAIL Publishing
Write to Tumblr through email. Send an email to your Tumblr-given email publishing address. Use the subject line of the email for your title. You can even add hashtags at the bottom of the email.
Tumblr supports queueing. This lets you to line up posts into your queue for scheduled posts. It is simple to use. Once turned on, keep sharing stuff on your Tumblr. Tumblr will automatically stagger posts throughout the day. As well, you can embargo publishing of content until specific dates and times.
There is no such thing is Islamophobia. There is only Islamomisia.
Saying there is Islamophobia is alike saying there is Marxistophobia or Communismophobia. Are there those who are Republicanophobic?
The practitioners of Mohammadism ("Islam") continue to be the worldwide cancer of mankind.
There are 1.62 billion misguided on this earth who are adherents of Mohammadism, a totalitarian doctrine steeped in pseudo-theology much much alike to the way communism was steeped in pseudo-science. Like communism, Mohammadism is a kind of tribalism, a doctrine diametrically opposed to individualism.
Mohammadans want to impose their medieval, unscientific, retrogressive totalitarianism upon the world, which they believe brings peace to all who are Mohammadans. To Mohammadans, the concept of peace for them means they will live in peace when they vanquish all non-believers.
If mankind wants world peace, Mohammadism must be eradicated. Almost all of the world's hot spot wars involve devout Mohammadans ("Muslims") seeking to rule by sharia law.
Anti-Civilization
Mohammadans and their doctrine of Mohammadism reject liberty, science and progress.
Followers of Mohammadism never can produce civilization much less live by civilization. For the true meaning of civilization is rule by impartial law in protection of the individual. And the true meaning of progress is the advance of the individual and his property, which is the right of ownership, from any overlord or over group acting in concert as an overlord.
If there has been life in Mohammadan communities, it has been life imparted from appropriated by conquest. Nothing they have has been generated by themselves.
95% of the wars on earth right now are being fought by Mohammadans against others in struggles to gain sovereign power under the guise of their religion. The other 5% are being fought by drug lords. For more, see: Wars in the World.
Mohammadans
The average IQ for the ummah — worldwide Mohammadans is 81. Before 1973, all psychologists would have considered the Mohammadan world as being mentally retarded. Today, Mohammadans are a mere 11 points what psychologists recognize as Mild Mental Retardation and nine points below what psychologists recognize as normal.
So few Mohammadans can complete Western-standards high school and college education.
Many Mohammadans have minimal independent self-help skills and simple learning skills. Though many can dress and bathe independently, they can do little more than simple jobs requiring little more than elementary school academics. They can live independently but with difficulties. At best, some can perform jobs with simple and repetitive tasks. Some can complete vocational education and live independently.
Mohammadism
Mohammadism is a wicked political doctrine masquerading as a religious doctrine. Mohammadism is a kind of totalitarianism, the same as Communism. Mohammadism is a kind of totalitarianism that hides behind pseudo-theology in the same way that communism hid behind pseudo-science.
Mohammadism is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich, micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below. The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology – a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.
Mohammadism was devised by a power-hungry madman, Mohammad, to control many other men, millions of them and eventually all, if his plan would be realized by him or his followers. All of the religious talk is a lever to get initiates to turn into true believers by submitting.
Mohammadism isn't one of the great religions of the world. Mohammadism is a bastardization of Judaism combined with false narratives about Jesus.
Mohammadism ("Islam") is the doctrine of a cult. Mohammadism has all of the telling signs of a cult. It's the largest cult among the world. The adherents of Mohammadism are hyper indoctrinated.
Mohammadism is a horrible doctrine of totalitarianism that only the mindless could follow. Mohammadism appeals to the masses with low IQs.
Though almost all Mohammadan males can't be part of the leadership — the upper echelon that enjoy the fruits of control, as all cult leaders do — Mohammadan males get to be dictators of their households. That is why there are 1.62 billion Mohammadan adherents to this pseudo-religion.
Over half of the 1.62 billion Mohammadan world want to live under Sharia law or already do.The ummah — which is worldwide Mohammadans — want sharia law to replace all laws of every country on earth.
According to the writers of Wikipedia, an Mohammadan state is a state that has adopted Mohammadism, specifically sharia, as its foundations for political institutions, or laws, exclusively, and has implemented the Islamic ruling system — khilafah — and is therefore a theocracy.
Sharia is the official basis for state laws in the following countries:
Afghanistan (29.82 million)
Iran (76.42 million)
Mauritania (3.796 million)
Saudi Arabia (28.29 million)
Somalia (10.2 million)
Sudan (37.2 million)
Yemen (23.85 million).
Mohammadism is the official religion of Pakistan (179.2 million) and its Federal Sharia Court has the duty of striking down any law not complying with the Sharia Mohammadan law.
No one should be forced to give up his life and ways so that Mohammadans can dominate and impose their idiotic Sharia Law.
Militarism
Mohammadism is the military religion of the plundering Bedouin. Militarism, despotism, fatalism, polygamy, concubinage, and slavery cleave to it as parts of its nature everywhere and in all times.
Of all systems, Mohammadism seems to be about the most effectual for destroying spiritual, moral, social and political life ever devised by man of those Mohammadans seek to conquer.
Jihad
Jihad means the struggle to expand Mohammadism in effort to realize the Mohammadan ideal of world domination with Mohammadan leaders in control. Mohammadans seek to extend their borders as widely as they can. Under the Mohammadan ideal, only those who profess to be Mohammadans are allowed to live.
Mohammadans who do not join the fight are called hypocrites. To induce action through fear, their religious leaders try to scare them into joining in the jihad. The are told The Lah will send them to Hell if they do not.
Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:
“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Mohammadism, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Mohammadism: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Mohammadism; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Mohammadism, or die.”
Hijrah
Hijrah is Jihad by other means. Hijrah is the spreading of the Ummah — worldwide Mohammadans — through immigration. It is spreading the reach of Mohammadism through earthly migration.
ISIS is the eptome of what it means to be a Mohammadan. In his speech, Obama listed the atrocities of ISIS — threatening those who are not Sunni Mohammadans with genocide, excution of prisoners, killing of children, raping of women, forcing women into marriages. In short, Obama pointed out that ISIS are Mohammadans who are carrying out Mohammadan jihad, though Obama failed to name it for what it is — Mohammadan jihad.
Mohammadism is False Theology
There is no con like a religious con and Mohammad was the biggest religious con artist of all-time. Mohammad was a confidence man who decided to set up his own religion to take over.
Mohammadism is radical, false theology, a radical Judaism. At bottom, Mohammadism is the bastard offspring of a Christian father and a Jewish mother. It's heresy, a heretical pseudo-Christian cult.
The basis of it is a badly plagiarized Judaism combined with heretical works about Jesus. An illiterate from the Arabian desert, Mohammad made it up from non-biblical sources including long rejected phony gospels written about Jesus. Scholars have studied this and have known this since the 1800s. The never-was-a-prophet Mohammad turned his badly plagiarized work into an aggressive war mongering doctrine.
The illiterate Mohammad must of thought of himself as the über Jew. The illiterate Mohammad who couldn't possibly have studied the Torah nor the Gospels as he demanded that Jews must believe more and Christians must believe less.
It's all too convenient when a guy claims an angel visited him and told him things that somehow the omnipotent creator of the universe inconveniently forgot to mention to a whole bunch of other people — the Jews — over thousands of years. Illiterate Mohammad's trick is akin to me claiming that I have been visited by the Jewish angel Gabriel only the other day and he said to me that God forgot to mention that he lied to Mohammad in a giant supernatural joke.
There is no evidence in the Koran that Mohammad ever read a copy of the New Testament. Yet, Mohammad gave a name to the New Testament. Mohammad called it the Injil.
Idiotically, Mohammad claims the New Testament was given to given Jesus. Considering the New Testament is a collection of books formed after Jesus' death, Mohammad's publicly-expressed idiocy alone reveals that Mohammad didn't know much of anything about Jesus and the rise of Christianity after Jesus' death.
Mohammad claimed that after Jesus left the earth, his disciples disputed as to whether he was a prophet like Moses or Isaiah or a part of the Godhead making up the Trinity as The Father, the Mother and the Son. Again, as the Trinity doesn't consist of Mary, Mohammad could not have been given the inspired word of God through Gabriel.
Its morality is vitiated and paralyzed as a motive by the admixture of the most abject ceremonialism — postures, pilgrimages, ablutions — with their most frivolous details being placed on a level with matters of its Law. Prayer being assessed by an absurd tariff according to the place in it is made.
For more on the false theology, see heading The Koran at the end of this work.
The Lah, a Puny False Deity
The monotheism of Mohammadism is unreal. Its The Lah is power who gives the world over as prey to Mohammadism.
To Mohammadans, the concept of peace for them means they will live in peace when they vanquish all non-believers. Any "god" who decides some will be unbelievers who reject Mohammadism so that anointed others can kill them could only ever be a great deceiver, a Satan and never any kind of god much less the real God.
Wouldn't a supreme being have the power to instantly kill off all the infidels and save his faithful all of the trouble of doing the work of a god?
How could the Lah have the power of a god much less be the God if the Lah must hire ordinary puny men to kill other men on his behalf? The Lah seems like a weak-assed wimp, a coward and hardly worthy of the title of god.
The Shahada
The basis of Mohammadism is a simple creed called the Shahada. As parroted by Mohammadans, the Shahada goes like this:
"there is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah."
But truly what Mohammadans are saying is this:
The God of Jesus won't save you (There is no god) Only Satan will (but Allah) and Muhammad is the spreader of Satanism (Muhammad is his messenger).
Mohammadans are telling the world: Don't worship God [There is no God]. Instead worship Satan [but Allah], and Muhammad is the messenger of Satan [Allah]."
Mohammad vs Jesus
There is a big difference between Mohammadism and what Jesus taught, which is separate from what men who go into the religion business peddle about Jesus.
Murder for Mohammad is the slogan of Mohammadism. No one on earth can deny that reality.
Mohammad taught anyone who wasn't willing to submit to Mohammad's plan ought to be murdered because that one lacked fidelity to Mohammad's plan. Hence Mohammad called them infidels. An infidel is someone who lacks fidelity, that is, exacting adherence.
The concept of dying for Jesus or dying to Jesus is most misunderstood by religionists of all stripes, be them adherents to Catholicism or a Protestant doctrine.
Jesus taught that man needed to lose himself, in essence, his old self had to die so that his new self could be born. And by that Jesus meant, that a man needed to stop adhering to the religion of other men, the foolishness taught by other men, that men had to stop following religious rules, and striving to be seen as pious by doing such foolery as praying in public.
Once a man had stopped all status seeking and approval through religion, a man could find his true self and in so doing, a man would be as a child, as all children implicitly love others who are good to them, who are kind to them, who even are normal to them without being overly kind or overly good to them. Jesus was an individualist who taught without wavering, an individualist message, as the way to living a fulfilling, loving life in the right now, here on earth and not in some after life. For the truth of the true gospel, the good news about Jesus and you, check out: WHY JESUS? WHAT IS THE TRUE GOSPEL? HERE IS THE ONLY GOSPEL FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD.
Sacrifice vs Marytrdom
Sacrifice is what Mohammadans do when they blow up themselves trying to kill others. Mohammadans are doing something to others — trying to kill them — and are willing to die trying to kill others for the sake of their deity, their Satan known as The Lah.
Early Christians were murdered for professing the truth of Jesus. In the history of early Christianity, some Christians were tortured to death for their professed belief. They experienced martyrdom.
Men can attest the word martyr in Old English and taken from Late Latin, in turn taken from Doric Greek to mean torture-witness. The word martyrdom means torture-witness judgment. In late the Old English period, men said the Latin word confessor to mean one who avows his religion especially in the face of danger, but does not suffer martyrdom.
Men can attest the word sacrifice to about 1300. Taken from the Old French, it means to offer something to a deity, especially a life in appeasement, duty.
Killing yourself for what you believe is sacrifice. Being killed by others is martyrdom.
Mohammadans engage in sacrifice during jihad. Christians killed by Romans, Mohammadans and others have been killed by martyrdom.
False Religion vs True Religion
True religion is individualistic and works as wisdom to guide an individual to betterment regardless what the mass of people do. True religion helps the individual help himself in his relationships with his fellows.
False religion requires submission of individuals to the dictates of the group. False religion leads the deceived to submit on their knees, to subordinate themselves to political leaders of all stripes, even those who speak with religious words. All cults rely upon false religion, whether communism, socialism or Mohammadism.
Anyone can follow Jesus on his own. No one can follow Mohammadism on his own. No one can follow communism on his own.
The Crusades
Many point to ancient history and the Crusades as the same evil, wrongdoing as Mohammadans. Crusaders were Roman Catholics.
To suggest they were Christians adhering to the teachings of Jesus rather than what they were doing — adhering to the teachings of popes and priests — is a huge stretch. That said, the Crusades began as a push back against the jihad of Mohammadans.
The Erased Genocide Against Armenians
The Ottoman Empire was the last caliphate. That is what the jokers behind ISIS, the wahhabist Mohammadans are trying to re-establish.
To give you perspective, in the Armenian Genocide, the caliphate Mohammadans wiped out the equivalent to Philadelphia, PA, or Phoenix, Arizona
U.S. Congress and the Obama Policy Toward the Middle East
What a mess Obama Administration has made in the world. The Obama policy of Containment is a failed, dangerous policy.
ISIS has already established a caliphate to attract Mohammadans to immigrate to the Islamic State. The Ummah — worldwide Mohammadans — see the rise of the Islamic State as a blessing from The Lah.
The right policy is to let Middle Easter Mohammadans fight it out until they kill each other. Perhaps it is time to block imports from all Sharia-law Mohammadan countries and prohibit exports to the same.
The Sunni Saudis and Kuwaits and their hated Shia neighbors, the Iranians, have the most to lose if ISIS were to prevail.
Instead, if the U.S. political establishment were to make peace with the Russians and then make the Russians Americans' biggest ally, Americans could isolate the whole Mohammadan Middle East, the source of worldwide craziness.
As well, Congress needs to divest Americans from any trade and cooperation with Saudi Arabians. The Saudi Arabians are the chief exporter of worldwide jihad. The Saudi Arabians with their wahhabism brand of Mohammadism fund almost all of the Wars for Mohammadan Conquest. They are trying to usher in an era of Mohammadan dominance.
U.S. Congress Policy Toward Domestic Mohammadism
Mohammadism and American life are incompatible. American life, or Americanism, if you prefer, arose from British Enlightenment idealism — the sanctity of the individual and his right of ownership (property). Further, Americanism arose from Protestant Christians establishing religious freedom for themselves.
There are no such persons as "American muslims". There are only Mohammadans or Mohammadans converts who have U.S. citizen status.
Congress needs to strip persons who practice Mohammadism from their non-profit religious status and designate them what they are — insurgents who are trying to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and the various states' constitutions so they can institute sharia law.
Mohammadans are Winning (for now)
Of late, the Mohammadans have been winning. They slaughtered Americans on 9/11 forcing many to leap 100 stories to their deaths. They booby-trapped our guys in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Obama has been importing Mohammadans into the USA more by the hundreds of thousands. These people will end up overthrowing the USA without ever firing a shot.
Even school district officials are giving off heathen holidays for Mohammadan worshipers.
Hope
Mohammadans need to awaken to their idiocy and renounce their evil way before it is too late. If only self-identifying Mohammadans would awaken to the cult under which they live and subjugate themselves. If only they would walk away from their warring, world-domination questing cult of Mohammed that claims they can usher in peace only first by murdering all who do not want to join their cult.
Everyone of the world would be safer if 1.62 billion individuals quit the warring, world-domination questing cult of Mohammed, a false-god totalitarianism of quite real hate.
Mohammadism is a political system, not a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and stops referring to it as a religion, there is no hope.
If mankind wants world peace, Mohammadism must be eradicated. It is the greatest evil of our time.
Doubters
Doubters need to learn the meanings of these words — taqiyya, ummah, hijrah, jihad, fatwa, kafir, hunda, haram.
Watch on YouTube what a Canadian woman Mohammadan activist says about her own religion — the statistics and the beliefs:
—————
Koran ("Quran")
The Koran contains at least 109 verses that call Mohammadans to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Mohammadan rule. Behold some of the words of the Koran.
Koran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Mohammadans] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."
Koran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Koran (2:216) "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
Koran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Koran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast TERROR into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".
Koran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."
Koran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"
Koran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."
Koran (4:95) - "Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward"
Koran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."
Koran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"
Koran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."
Koran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."
Koran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah."
Koran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."
Koran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."
Koran (9:14) - "Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace..."
Koran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."
Koran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Koran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"
Koran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."
Koran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them."
Koran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."
Koran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."
Koran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Koran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."
Koran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Koran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."
Koran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."
Koran (47:3-4) - "Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similtudes. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners,"
Koran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"
Koran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."
Koran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves."
Koran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way."
Koran (61:10-12) - "O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity."
Koran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."
As well, I have shared with you all of the legal reasons why the natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz is ineligible to become president of the United States of America in these:
Marco Rubio is a native-born U.S. citizen. That is not in question. Yet, being native-born does not equate with being natural-born.
All courts would recognize Rubio as a native-born under the 14th Amendment as well as under Congress' naturalizing law, 8 U.S. CODE § 1401. However, the purpose of the the 14th Amendment was to impose upon the states prohibition of passing laws that could strip ex-slave Americans of the full and equal protection of any law. The 14th Amendment fails to make anyone natural-born.
A key concept of being natural-born is natural allegiance. Natural allegiance arises from jurisdiction and citizenship of parents.
A.O. Wright wrote, "A child born of American parents in any place under American [Congress] jurisdiction is unquestionably a natural-born American citizen." And when you think about it even without being a lawyer, this should seem right. If your parents are U.S. citizens and you're born in any of the 50 states or if you were born in any of the organized, incorporated territories of the United States, you're natural born.
Today, the USA lacks organized, incorporated territories. The last two became the states of Hawaii and Alaska.
When Marco Rubio was born, both of his parents were natural-born Cubans and citizens of Cuba residing within Florida, clearly a state of the United States of America. Marco Rubio's parents had natural allegiance to Cuba. They could have worked as spies for the Communist Castro Cuban government. They could have been sent to produce a Manchurian candidate.
As Rubio's parents lacked natural allegiance to Congress and as their natural-born son, that is, not adopted son, it's quite likely that Rubio also lacked natural allegiance to Congress in spite of being born under the jurisdiction of Congress.
Thus, it's quite likely that Marco Rubio is not a natural-born American and therefore, like natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio cannot swear the oath of office for the presidency of the USA.
It is the lack of citizenship of his parents that calls into jeopardy Marco Rubio's eligibility to run for the presidency.
And though many would like this to mean the entire Obama presidency has been illegal, it's not likely as Obama's mamma was a natural-born U.S. citizen.
Here is an interesting video from a woman who bills herself as Publius Hudlah. Hudlah publishes her work at Publius-Huldah's Blog
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall any State deprive any person of life liberty or property without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
In The Constitution of the United States: Notes of the Decisions of the Supreme Court Thereon from the Organization of the Court till October, 1900 Edwin Eustace Bryant wrote:
In Our Constitution: Why and How it Was Made - Who Made It, and What It Is, Edward Waterman Townsend wrote:
Every poll that you will see and hear reported by television broadcasters, hear reported by radio broadcasters, or read published by newspapers and websites regarding the upcoming presidential race will be fabricated and not scientific. Every survey will be flawed and unscientific. Thus no results they claim can get projected to the universe of voters.
Pollsters use a totally wrong, unscientific method. Typically, they survey between 700 and 1,000 people chosen randomly. Let's say these 1,000 people get chosen by equal distribution, that is, 20 in each state.
No one can project the results from a mere 20 persons to the universe of voters in any state. Thus, the number of surveys completed would be too small. Every statistician worth his salt should know this truth.
However, there is a far more damning reason why you should denounce all polls being foisted upon you. Because of the electoral college, the presidential election is fifty seven (57) separate elections and requires 57 surveys for full coverage to predict the full results. An accurate poll must account for the electoral college since presidential election doesn't get decided by the popular vote.
There is one election in each of 48 states that have winner-take-all elections for the electoral college electors. Two states, Maine and Nebraska, lack winner-take-all elections. Those states combine for nine elections.
The founding fathers established [the Electoral College] in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.
The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. Your state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators.
Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. For this reason, in the following discussion, the word “state” also refers to the District of Columbia.
If a pollster did not need to account for the electoral college, to get a margin of error ± 4% would require 784 completed surveys at the 95% confidence level. Yet, because a presidential election is 57 separate elections and not one, proper polling requires 57 polls, each with 784 completed questionnaires for a margin of error of ±4%. That's 48 polls for the all-or-nothing states and nine polls for each electoral district of Maine and Nebraska.
For results that have a margin of error ±4% at the 95% confidence anyone surveying would need to complete 44,688 surveys and all on the same day! Otherwise, you don't have a scientifically conducted poll with results that can get projected to the universe of voters.
The math: 784 surveys × 57 = 44,688
The United States Election Assistance Commission, which Congress established by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) as an independent, bipartisan commission, serves as a national clearinghouse of information on election administration and produces the foremost data collection effort related to voter registration, election administration, and the ways in which Americans cast their ballots.
The EAC defines two concepts:
Voting Age Population (VAP): People who are 18 years of age or older, regardless of whether they are eligible to register to vote.
Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP): Persons who are citizens and of voting age (18 years or older). These numbers are estimates generated by the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey.
We only care about the CVAP numbers. With the CVAP numbers, for each state, we can adjust the number of needed completed questionnaires to the count of legal voters in each state and still maintain our targeted margin of error with confidence. As it turns out, we can cut down the number of completed questionnaires to 600 for each state, except Wyoming, which we can cut down by one less to 599.
Here is what the completed questionnaire counts should look like:
Also, if some of the survey respondents complete a questionnaire before a candidate said something controversial, say freeze all immigration from countries with Mohammadans, while other survey respondents complete\ the same questionnaire afterward, the results cannot be used since the opinions are collected on different facts. Time-sensitive surveys like voting surveys must be done on the same day for all respondents to be accurate.
Now, during the 2012 presidential election campaign, a pollster would have needed to complete 9,000 questionnaires all on the same day to predict Obama the winner.
Nearly all presidential election polls have completed survey counts of 500 to 1,000. Thus, the results from such polls cannot be projected to the universe of likely voters, hence such pollsters report wrong results. In short, do not believe any of those polls.
Also, every time another variable gets added, doubling of completed surveys must happen. So if a legit pollster wants to know how Latina females plan to vote, such a pollster would need to complete a whopping 89,376 surveys on the same day within a tight news window!
Every poll ever reported on television and every poll ever printed in a newspaper regarding presidential races have been fabricated. Such polls were never scientific. Until polls adopt the scientific method of polling, all future presidential polls will be wrong.
Disclosure: I used to work as the director of public opinion polling and marketing research for a Dow Jones owned newspaper. My grad work at S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications included public opinion polling.
In 2016, a Democratic candidate must secure at least 2,382 out of 4,763 delegates to become the party’s nominee. The number of delegates allocated to each state takes into account the state’s Democratic vote in the previous three presidential elections and its assigned number of Electoral College votes.
Meanwhile, a Republican candidate must secure at least 1,237 out of 2,472 delegates to win the party’s nomination. The Republican Party allocates each state ten delegates, plus three for each congressional district, and bonus delegates for states that contributed electoral votes to the party in the previous presidential election, as well those that elected Republicans to high offices.
Right now, at his pace, Jeb Bush would need to spend $21.03 billion to secure the nomination. Marco Rubio would need to spend $4.771 billion to capture the GOPher party nomination. John Kasich would need to spend $4.36 billion.
Jeb, Rubio, Kasich — they are not viable considering the national election might need another billion or two in spending.
Meanwhile, self-funded billionaire businessman Donald Trump would only need to spend $509 million to win the Republican nomination from restorationist voters.
Jeb Bush was the Republican Party establishment's anointed candidate. Bush would need to spend 97% more than Trump. Said another way, for every one dollar Jeb Bush would need to spend to capture the nomination, Donald Trump would need to spend only two pennies.
It's the price per delegate and securing the most delegates that counts.
Two candidates stood tall among their competitors in their respective parties. Donald Trump smashed his Republican Party establishment rivals capturing more than twice as many votes as the runner up John Kasich and more than three times as many votes as other Republican Party establishment candidates — Cruz, Jeb Bush, Rubio.
For the Democrats, for every 100 voters for Hillary Clinton, there were 154 for Bernie Sanders. So how did Bernie win?
First, all should notice that as a senator from Vermont, Sanders could be considered a favored-son candidate in next door New Hampshire. Yet, here are the reasons:
The Democratic Party continues to shift further left.
As even more of a leftist, Bernie Sanders is the heir apparent to Obama.
Bernie is the guy who wants to give it all to the down-trodden — no-job blacks, fast-food Hispanics, no-hubby young mommies — and take all from rich white folks who are only rich because of white privilege.
In short, Bernie won the young new Democrat vote while the blue-collar white traditional household Democrats either stayed home in protest against Hillary or because they plan to vote for Trump in the general election.
Back on November 14, 2014, in Why Democrats Can’t Win Over White Working-Class Voters, Jamelle Bouie of Slate (disclosure: I don't read Slate. I found the work by googling), wrote that white working-class Americans without college degrees no longer want anything to do with the Democratic Party.
Bouie stated, "Democrats don’t have to win this group as much as they have to avoid a rout." Hillary is the kind of Democrat who needs that group but they're going for Trump.
In the absence of white, no-college, skilled working-class voters, the remaining Democrats who show up to the polls are the leftists. So it should surprise no one, the leftists voted for Bernie.
It should be clear. Trump is having a huge effect on both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Trump might be more responsible for Bernie Sander's success than Sanders himself.
Donald Trump slaughtered the establishment Republican Party candidates today. Trump did so without wasted effort. Trump visited New Hampshire a small number but the right number of times. Trump focused his campaigning in a narrow geographic corridor near the Massachusetts border and along the coast.
John Kasich the Ohio governor who always talks about his post office working dad spent big to win a distant second. Some reports say Kasich spent as much as $14 million. Kasich also visited tiny New Hampshire 100 times or so.
Kasich put his marbles in winning New Hampshire because his strategy is to avoid the south and focus on the Northeast and the Great Lakes.
Natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz squeaked passed Jeb Bush for third. Cruz barely won last week in the burnt-over state, Iowa. And Cruz needed shenanigans to swipe Ben Carson's support.
Likely, Cruz picked up voters from race dropout Rand Paul. New Hampshire swings libertarian as it is known as the home of the Free State Project.
Cruz continues to face questions about his likely illegal campaign. For more on that see:
Most Americans are neither conservatives nor socialists. Many Americans don't vote.
Most Americans are hopeful restorationists. Like most good Americans, Trump is a restorationist. Trump set the restorationist agenda — Make America Great Again.
Trump is the candidate disparate voters have sought for a long time. To Tea Party people, Trump is the Tea Party candidate. For Pat Buchanan types, Trump is the Buchanan candidate. For Ross Perot types, Trump is the Perot candidate.
Trump is the Restorationist candidate who can capture power from the establishment Republican Party.
For more on the rise of the restorationists, check out my key works:
The founders were radicals. They weren't conservatives.
The founders overthrew the conservatives — the King and the British loyalists. They established a radical, new form of governance, one based on republicanism and a union of sovereign states, a kind of government never tried anywhere by any people before.
The aim of radicalism is to destroy. The aim of conservatism is to preserve. The aim of true liberalism is to improve.
Progress means going from tribalism to individualism. It is the move away from communism in women and property to individual ownership of self, in things and in agreement with other individuals, from feudal arrangements to individuals voluntarily organizing around the trade of property in pursuit of profit.
Most Americans are free-capitalism progressives. They support the general political movement that has been ongoing since the British Enlightenment of the supremacy of the individual over the group.
They support buying and selling of goods and their own labor. Thus, they support markets. They support earning wages and thus they support how they get wages, the profitable efficiency achieved from capital. They support profits and the profit principle (see: CAPITALISM. BECAUSE WITHOUT IT, YOU WOULD BE LIVING AS A BARE SUBSISTENCE SAVAGE).
That is what being a progressive truly means. Real progressives champion the individual and his property. Being progressive does not mean being hip or being a libertine.
And most Americans are restorationists. They want to revert to full adherence to the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution. Today's Americans are restorationists who want to enforce the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution in pursuit of limited politicians, enforced competition, self-rule and entrepreneuralism.
Restorationists are not conservatives. No authentic Bill of Rights American who believes in free-enterprise and the Protestant work ethic ever should want to help the Conservatives.
True conservatism means to maintain power typically derived from land ownership or monopoly or oligopoly franchise owing to laws and regulations. Conservatives seek to prevent change for themselves by discouraging every bit of competition.
The propagandists of the Republican Party have been lying to Americans for decades. They have used hot button issues — gay marriage, abortion — to gain support of good Americans and in so doing, gain the political power needed to push a globalization internationalist agenda that runs opposed to the shop keepers, mechanics, subcontractors and restaurateurs of the USA, you know, middle-class, small-businessmen. Republicans have tricked Americans into getting their votes by saying they would argue against abortion and gay marriage.
Notice, they never said they would stop these things. And they have not. Merely they have said they would argue against such things.
Conservatives whether Blue Dog Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans have been defending open-borders internationalism globalization for 40 years and massive immigration for over 50 years. The internationalism agenda of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of supporting massive immigration has been killing working-class Americans.
Conservatives fight to keep the existing state of affairs. The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution and the ongoing push for globalization. Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going.
Rockefeller Republicans and Bushian Republicans are True Conservatives. They stand opposed the American Middle Class and the Bill of Rights.
George Herbert Walker Bush and the GOP Establishment stopped The Reagan Revolution after Reagan's departure from the White House. GHW Bush was a Trojan Horse in the Reagan White House. GHW Bush turned control of the GOP back to the eastern establishment, center-left internationalists.
We have had 27 years of Bushism globalization and internationalism in the USA and that ideological stance has brought the USA to near ruins.
Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going. Forty-seven Republican conservatives voted yea for TPP/Fast track. Many on the pro-TPP list also support illegal alien amnesty on the path to citizenship. They need to be voted out of office and replaced with Nationalists.
Lisa Murkowski (AK), Dan Sullivan (AK), Jeff Flake (AZ), John McCain (AZ), John Boozman (AR), Tom Cotton (AR), Cory Gardner (CO), Marco Rubio (FL), John Isakson (GA), David Perdue (GA), Michael Crapo (ID), James Risch (ID), Mark Kirk (IL), Daniel Coats (IN), Joni Ernst (IA), Chuck Grassley (IA), Jerry Moran (KS), Pat Roberts (KS), Mitch McConnell (KY), Bill Cassidy (LA), David Vitter (LA), Thad Cochran (MS), Roger Wicker (MS), Roy Blunt (MO), Steve Daines (MT), Deb Fischer (NE), Benjamin Sasse (NE), Dean Heller (NV), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Richard Burr (NC), Thom Tillis (NC), John Hoeven (ND), Rob Portman (OH), Jim Inhofe (OK), James Lankford (OK), Pat Toomey (PA), Lindsey Graham (SC), Tim Scott (SC), Mike Rounds (SD), John Thune (SD), Lamar Alexander (TN), John Cornyn (TX), Orrin Hatch (UT), Shelley Capito (WV), Ron Johnson (WI), John Barrasso (WY)
Here are the few Republican heroes who voted nay against TPP / Fast-track:
Jeff Sessions (AL), Richard Shelby (AL), Rand Paul (KY), Susan Collins (ME)
Ted Cruz (TX), Michael Enzi (WY).
For more right from Bizarro Theater on the horrible Obamatrade and globalization pushed by conservatives:
It's too bad that the natural-born Canadian immigrant Ted Cruz seems like a constitutionalist except when it becomes inconvenient. Cruz is running for the Republican Party nomination for the presidency, but is ineligible as he was naturalized eight years after his birth. For more, see:
What does it tell you when the majority of Democrats voted to deny their own man Obama TPP/ Fast Track?
John McCain claims to be a conservative. Marco Rubio does. They voted for TPP/Fast Track. These people support amnesty for illegals.
Paul Ryan claims to be a conservative. Ryan gave Obama the farm to fund sanctuary cities and importation of Mohammadan immigrants from Syria.
Rupert Murdoch claims to be a conservative and he funds major open-border initiatives.
Look at all of the horrible conservative rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCUSA):
Kelo v. New London
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc
King v. Burwell
Three of five SCUSA robes who ruled in the affirmative in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), were GOPher Party nominees — Justices John Paul Stevens (Ford appointee), Anthony Kennedy (Reagan appointee), David Souter (GHW Bush appointee), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton appointee) and Stephen Breyer (Clinton appointee). And Clinton was a Blue Dog (conservative) Democrat, in practicality, a Rockefeller Republican.
Kelo v New London lets big businessmen swipe property in land from small owners under the guise of improving municipal tax receipts.
Look at all of the horrible conservative reciprocal trade agreements with non-industrial countries, which only leads to the destruction of our own industry owing to wage differentials:
Colombia
Panama
Mexico
Chile
Peru
Morocco
Jordan
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Nicaragua
Dominican Republic
The Republican Party means center-left globalization party. They have not hid this fact since Goldwater lost to LBJ. They helped to pass LBJ's Great Society legislation. They helped to pass immigration reform in 1965, the law which has given us our current state of horrible affairs of too many immigrants.
Being tricked into getting your vote by claims of arguing against abortion and gay marriage doesn't make you a conservative. Unless you are get a paycheck from party headquarters, get an appointment to office or get laws passed to protect your business, you're not in the party. Merely you have been suckered into being a fan, a subscriber, like those fools with the Sierra Club and Greenpeace.
The Republican Party always have been internationalists. Here is point 14 from their party platform going all the way back to 1860, that is, before the Civil War:
That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.
Now, there will be some who will get triggered by cognitive dissonance and want to argue for themselves as conservatives. They will err with the fallacy of appeal to authority by citing a dictionary definition.
A dictionary is mere collection of usages whether those usages are right or wrong. Ask any dictionary editor. As well, various dictionaries get written for estimated reading levels.
A prerequisite for grasping this is first understanding the true natures of liberalism and conservatism...While many have their own definitions of the latter -- and will stubbornly insist they’re correct -- the truth is that both political terms are provisional, meaning different things in different times and places. The term “conservative” in the 1970s referred to a communist in the USSR and someone staunchly anti-communist in the US... Liberalism is the process of inexorably trying to change the status quo; conservatism is the process of trying to preserve the status quo. Thus, what the terms represent will vary depending on the status quo in question."
The Russian communists fighting against the fall of the Soviet Union were conservatives. Yet, when Russian communists originally overthrew Czar Nicholas II, they were radicals.
The word conservative entered English from the Middle French conservatif in the late 1300s. The use of the word in politics traces to French disciples of Edmund Burke's opposition to the French Revolution and his call for clerical and political restoration in 1790. They called him "Le Conservateur."
By 1830 or so in Britain, conservative replaced the pejorative Tory as Tory was the name of a British political party first composed of Yorkist Tories of 1680. Tories were Irish Catholics who were dispossessed of their land and hence the label Tory, which means outlaw.
When the Democrats who controlled the 63rd United States Congress and the presidency in Woodrow Wilson established the Federal Reserve, they were radicals. Today, those who defend the Federal Reserve monetary system of 100% bank credit are conservatives.
The Republican Party started out as radicals. They overthrew the slavery system of the South and caused a civil war over it. They were radicals when they overthrew the monetary system based on money and went with one based on greenbacks.
The Republican Party have ended up as conservatives. They are trying to preserve their 40 years of globalization and internationalism.
Free-capitalist progressive restorationists are those who believe in a limited role for government and a strict adherence to the constitution. Conservatives do not believe in these things.
The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution. Obama is a radical. Bernie Sanders is a radical.
Bernie and Obama are tribalists. Marxist / Socialists are tribalists. Tribalism is not a kind of liberalism nor a kind of progressivism. To better understand Obama, check out BEATING THE DRUMS FOR OBAMA TRIBALISM.
Hillary Clinton is a conservative. She wants to preserve the status quo of the globalists as her husband was a globalist. Ted Cruz is a conservative. So too are Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich.
Either way, whether with Obama and Bernie, or Hillary, Cruz, Rubio, Bush, Christie, or Kasich, any of those people will wreck the USA. Open-borders and international ruling boards that aren't elected by Americans will kill the USA.
To better understand what is happening, check out these:
